PURPOSE. This paper describes the core elements of U.S. nurse practice acts and provides an update of Lavin, Meyer, and Carlson (1999) Review of the Use of Nursing Diagnosis in U.S. Nurse Practice Acts.
METHODS. Nurse practice acts from all states and the District of Columbia were collected and analyzed using qualitative content analysis with the software NVivo8.
FINDINGS. Major themes identified were nursing “care,” nursing process, supervision/delegation, executing the medical regimen, health maintenance/prevention, and teaching nursing. The concept “diagnosis” was a subtheme in 86% of practice acts; however, only 63% utilized “diagnosis” language.
CONCLUSION. The number of practice acts utilizing nursing “diagnosis” language has remained nearly constant over the past decade.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE. Consensus on the use of nursing diagnosis language may be facilitated through linkages with nursing theory and revision of the model Nurse Practice Act.
AbdellahF. G.BelandI. L.MartinA.MathenyR. (1960). Patient-centered approaches to nursing. New York: Macmillian.
2.
American Nurses' Association. (1973). Standards of nursing practice. Kansas City, MO: Author.
3.
American Nurses' Association. (1985). The scope of nursing practice. Kansas City, MO: Author.
4.
American Nurses Association. (2004). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
5.
American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Author.
6.
BennerP.SutphenM.LeonardV.DayL. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BulloughB. (1976). The law and the expanding nursing role. American Journal of Public Health, 66(3), 249–254.
8.
FlanaganJ.JonesD. A. (2007). Nursing language in a time of change: Capturing the focus of the discipline. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 18(1), 1–2.
9.
HendersonV. (1960). Basic principles of nursing care. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
10.
JarrínO. F. (2006). Results from the nurse manifest 2003 study: Nurses' perspectives on nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 29(2), E74–E85.
11.
JarrínO. F. (2007). An integral philosophy and definition of nursing. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 2(4), 79–101.
12.
JarrínO. F. (2010). A philosophical inquiry of nursing metalanguage. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
13.
KnowlesL. D. (1967). Decision making in nursing—A necessity for doing. InProceedings from ANA clinical sessions: 1966. San Francisco and New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
14.
LavinM. A.MeyerG.CarlsonJ. H. (1999). A review of the use of nursing diagnosis in U.S. nurse practice acts. Nursing Diagnosis, 10(2), 57–64. doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.1999.tb00027.x
15.
NANDA-I. (2008). Nursing diagnoses 2009-2011: Definitions and classification. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
NightingaleF. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
18.
PeplauH. E. (1952). Interpersonal relations in nursing. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
19.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). New York: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
20.
QSR. (2008). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 8. Cambridge, MA: QSR International.
21.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. GAO/PEMD-10.3.1. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
YuraH.WalshM. B. (1967). The nursing process: Assessing, planning, implementing, evaluating. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
