Undocumented immigration has been linked to a wave of anti-immigrant legislation during the early 1990s. California led the way by passing Proposition 187, which many suspect led legal immigrants to naturalize. No research has confirmed this suspicion. I argue that the years before, during, and after the legislation's passage and the strength of the labor market represent two contexts of reception in which immigrants reside, which determine naturalization decisions. Event history models show that California's naturalization rates dramatically increased after the legislation's passage, a pattern that is most pronounced among Latinos, while rates declined during difficult times, a pattern more pronounced among Asians. Thus, Latinos’ naturalization rates are affected more by the state policy climate, while Asians rates are affected more by long-term economic health.
References
1.
AguirreB. E., and SaenzR.2002“Testing the Effects of Collectively Expected Durations of Migration: The Naturalization of Mexicans and Cubans.”International Migration Review36(1): 103–124.
2.
AllisonP. D.1995Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide.Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
3.
BalistreriK. S., and Van HookJ.2004“The More Things Change the More They Remain the Same: Mexican Naturalization Before and After Welfare Reform.”International Migration Review38(1): 113–30.
4.
BloemraadI.2002“The North American Naturalization Gap: An Institutional Approach to Citizenship Acquisition in the United States and Canada.”International Migration Review36(1): 193–228.
5.
BorjasG.2002“Welfare Reform and Immigrant Participation in Welfare Programs.”International Migration Review36(4): 1093–1123.
6.
CoxD. R.1972“Regression Models and Life Tables.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society34: 187–220.
7.
FixM., PasselJ. S., and SucherK.2003“Trends in Naturalization.”Immigrant Families and Workers. Facts and Perspectives Brief.Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved June 8th, 2011 <http://www.urban.org/publications/310847>.
8.
FreemanJ.1975The Politics of Women's Liberation.New York, NY: David McKay.
9.
GerhardsJ., and RuchtD.1992“Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing Processes in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany.”American Journal of Sociology98(3): 555–595.
10.
GuiraudonV.2000“The Marshallian Triptych Reordered: The Role of Courts and Bureaucracies in Furthering Migrants’ Social Rights.” In Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State. Eds MommesM., and GeddesA.London: Routledge. Pp. 71–88.
11.
JassoG., and RosenzweigM. R.1990The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
JenkinsJ. C., and PerrowC.1977“Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946–1972).”American Sociological Review42(2): 249–268.
13.
Jones-CorreaM.1998Between Two Nations: The Political Predicament of Latinos in New York City.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Jones-CorreaM.2001“Institutional and Contextual Factors in Immigrant Naturalization and Voting.”Citizenship Studies5(1): 41–56.
15.
Jones-CorreaM.2008“Immigrant Incorporation in Suburbia: The Role of Bureaucratic Norms in Education.” In New Faces in New Places: The Changing Geography of American Immigration. Ed. MasseyD. S.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 308–340.
16.
LewisP. G., and RamakrishnanS. K.2007“Police Practices in Immigrant-Destination Cities: Political Control or Bureaucratic Professionalism?”Urban Affairs Review42(6): 874–900.
17.
LiangZ.1994“Social Contact, Social Capital, and the Naturalization Process: Evidence from Six Immigrant Groups.”Social Science Research23(4): 407–437.
18.
MarrowH. B.2009“Immigrant Bureaucratic Incorporation: The Dual Roles of Professional Missions and Government Policies.”American Sociological Review74(5): 756–776.
19.
MasseyD.1999“Why Does Immigration Occur? A Theoretical Synthesis.” In The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience. Eds HirschmanC., KasinitzP., and DeWindJ.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 34–52.
20.
MasseyD., DurandJ., and MaloneN. J.2002Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
McAdamD.1982Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970.Chicago, IL: the University of Chicago Press.
22.
McAdamD., McCarthyJ. D., and ZaldM. N.1996“Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes –Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Eds McAdamD., McCarthyJ. D., and ZaldM. N.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1–22.
23.
McDonnellP. J., and LopezR. J.1994“70,000 march Through L.A. Against Prop. 187.”Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17A1–A19.
24.
MyersD., CalnanR., JacobsenA., and WheelerJ.2011“California Roller Coaster: Income and Housing in Boom and Bust, 1990–2010.”Special Report, Population Dynamics Research Group, April, 2011.
25.
PortesA., and CurtisJ. W.1987“Changing Flags: Naturalization and its Determinants Among Mexicans.”International Migration Review21(2): 352–371.
26.
PortesA., CurtisJ. W., and RumbautR.1996Immigrant America: A Portrait, 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
PortesA., and CurtisJ. W., and RumbautR.2006Immigrant America: A Portrait, 3rd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
PortesA., and CurtisJ. W., RumbautR., and ZhouM.1993“The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences530: 74–96.
29.
ReeseE., and RamirezE.2002“The New Ethnic Politics of Welfare: Struggles Over Legal Immigrants’ Rights to Welfare in California.”Journal of Poverty6(3): 29–62.
30.
SantoroW. A.1999“Conventional Politics Takes Center Stage: The Latino Struggle Against English-Only Laws.”Social Forces77(3): 877–909.
31.
SingerA., and GilbertsonG.2000“Naturalization in the Wake of Anti-Immigrant Legislation: Dominicans in New York City.”Working Paper No. 10.International Migration Policy Program, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
32.
SingerJ. D., and WillettJ. B.2003Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
U.S. Bureau of the Census2001Census 2000. Summary File 1. United States/Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau [MRDF].Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
34.
WilsonW. J.1996When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor.New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
ZhouM.1997“Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation.”International Migration Review31(4): 975–1008.
37.
ZimmermanW., and TumlinK. C.1999Patchwork Policies: State Assistance for Immigrants Under Welfare Reform.Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
