Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis

Sullivan Joseph , “Bishops File Brief Against Surrogate Motherhood,” New York Times, July 19, 1987, 28.

Schneider Keith , “Mothers Urge Ban on Surrogacy as Form of ‘Slavery,’” New York Times, Sept. 1, 1987.

Id.

Quoted in “Who's Who in the Fight for Baby M,” New York Times, April 1, 1987, sec. B2.

Quoted in Schneider, supra note 2.

Hanley Robert , “Seven-Week Trial Touched Many Basic Emotions,” New York Times, April 1, 1987, sec. B2.

Feron James , “Testimony Is Given on Surrogate Bill,” New York Times, April 11, 1987.

Walters LeRoy , “Ethics and New Reproductive Technologies: An International Review of Committee Statements,” Hastings Center Report, 17 (June 1987, Special Supplement): 3–9.

Macklin Ruth , “Personhood in the Bioethics Literature,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 61 (1983): 35–37.

Walters , supra note 8.

Sullivan , supra note 1, at 28.

Brahams Diana , “The Hasty British Ban on Commercial Surrogacy,” Hastings Center Report, 17 (Feb. 1987): 16–19.

Sullivan , supra note 1, at 28.

Callahan Sidney , “No Child Wants to Live in a Womb for Hire,” National Catholic Reporter, Oct. 11, 1985.

Id.

Callahan Sidney , as quoted in Iver Peterson, “Baby M Trial Splits Ranks of Feminists,” New York Times, Feb. 24, 1987, sec B1.

Annas George , “Baby M: Babies (and Justice) for Sale,” Hastings Center Report, 17 (June 1987): 13–15, at 14.

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Surrogate Parenting Associates, Inc. (Oct. 26, 1983), Kentucky Circuit Court, Franklin County.

Andrews Lori , “The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood,” Hastings Center Report, 17 (Oct./Nov. 1987): 31–40, at 35.

Id.

Id.

See Macklin Ruth , “‘Due’ and ‘Undue’ Inducements: On Paying Money to Research Subjects,” IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 3 (May 1981): 1–6. The arguments in this section are excerpted from the article.

See Kass Leon , “‘Making Babies’ Revisited,” The Public Interest, 54 (Winter 1979): 32–60.

National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, 42 U.S.C. Para. 274(e) (1982).

See, gen., Radin Margaret , “Market Inalienability,” Harvard Law Review, 100 (June 1987): 1849–1937.