LorberJ., “Results of treatment of myelomeningcocele.”Dev Med Child Neuro13:279–303, 1971; DuffR.S.CampbellA.G.M., “Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special care nursery.”N Eng J Med289:890–94, 1973.
2.
McCormickR.A., “To save or let die: The dilemma of modern medicine.”JAMA, 1974;229:172–6.
3.
HentoffN., “The awful privacy of Baby Doe.”The Atlantic Monthly, January, 1985:54–61.
4.
StrattonK.StarkL., “Linares: The untold story.”The Nursing Spectrum, 1989;2:15,20.
5.
American Hospital Association, “The Linares Case.”Hospital Ethics, 1989;5(4):11–4.
6.
JennettB.PlumF., “Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name.”Lancet1972;i;734–7.
7.
SkultetyF.M., “Clinical and experimental aspects of akinetic mutism.”Arch Neurol1968; 19:1–14; YoungR.S.K.PhelanK.W.LehmanR.A., “Computed tomographic findings in akinetic mutism.”Am J Dis Child1984;1(38):38–166.
BrierleyJ.B.AdamsJ.H.GrahamD.I., “Neocortical death after cardiac arrest.”Lancet1971;2:560–65.
10.
PlumF.PosnerJ.B., The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. ed 3.Philadelphia, FA Davis Co, 1980, 7–8, 24–26.
11.
FeinbergW.M.FerryP.C., “A fate worse than death: The persistent vegetative state in childhood.”Am J Dis Child1984;138: 128–30.
12.
Executive Board, American Academy of Neurology.“Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the persistent vegetative state patient.”Neurology, 1989;3(9):9–125.
13.
MutohK.NakagawaY.HojoH., “CT appearance of children in a persistent vegetative state.”Brain Dev1987;9:605–9.
14.
LevyD.E.SidtisJ.J.RottenbergD.A., “Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked in patients.”Ann Neurol1987;2(2):2–673.
15.
HigashiK.HatanoM.AbikoS., “Five-year follow- up study of patients with persistent vegetative state.”J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1981;4(4):4–552.
16.
ShuttleworthE., “Recovery to social and economic independence from prolonged post-anoxic vegetative state”. Neurology1983; 33:372–4.
17.
GilliesJ.D.SeshiaS.S., “Vegetative state following coma in childhood: Evolution and outcome”. Dev Med Child Neuro1980, 22:642–48.
18.
CoulterD.L., “Neurologic uncertainty in newborn internsive care”. N Eng J Med, 1987;3(16):16–840.
19.
CampbellA.G.M., “Children in a persistent vegetative state”. Brit Med J, 1984;289:1022–3. Gillies, supra note 17.
20.
MargolisL.H.ShaywitzB.A., “The outcome of prolonged coma in childhood”. Pediatrics1980;6(5):5–477.
21.
Mutoh, supra note 13.
22.
CambellA.G.M., “Children in a persistent vegetative state”. Brit Med J, 1984;2(89):89–1022. Feinberg, supra note 11; Gillies et. al., supra note 17.
23.
MinkR.B.PollackM.M., “A prospective study of the causes of death”. Pediatr Res, 1989;25:41A.
24.
PlessJ.E., “The story of Baby Doe”. N Eng J Med1983; 309:664
25.
BrownL.D., “Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: The Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants”. J Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1986; 11(2):231–254.
26.
American Academy of Pediatrics v. Heckler 561 F. Supp 395(D.D.C. 1983); American Hosp. Association v. Heckler 585 F. Supp 541 (S.D.N.Y. 1984), aff'd, Nos 84–6211 and 84–6213 (2nd Cir Dec 27, 1984); Otis Bowen vs. American Hospital Association. U.S. Supreme court No 84–1529.
27.
MoskhopJ.C.SaldanhaR.L., “The Baby Doe Rule, Still a Threat”. Hast Cent Rep1986; 16(2):8–14.
28.
Illinois Abuse and Neglect Child Reporting Act, eff 1/1/87. Secs 2053, and 2057. 3a.
29.
Matter of Quinlan. 355 A. 2nd 647.
30.
In re L.H.R. 321 SE 2d 716 at 723
31.
In re P.V.W. La 424 So 2d 1015 at 1020
32.
In re Guardianship of Andrew James Barry, a minor. 455 So. 2d 365.
33.
Custody of a Minor, Mass, 379 NE 2d 1053. at 1063
34.
RhodenN.K., “Treatment Dilemmas for imperiled newborns: Why quality of life counts”. S Cal L Rev.1985;5(8):8–1283.
35.
RobertsonJ.A., “Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns: A legal analysis”. Stanford L Rev, 1975;2(7):7–213.
36.
BakerJ.G., “Declaratory Judgment in the Infant Doe Case”. Issues in Law & Medicine, 1986;2:77–80.
37.
Weber v Stony Brook Hosp, 467 NYS 2d 685 at 687.
38.
U.S. v. Univ Hosp State U of NY 729 F2d 144 at 146–7; Matter of Hofbauer 419 NY 2nd 936 at 939. 393 NE 2nd 1009; RobertsonJ.A., “Dilemma in Danville”Hast Centr Rep11:5–81981; In re Guardianship of Andrew James Barry, a minor. 455 So. 2d 365.
39.
ArrasJ.D., “Toward an ethic of ambiguity”. Hastings Cent Rep1984;15(2):25–33.
40.
BrennanT.A.“The optimum care committee at Massachusetts General Hospital”. JAMA, 1988.
41.
DuffR.S.CampbellA.G.M.“On deciding the care of severely handicapped or dying persons: With particular reference to infants”. Pediatrics, 1976:57:487–91; GrossR.H.CoxA.TatyrekR.PollayM.BarnesW.A., “Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele”. Pediatrics1983;7(2):2–450.
42.
MichaelsR.H.OliverT.K., “Human rights consultation: A 12-year experience of a pediatric bioethics committee”. Pediatrics, 1986; 78:566–72; KliegmanR.MahowaldM.YoungnerS., “In our best interests: Experience and workings of an ethics review committee”. J Peds, 1986;108:178–187.
43.
LantosJ.D.MilesS.H., “Autonomy in adolescence: A framework for decisions about end of life care”. J Adolesc Med, 1989, In Press.
44.
HolderA., Legal Issues in Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. Yale University Press1985.