AppelbaumP.S.LidzC.W.MeiselA.. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York, Oxford University Press, 1987; MeiselA., The Right to Die. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1989; BuchananA.E.BrockD.W., Deciding for Others. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
2.
Id., Buchanan; President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Making Health Care Decisions.Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982; President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment.Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.
3.
Id., Buchanan; Id., Meisel; Id., President's Commission, Making Health Care Decisions.
4.
President's Commission, note 2 supra, Making Health Care Decisions, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment.
5.
BuchananA.BrockD.W., “Deciding for others”, Milbank Memorial Quarterly1986, 64(supp 2):17–94.
6.
PelegrinoE.D.ThomasmaD.G., For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York, Oxford University Press, 1988.
7.
Appelbaum., supra note 1.
8.
DraneJ.F., “Competency to give an informed consent”, JAMA1984, 252:925–927; Buchanan, supra note 1.
9.
WolfS.M., “Conflict between doctor and patient”, Law, Medicine & Health Care1988, 16:197–203.
10.
Appelbaum, supra note 1; Meisel, supra note 1.
11.
Meisel, supra note 1.
12.
Ibid.
13.
Ibid.
14.
Ibid.
15.
FadenR.BeauchampT., A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1988; Buchanan, supra note 1.
16.
Appelbaum, supra note 1; Buchanan, supra note 1.
17.
Faden, supra note 15.
18.
State Dep't of Human Resources v. Northern. 563 S.W.2d 197 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1978).
19.
In re Brooks. 32 Ill.2d 361, 205 N.E.2d 435 (1965).
20.
Buchanan, supra note 1.
21.
LipowskiZ.J., “Delirium in the elderly patient”, N Engl J Med1989, 320:578–582; KatzmanR., “Alzheimer's disease”, N Engl J Med1986, 314:964–973.
22.
LarsonE.B.KukullW.A.BuchnerD.ReiflerB.V., “Adverse drug reactions associated with global cognitive impairment in elderly persons”, Ann Intern Med1987, 107:169–173.
23.
ApplebaumP.S.GrissoT., “Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment”, N Engl J Med1988, 319:1635–1638.
24.
KaneR.L.OuslanderJ.G.IbrassI.B., Essentials of Clinical Geriatrics (2nd ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill, 1989.
25.
Ibid.
26.
In re Quackenbush. 156 N.J. Super. 282, 383 A.2d 785 (1978).
27.
Ibid.
28.
Lane v. Candura. 6 Mass. App. 377,376 N.E.2d 1232 (1978).
29.
Ibid.
30.
PerlM.ShelpE.E., “Psychiatric consultation masking moral dilemmas in medicine”, N Engl J Med1982, 307:618–621; Appelbaum, supra notes 1 and 23.
31.
Id., Perl.
32.
Ibid.
33.
CanduraLane v., supra note 28.
34.
LoB., “The Bartling case: Protecting patients from harm while respecting their wishes”, J Am Geriatr Soc1986, 34:44–48.
35.
QuillT.E., “Partnerships in patient care: A contractual approach”, Ann Intern Med 193, 98:228–234.
36.
A Report by the Hastings Center, Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment in the care of the dying. Briarcliff Manor, N.Y., The Hastings Center, 1987; WanzerS.H.FedermanD.D.AdelsteinS.J.., “The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients: A second look”, N Engl J Med1989, 320:844–849; Stein-BrookR.LoB., “Artificial feedings; solid ground, not slippery slope”, N Engl J Med1988, 318:286–290; Meisel, supra note 1; President's Commission, supra note 2.
37.
Cruzan vs. Harmon. 760 S.W.2d 408; In re O'Connor. 72 N.Y.2d 517, 531 N.E.2d 607,534 N.Y.S.2d 886 (1988); LoB.RouseF.DornbrandL., “Family decisionmaking on trial: Who decides for incompetent patients?”N Engl J Med1990, 322:1228–1231.