SmithA., The Wealth of Nations, CannanE., ed. (New York: The Modern Library, 2000): Book IV, chapter II, at 484–85.
2.
ManneH. G., “Milton Friedman Was Right,”Wall Street Journal, November 24, 2006, at A12.
3.
See LangevoortD. C., “Resetting the Corporate Thermostat: Lessons from the Recent Financial Scandals about Self-Deception, Deceiving Others and the Design of Internal Controls,”Georgetown Law Journal93, no. 1 (2004): 285–317, at 288. (“[I]nvoking psychological traits makes the orthodox corporate scholars queasy for a variety of well-mooted reasons, including their contingent, soft, hard-to-model properties and the economists' natural suspicion that cognitive weaknesses are weeded out in the crucible of corporate competition and thus trivial.”)
4.
See CalabresiG.BobbittP., Tragic Choices (New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Inc., 1978): At 33 (describing pure market as presenting “the wrenching spectacle of a rich man and a poor man bidding against each other for life”).
5.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107–204, 116 Stat. 745 (codified in scattered sections of 11, 15, 18, 28, and 29 U.S.C.); see generally RibsteinL. E., “Market vs. Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A Critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,”Journal of Corporation Law28, no. 1 (2002): 1–67; Note, “The Good, the Bad, and Their Corporate Codes of Ethics: Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley, and the Problems with Legislating Good Behavior,”Harvard Law Review116, no. 7 (2003): 2123–2141.
6.
See Manne, supra note 2.
7.
See RosenblattR. E., Law and the American Health Care System (New York: Foundation Press, 1997): At 486–87 (quoting excerpt from AndersG., “A Plan to Cut Back on Medicare Expenses Goes Awry; Costs Soar: Hospitals Rush to Remodel to Offer Subacute Care – And Get Paid Twice,”Wall Street Journal, October 3, 1996, at A1).
8.
Stephenson v. Shalala, 87 F.3d 350 (9th Cir. 1996) (included in Rosenblatt, supra note 7, at 487–94); see 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(a)(2)(A)(ii) (1995) (beneficiary payment); 42 U.S.C. § 1395l(a)(2)(B)(i) (1995) (government payment).
9.
See Langevoort, supra note 3, at 303 (suggesting that Machiavellian leaders are “adept at rationalization: Convincing himself as well as others that what is self-serving is also right” and that “[t]his sort of ethical plasticity…makes it much easier to win successive rounds over both the ethically stout and the ethically void”).
10.
WeeksE. A., “Gauging the Cost of Loopholes: Health Care Pricing and Medicare Regulation in the Post-Enron Era,”Wake Forest Law Review40, no. 4 (2005): 1215–86.
11.
See id., at notes 174–84 and accompanying text (citing Federal Register and other agency statements, acknowledging but declining to close outlier loophole).
RundleR. L., “Tenet to Pay $725 Million to Settle Medicare Case,”Wall Street Journal, June 29, 2006, at A3; KocieniewskiD., “Hospitals Grew with Medicare Paying the Way,”New York Times, August 20, 2006, at 1, 23 (describing $265 settlement by non-profit Saint Barnabas Health Care System for “systematically inflating their bills”).
15.
VogtK., “Suit Claims Unnecessary Surgeries at Tenet,”American Medical News, May 19, 2003 (quoting opposing counsel's comment), available at <http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2003/05/19/bisc0519.htm> (last visited March 15, 2007).
16.
42 U.S.C. § 1395 (Supp. IV 2000) (prohibiting government from “exercis[ing] any supervision or control over the administration or operation of any institution,” which arguably includes billing practices).
17.
ArmstrongD., “How Some Doctors Turn a $90 Profit from a $17 Test; Physician Groups Add Markup to Work Done by Others Despite Ethical Concerns; Administrative Costs Cited,”Wall Street Journal, September 30, 2005, at A1.
18.
42 C.F.R. § 424.80(b)(2) & (d) (2007) (setting forth contractual arrangement exception to Medicare ban on reassignment of supplier claims).
19.
See Medicare Program, Revisions to Payment Policies, 71 Fed. Reg. 69624 (December 1, 2006) (declining to make changes to rule, but stating that issue would be studied and changes would be made “in the near future”).
20.
See 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn (Supp. IV. 2000).
21.
See 42 U.S.C. § 1320a – 7b(b) (Supp. IV. 2000).
22.
See 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1) (Supp. IV. 2000).
23.
See Armstrong, supra note 17, at A8.
24.
WeilJ., “Nine Are Charged in KPMG Case on Tax Shelters,”Wall Street Journal, August 30, 2005, at C1.
25.
Id., at C4.
26.
The Massachusetts Plan and the Future of Universal Coverage, papers presented at the Kansas Law Review Annual Symposium, Lawrence, Kansas, November 10, 2006 (papers to be published in Kansas Law Review, no. 4 [2007]).
27.
An Act Providing Access to Affordable, Quality, Accountable Health Care, 2006 Massachusetts Acts, Chapter 58, Section 47.