Over the past few years we have witnessed a sharp decline in the domestic and international market share of U.S. manufacturing organizations. The decline in U.S. manufacturing has provided an avalanche of criticism and attention in the literature and popular press. Recently, however, several organizations have implemented new work‐force management policies to reverse the decline. We describe the case of Rohm and Haas Kentucky, Incorporated, a plant that has implemented work teams. The outcomes of these innovations include a decline in worker grievances and turnover, an improvement in the safety record of the plant, as well as an increase in productivity.
BurrellG. and MorganG. (1979), Sociological Paradigm and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, London, UK.
2.
DollW. J. and VanderembseM. A. (1990), “The Evolution of Manufacturing Systems: Towards the Post Industrial Enterprise.”Proceedings of the U.K. Operations Management Association Conference, Warwick University, Coventry, England. 115–128.
3.
DumaineB. (1989), “How Managers Can Succeed Through Speed,”Fortune, February 13, 54–59.
4.
GuptaY. P. and SomersT. M. (1993), “Factory Automation and Integration of Business Functions,”Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 12, 1, 15–23.
5.
HayesR. and JaikumarR. (1988), “Manufacturing's Crises: New Technologies, Old Assumptions,”Harvard Business Review, 67, 5, 77–85.
6.
HuberG. P. (1984), “The Nature and Design of Post‐Industrial Organizations,”Management Science, 30, 8, 928–951.
7.
JuranJ. M. (1987), On Planning for Quality, Free Press, New York.
8.
KanterR. M. (1982), The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation, Simon and Schuster, New York.
9.
KernaghanJ., and CookeR. (1986), “The Contribution of the Group Process to Successful Project Planning in R&D Settings,”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 33, 3, 134–140.
10.
LarssonR. (1993), “Case Survey Methodology: Quantitative Analysis of Patterns Across Case Studies,”Academy of Management Journal, 36, 6, 1515–1546.
11.
LeiD. and GoldharJ. D. (1990), “Multiple Niche Competition: The Strategic Use of CIM Technology,”Manufacturing Review, 3, 3, 195–206.
12.
MulroneyJ. P. (1987), “Operations Report,” Company Report (Rohm and Haas annual report), 4 May, 8.
13.
OhmeK., (1988), “Getting Back to Strategy,”Harvard Business Review, 66, 6, 149–156.
14.
PetersT. (1987), Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
15.
Port, (1989), “The Best Engineered Part is no Part at all,”Business Week, May 8, 150.
16.
RHK (1984) Group Skills and Techniques, Louisville, Kentucky, Rohm and Haas, internal document.
17.
SkinnerW. (1985), Manufacturing: The Formidable Competitive Weapon, John Wiley, New York.
18.
StalkG. (1988), “Time: The Next Source of Competitive Advantage,”Harvard Business Review, 67, 4, 41–51.
19.
TaylorA. (1988), “Why Ford Sell Like Big Macs,”Fortune, November 21., 122–128.
20.
WaltonR. E. and SusmanG. I., (1987), “People Policies for the New Machines,”Harvard Business Review, 66, 2, 98–106.
