STOCK LEVELS AND DELIVERY RATES IN VENDORMANAGED INVENTORY PROGRAMS

Abstract

Using the latest information technology, powerful retailers like Wal‐Mart have taken the lead in forging shorter replenishment‐cycles, automated supply systems with suppliers. With the objective to reduce cost, these retailers are directing suppliers to take full responsibility for managing stocks and deliveries. Suppliers' performance is measured according to how often inventory is shipped to the retailer, and how often customers are unable to purchase the product because it is out of stock. This emerging trend also implies that suppliers are absorbing a large part of the inventory and delivery costs and, therefore, must plan delivery programs including delivery frequency to ensure that the inherent costs are minimized.

With the idea to incorporate this shift in focus, this paper looks at the problem facing the supplier who wants quicker replenishment at lower cost. In particular, we present a model that seeks the best trade‐off among inventory investment, delivery rates, and permitting shortages to occur, given some random demand pattern for the product. The process generating demand consists of two components: one is deterministic and the other is random. The random part is assumed to follow a compound Poisson process. Furthermore, we assume that the supplier may fail to meet uniform shipping schedules, and, therefore, uncertainty is present in delivery times. The solution to this transportationinventory problem requires determining jointly delivery rates and stock levels that will minimize transportation, inventory, and shortage costs. Several numerical results are presented to give a feel of the optimal policy's general behavior.

Keywords

INVENTORY CONTROL VENDOR‐MANAGED INVENTORY DELIVERY FREQUENCY PROBABILISTIC MODELS

References

Azoury

and Brill

P. H.

(1986), “An Application of the System‐Point Method to Inventory Models Under Continuous Review,” Journal of Applied Probability, 23, 778–789.

Azoury

and Brill

P. H.

(1992), “Analysis of Net Inventory in Continuous Review Models With Random Lead Time,” European Journal of Operational Research, 59, 383–392.

Bagchi

Hayya

, and Chu

(1986), “The Effect of Leadtime Variability: The Case of Independent Demand,” Journal of Operations Management, 6, 2, 159–177.

Baumol

W. J.

and Vinod

H. D.

(1970), “An Inventory Theoretic Model of Freight Transport Demand,” Management Science, 16, 7, 413–421.

Bourland

K. E.

Powell

S. G.

, and Pyke

D. F.

(1996), “Exploiting Timely Demand Information to Reduce Inventories,” European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 2, 239–253.

Brill

P. H.

(1996), “Level Crossing Methods,” in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Gass

S. I.

and Harris

C. M.

(eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Brill

P. H.

(1996), “Level Crossing Methods,” in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Gass

S. I.

and Harris

C. M.

and Posner

M. J. M.

(1981), ‘The System‐Point Method in Exponential Queues: A Level Crossing Approach,” Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 31–49.

Brill

P. H.

(1996), “Level Crossing Methods,” in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Gass

S. I.

and Harris

C. M.

and Chaouch

A. B.

(1995), “An EOQ Model with Random Variations in Demand,” Management Science, 41, 5, 927–936.

Clark

T. H.

and Mckenney

J. L.

(1994), Campbell Soup Company: A Leader in Continuous Replenishment Innovations, HBS Case N9‐195‐124, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

10.

Constable

G. K.

and Whybark

D. C.

(1978), “The Interaction of Transportation and Inventory Decisions,” Decision Sciences, 9, 4, 688–699.

11.

Ehrhardt

(1984), “(s, S) Policies for a Dynamic Inventory Model with Stochastic Lead Times,” Operations Research, 32, 1, 121–132.

12.

Fisher

M. L.

(1997), “What is the Right Supply Chain for your Product? Harvard Business Review, March‐April issue, 105–116.

13.

Hammond

J. H.

(1994), Barilla SpA, HBS Case N9‐694‐046, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

14.

Herron

D. P.

(1979), “Managing Physical Distribution for Profit,” Harvard Business Review, 57, 3, 121–132.

15.

Iyer

A. V.

and Bergen

M. E.

(1997), “Quick‐Response in Manufacturer‐Retailer Channels,” Management Science, 43, 4, 559–570.

16.

Kaplan

(1970), “A Dynamic Inventory Model with Stochastic Lead Times,” Management Science, 16, 491–507.

17.

Karlin

(1958), “Steady State Solutions,” in Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production, Arrow

Karlin

, and Scarf (eds.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, Chapter 14.

18.

Lee

H. L.

and Nahmias

(1993), “Single‐Product, Single‐Location Models,” in Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science: Logistics of Production and Inventory, Graves

S. C.

Kan

A. H. G. Rinnooy

, and Zipkin

P. H.

(eds.), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Vol. 4.

19.

Nahmias

(1976), “On the Equivalence of Three Approximate Continuous Review Inventory Models,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 23, 31–36.

20.

Nahmias

and Smith

S. A.

(1994), “Optimizing Inventory Levels in a Two‐Echelon Retailer System With Partial Lost Sales,” Management Science, 40, 5, 582–596.

21.

Porteus

(1990), “Stochastic Inventory Theory,” in Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Stochastic Models, Heyman

and Sobel

(eds.), Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Vol. 2.

22.

Silver

E. A.

Pyke

D. F.

, and Peterson

(1998), Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

23.

Song

(1994), “The Effect of Leadtime Uncertainty in a Simple Stochastic Inventory Model,” Management Science, 40, 5, 603–613.

24.

Tijms

H. C.

(1986), Stochastic Modelling and Analysis: A Computational Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

25.

Zipkin

(1986), “Stochastic Leadtimes in Continuous‐time Inventory Models,” Naval Research Logistics, 33, 763–774.