PURPOSE: Understanding how nurse practitioners use clinical decision skills in practice has the potential to guide education programs to ensure safe, competent, and high quality advanced nursing practice. This study used the lens of social judgment theory to examine the clinical decision making of 60 nurse practitioners.
METHODS: A three-group pretest–posttest comparison design was used to evaluate how much insight nurse practitioners had into their clinical decision-making process.
FINDINGS: Nurse practitioners had modest insight into their clinical decision-making process.
CONCLUSION: Self-insight has implications for enhancing nurses' decision making, improving education, and fostering agreement among advanced practice nurses.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Self-insight has implications for developing professional decision making and promoting appropriate educational opportunities for advanced practice nurses.
Aiman-SmithL.ScullenS. E.BarrS. H. (2002). Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 388–414.
2.
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. (2010). Standards of practice for nurse practitioners. Retrieved from http://www.aanp.org/AANPCMS2/
3.
American Heart Association. (2010). Heart disease and stroke statistics. Retrieved from http://americanheart.org
4.
AndersonK.WilsonP.OdellP.KannelW. (1991). An updated coronary risk profile: A statement for health professionals. Circulation, 83, 356–362.
BambiniD.WashburnJ.PerkinsR. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 79–82.
7.
BecksteadJ. W. (2003). Attitudes accentuate attributes in social judgment: The combined effects of substance use, depression, and technical incompetence on judgments of professional impairment. Journal of Social Psychology, 143(2), 185–201.
8.
BecksteadJ. W.StampK. D. (2007). Understanding how nurse practitioners estimate patients' risk for coronary heart disease: A judgment analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(4), 436–446.
9.
BlazerW. K.DohertyM. E.O'ConnerR. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410–433.
10.
BohnS. A. (1984). The diagnosis of schizophrenia: A social judgment study. Unpublished dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
11.
BrehmerA.BrehmerB. (1988). What have we learned about human judgment from thirty years of policy capturing? InBrehmerB.JoyceC. R. B. (Eds.), Human judgment: The social judgment theory view (pp.75–114). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
12.
BrunswikE. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.
13.
BrunswikE. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
BurmanM. E.StephansM. B.JansaN.SteinerS. (2002). How do NPs make clinical decisions?The Nurse Practitioner, 27(5), 57–64.
15.
CookseyR. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Francisco: Academic Press.
16.
HammondK. R.HurschC. J.ToddF. J. (1964). Analyzing the components of clinical inference. Psychological Review, 71, 438–456.
17.
HammondK. R.StewartT. R.BrehmerB.SteinmannD. O. (1975). Social judgment theory. InKaplanM.SchwartzS. (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp.271–312). New York: Academic Press.
18.
HarriesP. A.GilhoolyK. J. (2010). Occupational therapists' self-insight into their referral prioritization policies for clients with mental health needs. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57, 417–424.
19.
HealdJ. E. (1991). Social judgment theory: Applications to educational decision making. Education Administration Quarterly, 27, 343–357.
20.
HirshA. T.JensenM. P.RobinsonM. E. (2010). Evaluation of nurses' self-insight into their pain assessment and treatment decisions. Journal of Pain, 11(5), 454–461.
21.
HolzworthR.WillsC. (1999). Nurses' judgments regarding seclusion and restraint of psychiatric patients: A social judgment analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 22, 189–201.
22.
KellyK. J. (1964). An approach to the study of clinical inference in nursing. Introduction to the study of clinical inference in nursing. Nursing Research, 13, 314–315.
23.
KroghV. K. (2008). An examination of the NANDA international taxonomy for domain completeness, ontological homogeneity, and clinical functionality. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19(2), 65–75.
24.
LasaterK. (2007). High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Student's experiences. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(6), 269–276.
25.
LevinR. F.LunneyM.Krainovich-MillerB. (2004). Improving diagnostic accuracy using an evidence-based nursing model. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 15(4), 114–122.
26.
LunneyM. (2003). Critical thinking and accuracy of nurses' diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 14(3), 96–107.
27.
MurphyA. H. (1988). Skill scores based on mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient. Monthly Weather Review, 116, 2417–2424.
28.
NewmanM.SmithM.PharrisM.JonesD. (2008). The focus of the discipline revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(1), 16–27.
29.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
30.
OffredyM. (1998). The application of decision making concepts by nurse practitioners in general practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(5), 988–1000.
31.
OffredyM. (2002). Access to primary care: Decision making by GP receptionists. British Journal of Community Nursing, 7(9), 480–485.
32.
OffredyM.MeerabeauE. (2005). The use of “think aloud” technique, information processing theory and schema theory to explain decision-making processes of general practitioners and nurse practitioners using patient scenarios. Primary Healthcare Research and Development, 6, 46–59.
33.
OffredyM.KendallS.GoodmanC. (2008). The use of cognitive continuum theory and patient scenarios to explore nurse prescribers' pharmacological knowledge and decision-making. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(6), 855–868.
34.
ReillyB. A.DohertyM. E. (1989). A note on the assessment of self-insight in judgment research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 123–131.
35.
ReillyB. A.DohertyM. E. (1992). The assessment of self-insight in judgment policies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 285–309.
36.
RooseJ. E.DohertyM. E. (1978). A social judgment theoretic approach to sex discrimination in faculty salaries. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 193–215.
37.
ShulmanL. S.ElsteinA. S. (1975). Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision making: Implications for educational research. InKerlingerF. N. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 3, pp.21–34). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
38.
SnowR. E. (1968). Brunswikian approaches to research on teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 475–489.
39.
ThompsonC.FosterA.ColeI.DowdingD. (2005). Using social judgment theory to model nurses' use of clinical information in critical care education. Nurse Education Today, 25, 68–77.
40.
TuckerL. R. (1964). A suggested alternative formulation in the developments by Hursch, Hammond, & Hursch and by Hammond, Hursch, & Todd. Psychological Review, 71, 528–530.
41.
UllmanD. G.DohertyM. E. (1984). Two determinants of the diagnosis of hyperactivity: The child and the clinician. InWolraichM.RouthD. K. (Eds.), Advances in behavioral pediatrics (pp. 167–219). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42.
WigtonR. S. (1988). Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine. InBrehmerB.JoyceC. R. B. (Eds.), Human judgment: The social judgment theory view (pp.227–246). Amsterdam: North Holland Elsevier.
43.
WillisD.GraceP.RoyC. (2008). A central unifying focus for the discipline: Facilitating humanization, meaning, choice, quality of life, and healing in living and dying. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(1), 28–40.
