PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between multiple variables within a model of critical thinking and moral reasoning.
METHODS: A quantitative descriptive correlational design using a purposive sample of 200 emergency nurses. Measured variables were accuracy in clinical decision-making, moral reasoning, perceived care environment, and demographics. Analysis was by bivariate correlation using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients, chi square and multiple linear regression analysis.
FINDINGS: The elements as identified in the integrated ethically-driven environmental model of clinical decision-making (IEDEM-CD) corrected depict moral reasoning and environment of care as factors significantly affecting accuracy in decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: The integrated, ethically driven environmental model of clinical decision making is a framework useful for predicting clinical decision making accuracy for emergency nurses in practice, with further implications in education, research and policy.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A diagnostic and therapeutic framework for identifying and remediating individual and environmental challenges to accurate clinical decision making.
AnderssonA.-K.OmbergM.SvendlundM. (2006). Triage in the emergency department—a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. Nursing in Critical Care, 11(3), 136–145.
ChungJ. (2003). Postoperative pain management: Study of patients’ level of pain and satisfaction with health care providers’ responsiveness to their reports of pain. Nursing & Health Sciences, 5, 13–21.
4.
ChungJ. Y. M. (2005). An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 13, 206–213.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
DihleA.BjølsethG.HelsethS. (2006). The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 469–475.
7.
FryM.BurrG. (2001). Using a survey tool to explore the processes underpinning the triage role: A pilot study. Australian Emergency Nursing Journal, 4 (1), 27–31.
8.
GerdtzM. F.BucknallT. K. (2001). Triage nurses’ clinical decision making: An observational study of urgency assessment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(4), 550–561.
9.
GoranssonK.EhnforsM.FonteynM.EhrenbergA. (2008). Thinking strategies used by registered nurses during emergency department triage. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(2), 163–172.
10.
Ives EricksenJ.DuffyM.GibbonsM. P.FitzmauriceJ.DiomasiM.JonesD. (2004). Development and psychometric evaluation of the professional practice environment (PPE) scale. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(3), 279–285.
11.
Layman YoungJ.HortonF. M.DavidhizarR. (2006). Nursing attitudes and beliefs in pain assessment and management. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 412–421.
12.
RestJ. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
SchmalenbergC.KramerM.KingC.KrugmanM.LundC.PoduskaD., et al. (2005). Excellence through evidence: Securing collegial/collaborative nurse-physician relationships, part 1. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(10), 450–458.
14.
WildR.MitchellP. H. (2000). Quality pain management outcomes: The power of place. Outcomes Management for Nursing Practice, 4, 136–143.
15.
WillsonH. (2000). Factors affecting the administration of analgesia to patients following repair of a fractured hip. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1145–1154.
16.
WolfL. (2010). Acuity assignation: An ethnographic exploration of clinical decision-making by emergency nurses at initial patient presentation. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 32(3), 1–13.
