Trigger Point Dry Needling versus Strain–counterstrain Technique for Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background

Treatment of active myofascial trigger points includes both invasive and non-invasive techniques.

Objectives

To compare the effects of upper trapezius trigger point dry needling (DN) and strain–counterstrain (SCS) techniques versus sham SCS.

Study Design

Randomised controlled trial.

Method

34 study subjects with active trigger points were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups, and received either three sessions of DN (n=12), six sessions of SCS (n=10), or sham SCS (n=12) over a 3-week period. Subjective pain response and subjects’ own ratings of perceived disability were measured.

Results

The analysis of variance mixed model showed a significant time effect for pain (p<0.001), elicited pain (p<0.001), pain pressure threshold (p<0.01), and neck disability index (p=0.016). Pain at rest decreased in all groups, as follows: DN 18.5 mm (95% CI 4.3 to 32.7 mm); SCS 28.3 mm (95% CI 12.4 to 44.1 mm); sham SCS 21.9 mm (95% CI 3.5 to 40.1 mm). Reductions in disability score (points) were significant in the SCS group (5.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.4) but not in the DN (1.4, 95% CI −4.9 to 2.1) or sham SCS (1.8, 95% CI −6.4 to 2.7) groups. There was no significant group×time interaction effect for any variables studied.

Conclusions

There were no differences between the sham SCS, SCS, and DN groups in any of the outcome measures. DN relieved pain after fewer sessions than SCS and sham SCS, and thus may be a more efficient technique. Future studies should include a larger sample size.

Trial Registration Number

NCT01290653.

References

Año mundial contra el dolor musculoesquelético (Octubre 2009–Octubre 2010). http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=2009_2010_Musculoskeletal_Pain&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=9310 (accessed 30 May 2011).

Fernández-de-las-Peñas

, Alonso-Blanco

, Miangolarra

J.C.

Myofascial trigger points in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a blinded, controlled study. Man Ther 2007; 12: 29–33.

Simons

D.G.

, Travell

J.G.

, Simons

L.S.

Travell and Simons's Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, 1999.

Dommerholt

, Mayoral-del-Moral

, Gröbli

Trigger point dry needling. J Man Manipulative Ther 2006; 14: E70–87.

Perreault

, Kelln

, Hertel

Short-term effects of strain counterstrain in reducing pain in upper trapezius tender points. Athl Train Sports Health Care 2009; 1: 215.

Jones

Strain and Counterstrain. Indianapolis, Indiana: American Academy of Osteopathy, 1981.

Lewis

, Khan

, Souvlis

A randomised controlled study examining the short-term effects of strain-counterstrain treatment on quantitative sensory measures at digitally tender points in the low back. Man Ther 2010; 15: 536–41.

Itoh

, Katsumi

, Hirota

Randomised trial of trigger point acupuncture compared with other acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck pain. Complement Ther Med 2007; 15: 172–9.

Mejuto-Vázquez

M.J.

, Salom-Moreno

, Ortega-Santiago

Short-term changes in neck pain, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion after the application of trigger point dry needling in patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 252–60.

10.

Llamas-Ramos

, Pecos-Martín

, Gallego-Izquierdo

Comparison of the short-term outcomes between trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy for the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 852–61.

11.

Sciotti

V.M.

, Mittak

V.L.

, DiMarco

Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle. Pain 2001; 93: 259–66.

12.

U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Chapter 9—Alcoholic Beverages. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 2005: 43–6.

13.

Andrade Ortega

J.A.

, Delgado Martínez

A.D.

, Almécija Ruiz

Validation of the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E114–18.

14.

Carreon

L.Y.

, Glassman

S.D.

, Campbell

M.J.

Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 2010; 10: 469–74.

15.

Price

D.D.

, McGrath

P.A.

, Rafii

The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45–56.

16.

Lee

J.S.

, Hobden

, Stiell

I.G.

Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 1128–30.

17.

Fischer

A.A.

Application of pressure algometry in manual medicine. J Man Med 1990; 5: 145–50.

18.

Cummings

, Baldry

Regional myofascial pain: diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007; 21: 367–87.

19.

Lucas

, Macaskill

, Irwig

Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 80–9.

20.

Stude

, Nebel

, Lüdecke

Quantification of acute neck pain following whiplash injury by computer-aided pressure algesimetry. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 1067–75.

21.

Macdonald

A.J.

Abnormally tender muscle regions and associated painful movements. Pain 1980; 8: 197–205.

22.

Gerwin

R.D.

, Shannon

, Hong

C.Z.

Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain 1997; 69: 65–73.

23.

Sterling

Testing for sensory hypersensitivity or central hyperexcitability associated with cervical spine pain. Osteopatía Científica 2009; 4: 20–2.

24.

Hong

Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73: 256–63.

25.

Tsai

, Hsieh

, Kuan

Remote effects of dry needling on the irritability of the myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 89: 133–40.

26.

Carlesso

L.C.

, Macdermid

J.C.

, Santaguida

L.P.

Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy: application to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 455–63.

27.

Jensen

M.P.

, Chen

, Brugger

A.M.

Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain 2003; 4: 407–14.

28.

Woolf

C.J.

Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 2011; 152: S2–15.

29.

Nijs

, Van Houdenhove

, Oostendorp

R.A.

Recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain: application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice. Man Ther 2010; 15: 135–41.

30.

Dommerholt

Dry needling—peripheral and central considerations. J Man Manip Ther 2011; 19: 223–7.

31.

Walton

D.M.

, Macdermid

J.C.

, Nielson

Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011; 41: 644–50.

32.

Brady

, McEvoy

, Dommerholt

Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists. J Man Manip Ther 2014; 22: 134–40.

33.

Young

S.B.

, Aprill

, Braswell

Psychological factors and domains of neck pain disability. Pain Med 2009; 10: 310–18.