Spiritual/religious coping has proven to be a fertile ground for investigating health-related spirituality in action. Ken Pargament and his colleagues have successfully demonstrated that spiritual/religious coping differs significantly from previously identified coping strategies. While much has been accomplished to date, there are undeveloped theoretical and methodological avenues that appear to provide important promise for understanding the complexities of this critical domain of coping. Some scholars have failed to conceptualize and research spiritual/religious coping as a contextual, temporally bounded process. This paper explores the theoretical and methodological advantages of adopting a contextually embedded, process-oriented epistemology—contextual action theory. We propose that doing so will not only address some of the inadequacies of the extant literature but also aid researchers in exploring novel dimensions of spiritual/religious coping. From a contextual action-theory perspective, spiritual/religious coping is viewed as intentional, goal-directed behaviour that is embedded in a social and relational context. This teleonomic reconceptualization enables researchers to understand the constitution and development of intentions involved in the process of spiritual/religious coping over time. Further, a contextual action theory perspective transcends the narrow, individualistic lens of coping and explores joint and collective coping processes that emerge as people draw upon spiritual/religious practices to cope with distress. Thus, spiritual/religious coping is embedded in social and relational context and as part of personal, intentional goal-directed processes over time. The novel contributions of a contextual theoretical perspective to spiritual/religious coping research and theory are illustrated through a case example.
AnscombeE. (2000). Intention, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2.
BaerR.A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 10, 125–143.
3.
BarendregtM. & van RappardJ.F.H. (2004). Reductionism revisited: On the role of reduction in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 14, 453–474.
4.
BelzenJ.A. (1999). The cultural psychological approach to religion. Theory & Psychology, 9, 229–255.
5.
BoeschE.E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology.Berlin: Springer.
6.
BodenmannG.PihetS. & KayserK. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493.
7.
ButterE.M. & PargamentK.I. (2003). Development of a model for clinical assessment of religious coping: Initial validation of the process evaluation model. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 6, 175–194.
8.
ChenY-H. (2006). Coping with suffering: The Buddhist perspective. In WongP.T.P. and WongL.C.J., editors, Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping.New York: Springer.
9.
CoyneJ.C. & GottliebB.H. (1996). The mismeasure of coping by checklist. Journal of Personality, 64, 959–991.
10.
CoyneJ.C. & RacioppoM.W. (2000). Never the twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American Psychologist, 55, 655–664.
11.
EmmonsR.A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns.New York: Guildford Press.
12.
EmmonsR.A. & PaloutzianR.F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377–402.
13.
EwartC.K. (1991). Social action theory for public health psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 931–946.
14.
FabricatoreA.N.RandalP.J.RubioD.M. & GilnerF.H. (2004). Stress, religion, and mental health: Religious coping in mediating and moderating roles. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 97–108.
15.
FolkmanS. & MoskowitzJ.T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745–774.
16.
FolkmanS. & MoskowitzJ.T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55, 647–654.
17.
FranklV.E. (1984). Man's search for meaning: Revised and updated.New York: Washington Square Press.
18.
GallT.L.CharbonneauC.ClarkeN.H.GrantK.JosephA. & ShouldiceL. (2005). Understanding the nature and role of spirituality in relation to coping and health: A conceptual framework. Canadian Psychology, 46, 88–104.
19.
GallT.L. & CornblatM.W. (2002). Breast cancer survivors give voice: A qualitative analysis of spiritual factors in long-term adjustment. Psycho-Oncology, 11, 524–535.
20.
GrahamM.D.YoungR.A.ValachL. & WoodR.A. (2007). Addiction as a complex social process: An action theoretical perspective. Addiction Research & Theory, 16, 2, 121–133.
21.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action, (vols. I-II). Boston, MA: Beacon.
22.
HackneyC.H. & SandersG.S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.
23.
HarrisonM.O.KoenigH.G.HaysJ.C.Eme-AkwariA.G. & PargamentK.I. (2001). The epidemiology of religious coping: A review of recent literature. International Review of Psychiatry, 13, 86–93.
24.
HillP.C. & PargamentK.I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist, 58, 64–74.
25.
KeefeF.J.AffleckG.LefebvreJ.UnderwoodL.CaldwellD.S.DrewJ., (2001). Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The role of daily spirituality and daily religious and spiritual coping. The Journal of Pain, 2, 101–110.
26.
KlaassenD.W.McDonaldM. & JamesS. (2006). Advances in the study of religious and spiritual coping. In WongP. T. P. and WongL. C. J., editors, Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping.New York: Springer.
27.
KoenigH.G.McCulloughM.E. & LarsonD.B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
LängleA. (2005). Das Sinnkonzept V. Frankls—ein Beitrag für die gesamte Psychotherapie. In PetzoldH.G. and OrthI., editors, Sinn, Sinnerfahrung, Lebenssinn in Psychologie und Psychotherapie (Vol. 2). Bielefeld/Locarno: Aisthesis.
29.
LazarusR.S. & FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York: Springer.
30.
LazarusR.S. (1995). Vexing research problems inherent in cognitive-mediational theories of emotion—and some solutions. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 183–196.
31.
LazarusR.S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis.New York: Springer.
32.
LazarusR. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665–673.
33.
MahoneyA.PargamentK.I.TarakeshwarN. & SwankA.B. (2001). Religion in the home in the 1980s and 1990s: A meta-analytic review and conceptual analysis of links between religion, marriage, and parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 559–596.
34.
MattisJ.S. (2002). Religion and spirituality in the meaning-making and coping experiences of African American women: A qualitative analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 309–321.
35.
MichelK. & ValachL. (1997). Suicide as goal-directed action. Archives of Suicide Research, 3, 213–221.
36.
MobergD.O. (2002). Assessing and measuring spirituality: Confronting dilemmas of universal and particular evaluative criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 47–60.
37.
OaklandS. & OstellA. (1996). Measuring coping: A review and critique. Human Relations, 49, 133–155.
38.
PaloutzianR.F. & ParkC. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality.New York: Guildford Press.
39.
PargamentK.I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping.New York: Guildford.
40.
PargamentK.I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 3–16.
41.
PargamentK.I. (2002a). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168–181.
42.
PargamentK.I. (2002b). Is religion nothing but …? Explaining religion versus explaining religion away. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 239–244.
43.
PargamentK.I.AnoG.G. & WachholtzA.B. (2005). The religious dimension of coping: Advances in theory, research and practice. In: PaloutzianR.F. & ParkC.L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, pp. 479–495. New York: Guildford Press.
44.
PargamentK.I.KoenigH.G. & PerezL.M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 519–543.
45.
PargamentK.I.KoenigH.G.TarakeshwarN. & HahnJ. (2004). Religious coping methods as predictors of outcomes of psychological, physical, and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 713–730.
46.
PargamentK.I.SmithB.W.KoenigH.G. & PerezL. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 710–724.
47.
PargamentK.I.ZinnbauerB.J.ScottA.B.ButterE.M.ZerowinJ. & StanikP. (1998). Red flags and religious coping: Identifying some religious warning signs among people in crisis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 77–89.
48.
ParkC.L. (2006). Religiousness and religious coping as determinants of stress-related growth. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28, 287–302.
49.
ParkC.L. & FolkmanS. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115–144.
50.
ParsonsT. (1949). The structure of social action.Glencoe, NY: Free Press.
51.
PendletonS.M.CavalliK.S.PargamentK.I. & NasrC.Z. (2002). Religious/spiritual coping in childhood cystic fibrosis: A qualitative study. Pediatrics, 109, 8–19.
52.
RadleyA. (1996). Social psychology and health: Framing the relationship. Psychology and Health, 11, 629–635.
53.
RatnerC. & LuiL. (2001). Theoretical and methodological problems in cross-cultural psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 67–94.
54.
ShwederR.A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207–222.
55.
SiegelK.AndermanS.J. & SchrimshawE.W. (2001). Religion and coping with health-related stress. Psychology and Health, 16, 631–653.
56.
SilversteinL.B. (2006). Integrating feminism and multiculturalism: Scientific fact or science fiction? Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 37, 21–28.
57.
SmithT.B.McCulloughM.E. & PollJ. (2003). Religiousness and depression: Evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 614–636.
58.
SommerfieldM.R. & McCraeR.R. (2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances and clinical applications. American Psychologist, 55, 620–625.
59.
StoneA.A.SchwartzJ.E.NealeJ.M.ShiffmanS.MarcoC.A.HickcoxM. (1998). A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1670–1680.
60.
TarakeshwarN.PargamentK.I. & MahoneyA. (2003). Initial development of a measure of religious coping among Hindus. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 607–628.
61.
TarakeshwarN.StantonJ. & PargamentK.I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 377–394.
62.
TaylorC. (1964). The explanation of behavior.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
63.
TennenH.AffleckG.ArmeliS. & CarneyM.A. (2000). A daily process approach to coping: Linking theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 55, 626–636.
64.
TixA.P. & FrazierP.A. (1998). The use of religious coping during stressful life events: Main effects, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 411–422.
65.
ToddM.TennenH.CarneyM.A.ArmeliS. & AffleckG. (2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310–319.
66.
ValachL. (1995). Coping and human agency. In MarkovaI. and FarrR. (Eds.), Representation of health, illness and handicap.London: Harwood Academic.
ValachL. & YoungR.A., (2004). Some cornerstones in the development of a contextual action theory of career and counselling. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4, 61–81.
69.
ValachL.YoungR.A. & LynamM.J. (1996). Family health-promotion projects: An action theoretical perspective. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 49–63.
70.
ValachL.YoungR.A. & LynamM.J. (Eds.) (2002). Action theory: A primer for applied research in the social sciences.New York: Praeger.
71.
von CranachM.KalbermattenU.IndermühleK. & GuglerB. (1982). Goal-directed action(M. Turton, Trans.). London: Academic Press. (Original work published 1980).
72.
WatsonP.J.MorrisR.J.HoodR.W.Jr.MillironJ.T. & StutzN.L. (1998). Religious orientation, identity, and the quest for meaning in ethics within and ideological surround. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8, 149–164.
73.
WongP.T.P. & WongL.C.J. editors (2006). Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping.New York: Springer.
74.
YoungR.A. & CollinA. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 373–388.
75.
YoungR.A.LoganC.LovatoC.Y.MoffatB. & ShovellerJ.A. (2005). Sun projection as a family health project in families with adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 333–344.
76.
YoungR.A.MarshallS.DomeneJ.F.Arato-BolivarJ.HayounR.MarshallE., (2006). Relationships, communication, and career in the parent-adolescent projects of families with and without challenges. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 1–23.
77.
YoungR.A.MarshallS.K.DomeneJ.F.GrahamM.D.LoganC.Zaidman-ZaitA. (2007). Family transition to adulthood study. Unpublished raw data.
78.
YoungR.A. & ValachL. (2000). Reconceptualizing career psychology: An action theoretical perspective. In CollinA. and YoungR. A. (Eds.), The future of career.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79.
YoungR.A. & ValachL. (2004). The construction of career through goal-directed action. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 499–514.
80.
YoungR.A. & ValachL. (2008). Action theory: An integrative paradigm for research and evaluation in career. In AthanasouJ. & van EsbroeckR. (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance. Springer-Science.
81.
YoungR.A.ValachL.BallJ.PaseluikhoM.A.WongY.S.DeVriesR.J., (2001). Career development as a family project. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 190–202.
82.
YoungR.A.ValachL. & CollinA. (1996). A contextual explanation of career. In BrownD. and BrooksL. (Eds.), Career counseling and development (3rd ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83.
YoungR.A.ValachL. & CollinA. (2002). A contextual explanation of career. In BrownD. and Associates, Career choice and development (4th ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84.
YoungR.A.ValachL. & DomeneJ.F. (2005). The action-project method in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 215–223.
85.
ZinnbauerB.J. & PargamentK.I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F. and ParkC. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality.New York: Guilford Press.
