The theologian Hugo Rahner argued that the homo ludens is a man of ‘Ernstheiterkeit’ (serious-cheerfulness), a person who can smile under tears but also recognizes the gravity in all earthly cheerfulness. The primary aim of this study was to test the validity of this notion: Do homines ludentes exist? Two hundred sixty-three adult subjects were measured for (1) seriousness and cheerfulness and (2) playfulness. Results provided unequivocal support for Rahner's thesis. Numerous subjects scored high in both seriousness and cheerfulness thus confirming the existence of homines ludentes. It was further found that these subjects were among those scoring highest in playfulness. Subjects scoring high in cheerfulness but low in seriousness were, however, even more closely associated with playfulness. The scores for homines ludentes did not differ from the rest of the subjects in the creative and dynamic facets of playfulness. The importance of developing empirical research to investigate hypotheses derived from non-scientific concepts is discussed.
AmabileT.M.HillK.G.HennesseyB.A., & TigheE.M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66(5), 950–967.
BarnettL.A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, Vol. 3, 319–336.
4.
BarnettL.A. (1991a). The playful child: Measurement of a disposition to play. Play and Culture, Vol. 4, 51–74.
5.
BarnettL.A. (1991b). Characterizing playfulness: Correlates with individual attributes and personality traits. Play and Culture, Vol. 4, 371–393.
6.
BarnettL.A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 43(4), 949–958.
7.
BarnettL.A. (2012). Playful people: Fun is in the mind of the beholder. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, Vol. 31(3), 169–197.
8.
BeermannU., & RuchW. (2009). How virtuous is humour? What we can learn from current instruments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 4(6), 528–539.
CaputoJ.D. (1997). The prayers and tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without religion.Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
11.
Carretero-DiosH.EidM., & RuchW. (2011). Analyzing multitrait-mulitmethod data with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis: An application to the validation of the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 45(2), 153–164.
12.
CoxH. (1973). The feast of fools—A theological essay on festivity and fantasy.New York, NY: Harper Colophon Books.
13.
DroogersA. (2006). The third bank of the river: Play, methodological ludism and the definition of religion. In DroogersA.ClarkeP. B.DavieG.GreenfieldS. M., & VersteegP. (Eds.), Playful religion: Challenges for the study of religion (pp. 75–96). Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
14.
FredricksonB.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, Vol. 56(3), 218–226.
15.
GervaisM., & WilsonD.S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humour: A synthetic approach. Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 80(4), 395–430.
16.
GlynnM.A., & WebsterJ. (1992). The Adult Playfulness Scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, Vol. 71, 83–103.
17.
GlynnM.A., & WebsterJ. (1993). Refining the nomological net of the Adult Playfulness Scale: Personality, motivational, and attitudinal correlates for highly intelligent adults. Psychological Reports, Vol. 72, 1023–1026.
18.
KaufmannG. (2004). In the beginning… creativity.Minneapolis, IL: Fortress Press.
19.
KierkegaardS. (1910). Abschließende unwissenschaftliche Nachschrift zu den philosophischen Brocken (2. Teil) [Concluding unscientific postscripts to the philosophical fragments (part 2)]. Jena, Germany: Diederichs.
20.
KöhlerG., & RuchW. (1996). Sources of variance in current sense of humour inventories: How much substance, how much method variance?Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Vol. 9(3/4), 363–397.
21.
LiebermanN.J. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity.New York, NY: Academic Press.
22.
McGheeP.E. (1996). Health, healing and the amuse system: Humor as survival training.Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
23.
MorreallJ. (1983). Taking laughter seriously.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
24.
MüllerL., & RuchW. (2011). Humor and strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 6(5), 368–376.
25.
OerterR. (1999). Psychologie des Spiels [Psychology of play].Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
26.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
ProyerR.T. (2011). Being playful and smart? The relations of adult playfulness with psychometric and self-estimated intelligence and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 21(4), 463–467.
28.
ProyerR.T. (2012a). A psycho-linguistic study on adult playfulness: Its hierarchical structure and theoretical considerations. Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 19(3), 141–149.
29.
ProyerR.T. (2012b). Development and initial assessment of a short measure for adult playfulness: The SMAP. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 53(8), 989–994.
30.
ProyerR.T. (2012c). Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological functioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, Vol. 54(2), 103–127.
31.
ProyerR.T., & RuchW. (2011). The virtuousness of adult playfulness: The relation of playfulness with strengths of character. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 1(4).
32.
ProyerR.T.RuchW., & MüllerL. (2010). Sense of humour among the elderly: Findings with the German version of the SHS. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, Vol. 43(1), 19–24.
33.
QianX.L., & YarnalC. (2011). The role of playfulness in the leisure stress-coping process among emerging adults: An SEM analysis. Leisure/Loisir, Vol. 35(2), 191–209.
34.
RahnerH. (1954). Eutrapelie, eine vergessene Tugend [Eutrapelia, a forgotten virtue]. Geist und Leben, Vol. 27, 346–353.
35.
RahnerH. (1965). Man at play or did you ever practice eutrapelia?London, England: Burns & Oates.
36.
RahnerH. (2008). Der spielende Mensch [Man at play] (11th ed.). Einsiedeln, CH: Johannes. (orig. published 1948).
37.
RäwelJ. (2005). Humor als Kommunikationsmedium [Humor as a communication medium]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
38.
RuchW. (1994). Temperament, Eysenck's PEN system, and humour-related traits. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Vol. 7(3), 209–244.
39.
RuchW., & HofmannJ. (2012). A temperament approach to humour. In GremigniP. (Ed.), Humor and health promotion (pp. 79–112). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
40.
RuchW.KöhlerG., & van ThrielC. (1996). Assessing the “humorous temperament”: Construction of the facet and standard trait forms of the State-Trait-Cheerfulness-Inventory—STCI. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9(3/4), 303–339.
41.
SaridO.MelzerI.KurzI.ShaharD.R., & RuchW. (2010). The effect of helping behaviour and physical activity on mood states and depressive symptoms of elderly people. Clinical Gerontologist, Vol. 33(4), 270–282.
42.
SaroglouV. (2002). Religion and sense of humour: An a priori incompatibility? Theoretical considerations from a psychological perspective. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, Vol. 15(2), 191–214.
43.
SaroglouV., & JaspardJ.-M. (2001). Does religion affect humour creation? An experimental study. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, Vol. 4(1), 33–45.
44.
SchaffP. (1889) (Ed.). On the priesthood, ascetic treatises, selected homilies and letters, homilies on the statutes (Vol. 9 of a select library of Nicene and Post-Nicene fathers of the Christian church). New York, NY: The Christian Literature Co.
45.
SnowC.P. (1959). The two cultures.London: Cambridge University Press.
46.
VersteegP. (2006). Playing religion: Experience, meaning and the ludic approach. In DroogersA.ClarkeP.B.DavieG.GreenfieldS.M., & VersteegP. (Eds.), Playful religion: Challenges for the study of religion (pp. 97–108). Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
47.
YuP.WuJ.-J.ChenI., & LinY.-T. (2007). Is playfulness a benefit to work? Empirical evidence of professionals in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Measurement, Vol. 39(3/4), 412–429.
