The literature is inconclusive regarding the relationship between place attachment and risk perception. Place attachment relates to reduced risk perception in some contexts and higher levels in others. Furthermore, longitudinal studies have shown that this relationship can change over time. In order to elucidate this relationship, we explored the multidimensionality of risk perception using the Slovic et al. paradigm with three types of risks: environmental, social and economic. A sample of 157 residents reported both place attachment and perceived risk. The results show that place attachment contributes to amplifying high probability risks and attenuates the perception of low probability ones. The results further show that place attachment is associated with the “control of risk” dimension including “voluntariness” and “controllability”.
References
1.
AspinwallL. G.BrunhartS. M. (1996). Distinguishing optimism from denial: Optimistic beliefs predict attention to health threats.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 993–1003.
2.
AspinwallL. G.TaylorS. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping.Psychological Bulletin, 121, 417–436.
3.
BickerstaffK.WalkerG. (2001). Public understandings of air pollution: The localisation of environmental risk.Global Environmental Change, 11, 133–145.
4.
BilligM. (2006). Is My Home My Castle? Place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith.Environment and Behavior, 38, 248–265.
5.
BonaiutoM.BreakwellG.CanoI. (1996). Identity processes and environmental threat: The effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution.Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 157–175.
6.
BrownB. B.PerkinsB. B.BrownG. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 259–271.
7.
BurninghamK.ThrushD. (2004). Pollution concerns in context: A comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory.Journal of Risk Research, 7, 213–232.
8.
CombsB.SlovicP. (1979) Causes of death: biased newspaper coverage and biased judgments. Journalism Quarterly, Columbia, 56, 837–849.
9.
DallagoL.PerkinsD. D.SantinelloM.BoyceW.MolchoM.MorganA. (2009). Adolescent place attachment, social capital, and perceived safety: a comparison of 13 countries.American Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 148–60.
10.
Devine-WrightP.HowesY. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy study.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271–280.
11.
DroseltisO.VignolesV. L. (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 23–34.
12.
DunlapR. E.GallupG.GallupA. (1993). Global environmental concern: Results from an international public survey.Environment, 35, 7–39.
13.
FélonneauM. L. (2004). Love and loathing of the city: urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 43–52.
14.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
15.
GiffordR.ScannellL.KormosC.SmolovaL.BielA.BoncuS.UzzellD. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
16.
GoochG. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States.Environment and Behavior, 27, 513–539.
17.
GreenbergM. (2009). Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data.Energy Policy, 37, 3242–3249.
18.
HarlanS. L.LarsenL.HackettE. J.WolfS.BolinB.HopeD. (2005). Neighborhood attachment in urban environments. In Paper presented at the Annual Sociological Association, Philadelphia.
19.
HatfieldJ.JobR. F. S. (2001). Optimism bias about environmental degradation: the role of the range of impact of precautions.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 17–30.
20.
HernandezB.HidalgoM. C.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.HessS. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and no-natives.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319.
21.
LewickaM. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35–51.
22.
LewickaM. (2011) Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–130.
23.
LimaM. L. (2003). Terramotos, amor e outras coisas perigosas: uma abordagem psicossociológica da percepção de riscos. In M. L. Lima, Castro, P. E Garrido, M. (Org.), Temas e Debates em Psicologia Social (pp. 225–246). Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
24.
LimaM. L.MarquesS. (2005). Towards successful social impact assessment follow-up: A case study of psychosocial monitoring of a solid waste incinerator in the north of Portugal.Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23, 227–233.
25.
NewmanO. (1996). Creating defensible space. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
26.
NuttinJ. M. (1987) Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 381–402.
27.
PahlS.HarrisP. R.ToddH. A.RutterD. R. (2005). Comparative optimism for environmental risks.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 1–11.
ParkhillK. A.PidgeonN. F.HenwoodK. L.SimmonsP.VenablesD. (2010). From the familiar to the extraordinary: Local residents' perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 39–58.
30.
PolE.CastrechiniA. (2002). City-Identity-Sustainability Network: Final Words.Environment and Behavior, 34, 150–160.
31.
RadcliffeN. M.KleinW. M. P. (2002) Dispositional, unrealistic, and comparative optimism: differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 836–846.
32.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.BridgesM. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.
33.
SchultzP. W.GouveiaV. V.CameronL. D.TankhaG.SchmuckP.FraneK.M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457–475.
34.
SlovicP. (1987). Perception of Risk.Science. New Series, 236, No. 4799 (Apr. 17, 1987), pp. 280–285.
35.
SpenceA.PoortingaW.PidgeonN. (2012). The Psychological distance of climate change.Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972.
36.
UzzellD. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307–318.
37.
VanDERPligtJ. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour.British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 1–14.
38.
VenablesD.PidgeonN. F.ParkhillK. A.HenwoodK. L.SimmonsP. (2012). Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 371–383.
39.
VorkinnM.RieseH. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment.Environment & Behaviour, 33, 249–263.
40.
WakefieldS.ElliottS.ColeD.EylesJ. (2001). Environmental risk and (re)action: Air quality, health, and civic involvement in an urban industrial environment.Health and Place, 7, 163–177.
41.
WeinsteinN. D.KlotzM. L.SandmanP. M. (1988). Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon.American Journal of Public Health, 78, 796–800.
42.
WilliamsB.BrownS.GreenbergM. (1999). Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah River nuclear weapons site.Environment & Behaviour, 31, 354–371.
43.
WillisH. H.DekayM. L.FischhoffB.MorganM. G. (2005). Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions.Risk Analysis, 25, 405–428.
