Recent Advances in Hearing Aid Selection and Adjustment

Abstract

Recent research has shown that speech is most intelligible for hearing-impaired individuals when it is amplified to a comfortable level in specific frequency regions between 250 and 6,000 Hz, and is limited below the discomfort level. If commercial hearing aids and earmold coupling are adjusted appropriately, they will provide amplified sound within these parameters for most hearing-impaired individuals. A clinical procedure is described 1) to preselect an aid and earmold with the approximate electroacoustic characteristics that are needed, 2) to determine the gain actually provided by this hearing aid/earmold combination, and 3) to adjust the hearing aid and/or earmold if the gain and maximum output do not meet the prescribed criteria, or if the wearer finds the sound quality unacceptable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Skinner

. The hearing of speech during language acquisition. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 631–50.

Watson

Knudsen

. Selective amplification in hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1940; 11: 406–19.

Lippmann

Braida

Durlach

. Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 524–34.

Pascoe

. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84 (suppl 23) :1–40.

Skinner

Karstaedt

Miller

. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1982; 21: 251–68.

Skinner

Miller

. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1983; 22: 253–79.

Skinner

Pascoe

Miller

Popelka

. Measurements to determine the optimal placement of speech energy in the listener's auditory area: A basis for selecting amplification characteristics. In: Studebaker

Bess

, eds. The Vanderbilt hearing-aid report: State of the art — Research needs. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology. Upper Darby, Pa: 1982: 161–9.

Pascoe

. An approach to hearing aid selection. Hear Instr 1978; 29: 12–16, 36.

Pascoe

Miller

Skinner

Albee

Freiert

Hack

. Evaluation of the Pascoe hearing-aid procedure. Central Institute for the Deaf Periodic Progress Report 1980; 23: 51.

10.

Owens

Schubert

. Development of the California Consonant Test. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 463–74.

11.

Popelka

Engebretson

. A computer-based system for hearing aid assessment. Hear Instr 1983; 34, 7: 6–7, 9, 44.

12.

Walden

Schwartz

Williams

Holum-Hardegen

Crowley

. Test of the assumptions underlying comparative hearing aid evaluations. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 264–73.

13.

Cox

Hawkins

Skinner

. Strategies and decision making in hearing aid selection. Miniseminar presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Cincinnati, 1983.

14.

Hawkins

Yacullo

. The signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 1984 (in press).

15.

Skinner

Miller

DeFilippo

Dawson

Popelka

. Word identification by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss using four amplification systems. Paper presented at the Scott Reger Memorial Conference, Iowa City, Iowa, April 12–14, 1984.

16.

Sullivan

Neuman

Levitt

. Adaptive estimation of frequency-gain characteristics for binaural hearing aids. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Cincinnati, 1983.