There are a variety of methods for treating unilateral vocal cord paralysis, but to date there have been few studies that compare these phonosurgical techniques by using objective measures of voice improvement. Vocal efficiency is an objective voice measure that is defined as the ratio of the acoustic power produced by the larynx to the subglottic air power. Vocal efficiency has been found to decrease with glottic disorders such as vocal cord paralysis and carcinoma. This study compared the effects of vocal fold medialization by surgical augmentation to those of arytenoid adduction on the vocal efficiency, videostroboscopy, and acoustics (jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio) of a simulated unilateral vocal cord paralysis in an in vivo canine model. Arytenoid adduction was superior to surgical augmentation in vocal efficiency, traveling wave motion, and acoustics.
ArnoldGE. Vocal rehabilitation of paralytic dysphonia. VIII. Phoniatric methods of vocal compensation. Arch Otolaryngol1962; 76: 76–83.
2.
IsshikiNOkamuraHIshikawaT. Thyroplasty type I (lateral compression) for dysphonia due to vocal cord paralysis or atrophy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1975; 80: 465–73.
CrumleyRLIzdebskiKMcMickenB. Nerve transfer versus Teflon® injection for vocal cord paralysis: A comparison. Laryngoscope1988; 98: 1200–4.
5.
TuckerHMRusnovM. Laryngeal reinnervation for unilateral vocal cord paralysis: Long-term results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1981; 90: 457–9.
6.
SmithMEBerkeGS. The effects of phonosurgery on laryngeal vibration: Part 1. Theoretic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1990; 103: 380–90.
7.
Van den BergJW. Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1956; 8: 1–24.
8.
KoyamaTHarveyJEOguraJH. Mechanics of voice production. III. Efficiency of voice production. Laryngoscope1972; 82: 210–7.
9.
TanakaSTanabeM. Glottal adjustment for regulating vocal intensity. An experimental study. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1986; 102: 315–24.
10.
IwataS. Aerodynamic aspects for phonation in normal and pathologic larynges. In: FujimuraO, ed. Vocal physiology: Voice production, mechanisms and functions. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1988: 423–31.
11.
TanakaSGouldWJ. Vocal efficiency and aerodynamic aspects in voice disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1985; 94: 29–33.
12.
LudlowCCoulterDGentgesF. The differential sensitivity of frequency perturbation to laryngeal neoplasms and neuropathologies. In: BlessDMAbbsJH, eds. Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press, 1983: 381–92.
13.
MilenkovicP. Least mean squares measures of voice perturbation. J Speech Hear Res1987; 30: 529–38.
14.
LiebermanP. Some acoustic measurements of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathologic larynges. J Acoust Soc Am1963; 35: 344–53.
ZyskiBBullGMcDonaldWJohnsM. Perturbation analysis of normal and pathologic larynges. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1984; 36: 190–8.
17.
IwataS. Periodicities of pitch perturbations in normal and pathologic larynges. Laryngoscope1972; 82: 87–96.
18.
FukuzawaTBlaugrundSEl-AssuootyAGouldW. Acoustic analysis of hoarse voice: A preliminary report. J Voice1988; 2: 127–31.
19.
Von LedenHAbitbolABouchayerMHiranoMTuckerH. Phonosurgery. J Voice1989; 3: 175–82.
20.
RubinHJ. Histologic and high-speed photographic observations on the intracordal injection of synthetics. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1966; 70: 909–21.
21.
Von LedenHYanagiharaNWerner-KukukE. Teflon in unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Preoperative and postoperative function studies. Arch Otolaryngol1967; 85: 666–74.
22.
RontalERontalMRolnickMI. The use of spectrograms in the evaluation of vocal cord injection. Laryngoscope1975; 85: 47–56.
23.
DedoH. Avoidance and treatment of complications of Teflon injection of the vocal cord. J Voice1988; 2: 90–2.
24.
TrappTKBerkeGSBellTSHansonDGWardPH. Effect of vocal fold augmentation on laryngeal vibration in simulated recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis: A study of Teflon and Phonogel. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1989; 98: 220–7.
25.
LewyRB. Teflon injection of the vocal cord: Complications, errors, and precautions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1983; 92: 473–4.
26.
CormierYKashimaHSummerW. Subclinical reduction in airflows after Teflon injection of vocal cord. Laryngoscope1980; 90: 1027–31.
27.
Payer. Plastik am Schildknorpel zur Behebung der Folgan einseitiger Stimmbandlahmung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr1915; 43: 1265–70.
28.
MeurmanY. Operative mediofixation of the vocal cord in complete unilateral paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol1952; 55: 544–53.
29.
IsshikiNMoritaHOkamuraHHiramotoM. Thyroplasty as a new phonosurgical technique. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1974; 78: 451–7.
30.
IsshikiN. Recent advances in phonosurgery. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1980; 32: 119–54.
31.
KoufmanJA. Laryngoplasty for vocal cord medialization: An alternative to Teflon®. Laryngoscope1986; 96: 726–31.
32.
EscajadilloJR. Technique for external repositioning of the paralyzed vocal cord with Silastic implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1988; 97: 234–8.
33.
MorrisonLF. The “reverse King operation.” A surgical procedure for restoration of phonation in cases of aphonia due to unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1948; 57: 945–56.
34.
MontgomeryWW. Cricoarytenoid arthrodesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1966; 75: 380–91.
35.
HirotoI. Surgical voice improvement for unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, Otol Fukuoka (Jibi To Rinsho)1976; 22: 473–6.
TitzeIR. Regulation of vocal power and efficiency by subglottal pressure and glottal width. In: FujimuraO, ed. Vocal physiology: Voice production, mechanisms and functions. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1988: 227–37.
38.
IsshikiN. Phonosurgery: External laryngeal surgery not requiring entry into the vocal tract. In: ArnoldGEWinckelBD, eds. Surgical care of voice disorders. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag, 1984: 59–84. (Disorders of human communication; vol 8.).
39.
IsshikiNKitajimaKKojimaHHaritaY. Turbulent noise in dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1978; 30: 214–24.
40.
CrumleyRLIzdebskiK. Voice quality following laryngeal reinnervation by ansa hypoglossi transfer. Laryngoscope1986; 96: 611–6.
41.
BerkeGSHansonDHTrappTKMooreDMGerrattBRNatividadM. Office-based system for voice analysis. Arch Otolaryngol1989; 115: 74–7.
42.
SataloffRTSpiegelJRCarrollLMDarbyKSRulnickRK. Objective measures of voice function. Ear Nose Throat J1987; 66: 307–12.
43.
BastianRW. Factors leading to successful evaluation and management of patients with voice disorders. Ear Nose Throat J1988; 67: 411–20.
44.
BastianRWLevineLA. Visual methods for the office diagnosis of voice disorders. Ear Nose Throat J1988; 67: 363–79.
45.
ThumfartWF. Electrodiagnosis of laryngeal nerve disorders. Ear Nose Throat J1988; 67: 380–93.
46.
D'AntonioLNetsellRLotzW. Clinical aerodynamics for the evaluation and management of voice disorders. Ear Nose Throat J1988; 67: 394–9.
