This paper is an account of one aspect of a self-study—the ‘roundtable reflections’—conducted over two semesters with two cohorts of Bachelor of Education preservice teachers at the University of Ballarat. An innovative approach to learning and teaching mathematics based on negotiation, ‘commuting’ teaching experience, and systematic reflection was introduced with each cohort and roundtable sessions provided the reflective space for the systematic ‘unpacking’ of the learning. Analysis of these roundtable sessions has developed understandings of the impact and effectiveness of this approach in redefining the role of both the pre-service teacher and the teacher educator as ‘co-learners’. The implications for those involved in teacher education are explored as a means of further understanding the nature of teaching and learning about teaching.
Australian Council of Deans of Education. (2001). New learning: A charter for Australian education. Canberra: Author.
2.
BerryA.LoughranJ. (2002). Developing an understanding of learning to teach in teacher education. In LoughranJ.RussellT. (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 13–29). London: Routledge-Falmer.
BrandenburgR.RyanJ. (2001, December). From ‘Too little too late’ to ‘This is the best part’: Students’ perceptions of changes to the practicum placement in teaching. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, WA.
5.
BrookfieldS. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BurnK.HaggerH.MuttonT. (2003). The complex development of student-teachers’ thinking. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 309–331.
7.
DayC. (1999). Researching teaching through reflective practice. In LoughranJ. (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 215–232). London: Falmer Press.
8.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
FeldmanA. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 26–28.
11.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin.
12.
GoreJ. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
13.
HamiltonM.L.PinnegarS. (2000) On the threshold of a new century: Trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 234–240.
14.
HayesT. (2002). Teacher professionalism and the new ‘gradgrindery’: What's happening with standards? Preparing educators for the twenty-first century. Professional Educator, 1(1), 2–5.
15.
KeatingP. (2003). [Address to the graduates of the Faculties of Commerce and Economics, University of New South Wales].
16.
KinchloeJ.L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
17.
KorthagenF.A. J.KesselsJ.KosterB.LagerwerfB.WubbelsT. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
18.
La BoskeyV.K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of preservice teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
LortieD. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
LoughranJ. (2003, May). [Self study seminar, University of Ballarat].
21.
LoughranJ. (Ed.). (1999). Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy. London: Falmer Press.
22.
LoughranJ. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
