This study reports an eclectic evaluation of a language program. The evaluation involved a formative phase (to develop a theoretical framework of language pragmatics, to develop materials and strategies); and a summative phase (a field trial involving pre-post outcome measures, student and teacher perceptions of the program, and the application by an external evaluator of the LoU scale of the measure of adoption of an innovation). The outcomes were consistent with the expectations generated by the theory of language pragmatics and learning-in-context. Important insights were gained into aspects of classroom organization and the level of adoption of program innovations by teachers.
AlkinM.C. (1972). Towards an evaluation model: A systems approach. In TaylorP.A.CowleyD.M. (Eds.), Readings in Curriculum Evaluation. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown.
2.
AsherS.R.WigfieldA. (1981). Training referential skills. In DicksonW.P. (Ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Australian Council for Educational Reserach (n.d.). ACER Junior Non-verbal Test. Hawthorn, Vic.: ACER.
4.
BernsteinB. (Ed.) (1975). Class, Codes and Control (Vol. 3). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5.
BloomB.S.HastingsJ.T.MadausG.F. (1971). Handbook of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
6.
BullockA. (Chairman) (1975). A Language for Life: Report of the Committee of Enquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science. London: HMSO.
7.
BrownA.L.BransfordJ.D.FerraraR.A.CampionJ.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In MussenD. (Ed.), Carmichael Manual of Child Development. New York: Wiley.
8.
BrunerJ.S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
9.
BullockA. (Chairman) (1975). A Language for Life: Report of the Committee of Enquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science. London: HMSO.
10.
ColeM. (1978). The Cultural Context of Learning and Thinking. New York: Basic Books.
11.
CornoL. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 278–92.
12.
DicksonW.P. (1981). Referential communication activities in research: A meta-analysis. In DicksonW.P. (Ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press.
13.
DonmoyerR. (1979). The evaluator as artist: A discussion of premises and problems with examples from two aesthetically based evaluations. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.
14.
EisnerE.W. (1975). The perceptive eye: Toward the reformation of educational evaluation. Occasional paper of the Stanford Evaluation Consortium, December 1975.
15.
EisnerE.W. (1979a). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan.
16.
EinserE.W. (1979b). The use of qualitative forms of evaluation for improving educational practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 11–19.
17.
EvansG.GeorgeffM.PooleM. (1980). Training in information selection for communication. Australian Journal of Education, 24, 137–54.
18.
FeuersteinR. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore, Ma.: University Park Press.
19.
FlavellJ.H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In DicksonW.P. (Ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press.
GuthrieL.F. (1981). The task variable in children's language use: Cultural and situational differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
22.
GuthrieL.F.HallW.S. (1983). Continuity/discontinuity in the function and use of language. In GordonE.W. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 10) pp. 55–77. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
23.
HallG.E. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analysing innovation and adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 52–6.
24.
JenkinsJ.W. (1949). Jenkins Intermediate Non-verbal Test. Hawthorn, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
25.
LombardA.SamC. (1967). Headstart Research and Evaluation Office, UCLA: Appendix to Annual Report. Los Angeles: US Educational Resources Information Center. (microfiche).
26.
MacdonaldB. (1971). The evaluation of the Humanities Curriculum Project: A holistic approach. Theory into Practice, 10, 163–7.
27.
MarkmanE.M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–92.
28.
MarkmanE.M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In DicksonW.P. (Ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press.
29.
NevoD. (1983). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: an analytical review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 117–28.
30.
OlsonD.R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77, 257–73.
31.
OwensT.R. (1973). Educational evaluation by adversary proceedings. In HouseE.R. (Ed.), School Evaluation: The Politics and the Process. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan.
32.
ParlettM. (1972). Evaluating innovations in teaching. In ButcherH.J.RuddE. (Eds), Contemporary Problems in Higher Education. London: McGraw Hill.
33.
ParlettM.DeardenG. (Eds.) (1977). Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education. Cardiff-by-the-Sea, Calif: Pacific Soundings Press.
34.
ParlettM.HamiltonD. (1972). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs. (Occasional Paper 9). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences.
35.
PooleM.E.EvansG.T. (In press). Learning oral communication strategies in classroom settings.
36.
ReichardtC.S.CookT.D. (Eds) (1979). Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
ScrivenM. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In StakeR.E. (Ed.), Curriculum Evaluation (AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation No. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.
39.
ScrivenM. (1983). Evaluation as a paradigm for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 10 (3), 5–18.
40.
ShawK.E. (1978). Understanding the curriculum: The approach through case studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, 1–17.
41.
SmithL.M. (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. Review of Research in Education, 6, 316–77.
42.
StakeR.E. (Ed.) (1975). Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsiveness Approach. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
43.
StufflebeamD.L.FoleyW.J.GephartW.J.GubaE.G.HammonR.L.MerrimanH.O.ProvusM.M. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. Itasai, Ill.: Peacock.
44.
VygotskyL.S. (1962). Thought and Language (HaufmannE.VakasG. trans.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
45.
WillisG. (Ed.) (1978). Qualitative Evaluation: Concepts and Cases in Curriculum Criticism. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan.
46.
WolfR.L. (1979). The use of judicial evaluation methods in the formulation of educational policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 19–28.
47.
WortmanP.M. (1983). Evaluation research: a methodological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 223–60.
48.
YoungR.E. (1983). A school communication-deficit hypothesis of educational disadvantage. Australian Journal of Education, 27, 3–16.
