Background. Intensive efforts are aimed at understanding student attributes in anticipation that this will lead to effective knowledge translation (KT) strategies. One attribute of interest is practice style trait: four have been identified ranging from the seeker, who is driven by scientific evidence, to the pragmatist, who is driven by practicality. Purpose. To identify the prevalence of the four traits among student clinicians and explore associations between these traits, clinician characteristics and practice behaviours. Methods. Ninety-two occupational therapy and 86 physical therapy students completed a survey that elicited information on traits, clinician characteristics, and practice behaviours. Findings. The most prevalent trait was pragmatic, the least, seeker at <1%. The most prevalent reason for choosing an intervention was “it was used by my clinical supervisor”. Implications. Educators should carefully reconsider the implication of using KT strategies that cater primarily to seekers. Research is warranted to explore the impact of matching educational strategies to traits.
CochranW.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
4.
CoxD. R., & SnellE. J. (1989). Analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.
5.
DavisD., EvansM., JadadA., PerrierL., RathD., RyanD. (2003). The case for knowledge translation: Shortening the journey from evidence to effect. British Medical Journal, 327, 33–35.
6.
Ehrmann-FeldmanD., ChampagneF., Korner-BitenskyN., & MechefedjianG. (2002). Waiting time for pediatric rehabilitation services for children with physical disabilities. Child Care Health Development, 28, 351–358.
7.
GreenL. A., GorenfloD. W., & WyszewianskiL. (2002). Validating an instrument for selecting interventions to change physician practice patterns: A Michigan Consortium for Family Practice Research study. Journal of Family Practice, 51, 938–942.
8.
GrimshawJ. M., EcclesM. P., WalkerA. E., & ThomasR. (2002). Changing physicians' behaviour: What works and thoughts on getting more things to work. Journal of Continuing Education of Health Professionals, 22, 237–243.
9.
GrimshawJ. M., ShirranL., ThomasR., MowattG., FraserC., BeroL. (2001). Changing provider behaviour: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care, 39 (8 Suppl 2): II2–145.
10.
JetteD. U., BaconK., BattyC., CarlsonM., FerlandA., HemingwayR.D. (2003). Evidence based practice: Beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviours of physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 83, 786–805.
11.
KamwendoK., & TörnquistK. (2001). Do occupational therapy and physiotherapy students care about research? A survey of perceptions and attitudes to research. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 15, 295–302.
12.
Korner-BitenskyN., Menon-NairA., ThomasA., BoutinE., & ArafahM. A. (2007). Practice style traits — Do they explain practice behaviours of stroke rehabilitation professionals?Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 685–692.
13.
McCluskeyA., & LovariniM. (2005). Providing education on evidence based practice improved knowledge but did not change behaviour: A before and after study. BMC Medical Education, 5, 1–12.
14.
McGill Occupational Therapy Program. (2003). Curriculum Document Accreditation. (Volume III). McGill University, School of Physical & Occupational Therapy: Montreal, Québec.
15.
MikhailC., Korner-BitenskyN., RossignolM., & DumasJ.P. (2005). Physical therapists' use of interventions with high evidence of effectiveness in the management of a hypothetical typical patient with acute low back pain. Physical Therapy, 85, 1151–1167.
16.
WyszewianskiL., & GreenL. A. (2000). Strategies for Changing Therapists' Practice Patterns: A New Perspective. Journal of Family Practice, 49, 461–464.
