Improving Developmental Screening in Pediatric Resident Education

Abstract

Objective. Given that pediatricians cite low competency in developmental screening, this study aims to effectively teach screening to residents. Design. Using a quasiexperimental design, residents received an educational module and one-on-one teaching of 3 validated developmental screeners (Denver II, ASQ [Ages and Stages Questionnaire], and PEDS [Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status]), with subsequent independent use with all 3 screeners with their own continuity patients. Outcome measures included changes in knowledge, skills, and preferences. Results. All residents achieved significantly increased skills with all screeners. They strongly preferred the ASQ (70%), citing that this taught them normal (30.2%) and pathological (27.9%) development while negatively noting time (72.1%), scheduling issues (30.2%), and difficulties with child cooperation (20.9%). Knowledge specifics did not significantly increase. Conclusions. In-depth developmental screening education revealed marked improvement in skills and preferences. These evaluations led to full adoption of the ASQ in resident clinics. Future research must test if effective development teaching in residency leads to increased routine screenings in practice.

Keywords

medical education developmental screening pediatrics

References

Council on Children with Disabilities. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118:405-420.

Hix-Small H. , Marks K. , Squires J. , Nickel R. Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2007;120:381-389.

Halfon N. , Regalado M. , Sareen H. , et al. Assessing development in the pediatric office. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6 suppl): 1926-1933.

Sand N. , Silverstein M. , Glascoe FP , Gupta VB , Tonniges TP , O’Connor KG

Pediatricians’ reported practices regarding developmental screening: do guidelines work? Do they help?

Pediatrics. 2005;116:174-179.

Anderson LM , Shinn C. , Fullilove MT , et al. The effectiveness of early childhood development programs: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3 suppl):32-46.

Sices L. Use of developmental milestones in pediatric residency training and practice: time to rethink the meaning of the mean. J Dev Behav Pediatr . 2007;28:47-52.

Sices L. , Feudtner C. , McLaughlin J. , Drotar D. , Williams M. How do primary care physicians identify young children with developmental delays? A national survey. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24:409-417.

Dobrez D. , Sasso AL , Holl J. , Shalowitz M. , Leon S. , Budetti P. Estimating the cost of developmental and behavioral screening of preschool children in general pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2001;108:913-922.

Barratt MS , Moyer VA Pediatric resident and faculty knowledge of the Denver II. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:411-413.

10.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Pediatrics menu. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/navPages/nav_320.asp. Accessed September 22, 2009.

11.

Nicol P. Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to teach medical students developmental assessment: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:29.

12.

van Agt HM , van der Stege HA , de Ridder-Sluiter H. , Verhoeven LT , de Koning HJ A cluster-randomized trial of screening for language delay in toddlers: effects on school performance and language development at age 8. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1317-1325.

13.

Bailey DB Jr , Hebbeler K. , Spiker D. , Scarborough A. , Mallik S. , Nelson L. Thirty-six-month outcomes for families of children who have disabilities and participated in early intervention. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1346-1352.

14.

Drotar D. , Stancin T. , Dworkin PH , Sices L. , Wood S. Selecting developmental surveillance and screening tools. Pediatr Rev. 2008;29:e52-e58.

15.

Rydz D. , Srour M. , Oskoui M. , et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires . Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1178-e1186.

16.

Denver Develomental Materials, Inc. Denver II. http://www.denverii.com/home.html. Accessed September 10, 2009.

17.

Ages and Stages Questionnaire. http://www.agesandstages.com/. Accessed June 10, 2009.

18.

Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status. http://www.pedstest.com/. Accessed June 10, 2009 .

19.

Theeranate K. , Chuengchitraks S. Parent’s Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) detects developmental problems compared to Denver II. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(suppl 3):S188-S192.

20.

Sices L. , Stancin T. , Kirchner HL , Bauchner H. PEDS and ASQ developmental screening tests may not identify the same children . Pediatrics. 2009;124:e640-e647.

21.

Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006.

22.

Schweinfurth J. Interactive instruction in otolaryngology resident education. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2007;40: 1203-1214.

23.

Dewberry GP Jr , Johnson CA , Holmes GE , Liese BS A strategy to improve developmental screening during well baby visits. Fam Med. 1986;18:355-357.

24.

Felt BT , O’Connor ME Use of the child development review increases residents’ discussion of behavioral problems. Ambul Pediatr. 2003 ;3:2-8.

25.

Nalven LM , Hofkosh D. , Feldman H. , Kelleher K. Teaching pediatric residents about early intervention and special education . J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1997; 18:371-376.