This article analyses the dynamics of the world order, as well as the nature of public diplomacy conducted through both global and national media of communication, within a theoretical framework derived from the fundamental concepts associated with Eastern philosophy, world-systems analysis and the theory of living systems (encompassing the paradigms of cognition, autopoiesis and dissipative structures). First, it explains the clash of classical physics and new physics that has opened the door for new theoretical directions for the social sciences. Second, it explains the theory of living systems, which offers a paradigm shift for the social sciences. Third, it looks at the nature of public diplomacy and the methods used by competing elements in the centre-periphery structure of the world system to influence public opinion. Fourth, it concludes that because all living systems, including the world-system, are predominantly non-linear and thermodynamically far from equilibrium, the clash of antinomic ideologies will never cease. Moreover, because no observer can hope to accurately measure the initial conditions of the coherent superposition of public diplomacy, empirical science cannot predict the boomerang-and-bullet effects of public diplomacy.
BAKER, P. L. (1993) ‘Chaos, Order, and Sociological Theory’ , Sociological Inquiry63(2): 123-149 .
2.
BARBER, B. (1984) Strong Democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
3.
BARTON, J. H. and HUNCHUCK, A. M. (2000) ‘All That is Solid Melts in Air: World Systems Theory’ , Perspectives3 ; at: www.aabss.org/journal2000/f06Barton.jmm.html (accessed 17 July 2004).
4.
BECKER, T. and SLATON, C. D. (2000) The Future of Teledemocracy. Westport, CT: Praeger .
5.
BENAVIDES, J. L. (2000) ‘Gacetilla: A Keyword for a Revisionist Approach to the Political Economy of Mexico’s Print News Media’ , Media, Culture and Society22: 85-104 .
6.
BHASKAR, R. (1999) Interview, The Philosophers’ Magazine No. 8.
7.
BOSWELL, T. and CHASE-DUNN, C. (2000) The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
8.
BRASCH, W. M. and ULLOTH, D. R. (eds) (1986) The Press and the State: Sociohistorical and Contemporary Studies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America .
9.
CAPRA, F. (1996) The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Doubleday .
10.
CAPRA, F. (1999) The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism, 4th updated edn.Boston, MA: Shambhala . (Orig. pub. 1975.)
11.
CAPRA, F. (2002) Hidden Connections: Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability. New York: Doubleday .
12.
CASTELLS, M. (1996) The Information Age, Vol. 1. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell .
13.
COOK, T. E. (1998) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press .
14.
CRITCHLOW, J. (2004) ‘Public Diplomacy during the Cold War: The Record and its Implications’ (Review essay) , Journal of Cold War Studies6(1): 75-89 .
15.
CURRAN, J. and SEATON, J. (2003) Power without Responsibility: The Press, Broadcasting, and New Media in Britain, 6th edn.London: Routledge .
16.
DATOR, J. A. (1984) ‘Quantum Theory and Political Design’ , paper presented at the Dutweiller Institute conference.
17.
DENEMARK, R. A. , FRIEDMAN, J. , GILLS, B.K. and MODELSKI, G. (eds) (2000) World-System History: The Social Science of Long-Term Change. London: Routledge .
18.
DIZEREGA, G. (1991) ‘Integrating Quantum Theory with Postmodern Political Thought and Action: The Priority of Relationships over Objects’, in T. L. Becker (ed.) Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena. New York: Praeger .
19.
FITZPATRICK, K. R. (2004) ‘US Public Diplomacy’ , Vital Speeches of the Day70(13): 412-417 .
20.
FORTNER, R. S. (1993) International Communication: History, Conflict, and Control of the Global Metropolis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
21.
FRANK, A. G. and GILLS, B. K. (1993) The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand?London: Routledge .
22.
FREDERICK, H. H. (1993) Global Communication and International Relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
23.
GILBOA, E. (2000) ‘Mass Communication and Diplomacy: A Theoretical Framework’ , Communication Theory10: 275-309 .
24.
GOSWAMI, A. (1993) The Self-Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam .
25.
GOSWAMI, A. (2000) The Visionary Window: A Quantum Physicist’s Guide to Enlightenment. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books .
26.
GUNARATNE, S. A. (1975) The Taming of the Press in Sri Lanka, Journalism Monographs No. 39. Lexington, KY: Association for Education in Journalism .
27.
GUNARATNE, S. A. (2001) ‘Paper, Printing, and the Printing Press: A Horizontally Integrative Macrohistory Analysis’ , Gazette63: 459-479 .
28.
GUNARATNE, S. A. (2002) ‘Freedom of the Press: A World System Perspective’ , Gazette64: 343-369 .
29.
GUNARATNE, S. A. (2005) The Dao of the Press: A Humanocentric Theory. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press .
30.
HACHTEN, W. A. and SCOTTON, J. F. (2002) The World News Prism: Global Media in an Era of Terrorism, 6th edn.Ames, IA: Iowa State Press .
31.
HALL, T. D. (1996) ‘World-System and Evolution: An Appraisal’ , Journal of World Systems Research2(4): 1-43 .
32.
HERBERT, N. (1985) Quantum Reality. New York: Doubleday .
33.
HESS, S. (1984) The Government/Press Connection: Press Officers and Their Offices. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution .
34.
HESS, S. and KALB, M. (eds) (2003) Media and the War on Terrorism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press .
35.
HIRST, P. and THOMPSON, G. (1996) Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press .
36.
KAUFMAN, E. (2002) ‘A Broadcasting Strategy to Win Media Wars’ , The Washington Quarterly25(2): 115-127 .
37.
LANDAU, M. (1961) ‘On the Use of Metaphor in Political Analysis’ , Social Research28: 331-363 .
38.
LUHMANN, N. (1992) ‘Autopoiesis: What is Communication?’ , Communication Theory2: 251-258 .
39.
LUHMANN, N. (1995) Social Systems, trans J. Bednarz Jr with D. Baecker. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press . (Orig. pub. 1984.)
40.
LUHMANN, N. (2000) The Reality of the Mass Media, trans. K. Cross. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press . (Orig. pub. 1996.)
41.
MCCHESNEY, R. W. (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press .
42.
MANSFIELD, V. (1990) ‘Relativity in Madhyamika Buddhism and Modern Physics’ , Philosophy East and West40(1): 59-72 .
43.
MATURANA, H. (2002) ‘Autopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition: A History of These and Other Notions in the Biology of Cognition’ , Cybernetics and Human Knowing9(3): 5-34 .
44.
MATURANA, H. and VARELA, F. (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel .
45.
MIIKE, Y. (2003) ‘Beyond Eurocentrism in the Intercultural Field: Searching for an Asiacentric Paradigm’, in W. J. Starosta and G.-M. Chen (eds) Ferment in the Intercultural Field: Axiology/Value/Praxis, pp. 243-276. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
46.
MURSCHETZ, P. (1998) ‘State Support for the Daily Press in Europe: A Critical Appraisal’ , European Journal of Communication13: 291-313 .
47.
NEUMAN, J. (1996) ‘The Media’s Impact on International Affairs, Then and Now’ , SAIS Review16(1): 109-123 .
48.
NISBET, E. C. , NISBET, M. C. , SCHEUFELE, D. A. and SHANAHAN, J. E. (2004) ‘Public Diplomacy, Television News, and Muslim Opinion’ , The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9(2): 11-37 .
49.
OVERMAN, E. S. (1991) ‘Policy Physics’, in T. L. Becker (ed.) Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena, pp. 151-167. New York: Praeger .
50.
PONDER, S. (1998) Managing the Press: Origins of the Media Presidency, 1897-1933. New York: St Martin’s Press .
51.
PREW, P. (2003) ‘The 21st Century World-Ecosystem: Dissipation, Chaos, or Transition?’, in W. A. Dunaway (ed.) Emerging Issues in the 21st Century World-System Vol. 2: New Theoretical Directions for the 21st Century World-System, pp. 203-219. Westport, CT: Praeger .
52.
PRICE, M. E. (2002) Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and its Challenge to State Power. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press .
53.
PRIGOGINE, I. and STENGERS, I. (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto: Bantam Books .
54.
ROSS, C. (2002) ‘Public Diplomacy Comes of Age’ , The Washington Quarterly25(2): 75-83 .
55.
ROSS, C. (2003) ‘Pillars of Public Diplomacy: Grappling with International Public Opinion’ , Harvard International Review25(2): 22-28 .
56.
RUSSELL, R. J. , CLAYTON, P. , WEGTER-MCNELLY, K . and POLKINGHORNE, J . (eds) (2001) Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action Vol. 5. Berkeley, CA: Center for Theology and Natural Sciences .
57.
SCHUBERT, G. (1983) ‘The Evolution of Political Science Paradigms of Physics, Biology, and Politics’ , Politics and Life Sciences1(2): 98-124 .
58.
SLATON, C. D. (1991) ‘Quantum Theory and Political Theory’, in T. L. Becker (ed.) Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena, pp. 41-63. New York: Praeger .
59.
SNOW, N. (2004) ‘How to Build an Effective US Public Diplomacy’ , Vital Speeches of the Day70(12): 369-375 .
60.
SWYNGEDOUW, E. (1992) ‘Territorial Organization and the Space/Technology Nexus’ , Transactions, Institute of British Geographers17: 417-433 .
61.
URRY, J. (2003) Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press .
62.
VICKERS, R. (2004) ‘The New Public Diplomacy: Britain and Canada Compared’ , British Journal of Politics and International Relations6(2): 182-195 .
63.
WALBY, S. (2003) ‘Complexity Theory, Globalization, and Diversity’ , paper presented to conference of the British Sociological Association, University of York, April.
64.
WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974) The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press .
65.
WALLERSTEIN, I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
66.
YU, B. and LU, Z. (2000) ‘Confucianism and Modernity - Insights from an Interview with Tu Wei-ming’ , China Review International7: 377-387 .
67.
ZAHARNA, R. S. (2003) ‘The Unintended Consequences of Crisis Public Diplomacy: American Public Diplomacy in the Arab World’ , Foreign Policy in Focus8(2): 1 .
68.
ZUKAV, G. (1979) The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics. New York: William Morrow and Co .
