FriedmanL. (Ed.) Argument: The oral argument before the supreme court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 1952-55. New York, Chelsea House, 1969, 51.
2.
GarrisonM.Jr. & HammillD.Who are the retarded?Exceptional Children, 1971.
3.
Hobson v. Hansen, 269F. Supp.401, 497 (D.D.C.1967).
4.
Kuriloff, Kirp, & Buss. Legal reform of special education: Empirical studies and procedural propsoals. California Law Review, 1974, 40.
5.
Lebank v. Spears, 60F.R.D.135 (E.D. La.1973).
6.
Mill V.D.C. Board of Education, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972).
7.
New York State Association for Retarded Children Inc. v. Rockefeller, 357 F. Supp. 752 (1973).
8.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972).
9.
P.L. 93-380; U.S. Code Section 1413 (13).
10.
Sweatt v. Painter, 339U.S.629, 634 (1950).
11.
United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144, 152–53 n. 4 (1938).
12.
Wyatt v. Stickney, 344F. Supp.387 (M.D. Ala.1972) affirmed sub. nom.