The rapid adoption of minimum competency tests (MCT) as a necessary condition for a high school diploma has focused attention upon a variety of educational and social issues. Of particular significance is the effect of MCT on the mildly mentally retarded high schooler. This paper reviews the disadvantages, as well as the advantages, of competency tests upon this special population. Alternatives to using MCT as a criterion for earning a diploma are suggested within the discussion of the movement's ultimate impact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClarkJ. P., & ThomsonS. D. (1976). Competency tests and graduation requirements. Reston, Va.: Natl. Assoc. of Secondary School Principals.
2.
CoombsJ. R. (1979). Can minimum competency testing be justified?High School Journal, 62, 175–180.
3.
CourtnageL., & StruckJ. (1978). Rights of retarded people to receive regular diplomas and participate in high school graduation exercises. Mental Retardation, 16, 58–59.
4.
DunlapH. G. (1979). Minimum competency testing and the slow learner. Educational Leadership, 36, 327–330.
5.
EbelR. L. (1978). The case of minimum competency testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 546–549.
6.
Education for the Handicapped (Newsletter, Capitol Publ., Washington, D.C.). (1979). 5, 19.
7.
GilmanD. A. (1978). The logic of minimal competency testing. NASSP Bulletin, 62, 56–63.
8.
HaneyW., & MadausG. (1978). Making sense of the competency testing movement. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 462–484.
9.
McClungM. S. (1978). Are competency testing programs fair? legal?Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 397–400.
10.
McClungM. S. (1979). Lawyers, courts and educational policy: The real case of minimal competency testing—A response to Getz and Glass. High School Journal, 62, 243–251.
11.
PinkneyH. B. (1979). The minimum competency movement in public education. Clearing House, 52, 413–416.
12.
RavitchD. C. (1978). Minimum competency testing: The consumer movement in education. The Journal, 3, 1–9. (Institute for Socioeconomic Studies, White Plains, N.Y.).
13.
TurlingtonR. D. (1979). Good news from Florida: Our minimum competency program is working. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 649–651.
14.
WattsD. (1979). Is competency testing the answer?Clearing House, 52, 243–245.
