This article presents the findings of a study that examined how an elementary school faculty made sense of the succession of its principal. The findings suggest that teachers' sense-making was affected by two sets of factors previously identified by research in noneducational settings: a group norm and characteristics of the succession process. The findings also suggest that a general expectation of change and presuccession sense-making affected the manner in which teachers interpreted succession events. The findings of this study suggest several questions to guide future research.
References
1.
Baltzell, D. C. , & Dentler, R. A. (1983). Selecting American school principals: A sourcebook for educators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education.
2.
Brown, M. C. (1982). Administrative succession and organizational performance: The succession effect. Administration Science Quarterly, 27, 1-16.
3.
Calder, B. J. , & Schurr, P. H. (1981). Attitudinal processes in organizations. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 283-302). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4.
Carlson, R. 0. (1961). Succession and performance among school superintendents. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 210-227.
5.
Cohen, M. D. , March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
6.
Cusick, P. A. (Ed.). (1987). Organizational culture and schools [special issue]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4).
7.
Daft, R. L. , & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
8.
Deal, T. E. , & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Fauske, J. R. , & Owaga, R. T. (1987). Detachment, fear, and expectation: A faculty's response to the impending succession of its principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23, 23-44.
10.
Gephart, R. (1978). Status degradation and organization succession. Administration Science Quarterly, 23, 553-581.
11.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Goldman, M. , & Fraas, L. (1964). The effects of leadership selection on group performance. Sociometry, 28, 82-88.
13.
Gordon, G. E. , & Becker, S. (1964). Organizational size and managerial succession: A reexamination. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 215-222.
14.
Gordon, G. E. , & Rosen, N. (1981). Critical factors in leader succession. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 227-254.
15.
Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
16.
Gross, E. , & Etzioni, A. (1985). Organizations in society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Grusky, 0. (1961). Corporate size, bureaucratization and managerial succession. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 261-269.
18.
Grusky, 0. (1963). Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 21-31.
19.
Grusky, 0. (1969). Succession with an ally. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 155-170.
20.
Guest, R. H. (1962). Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 47-54.
21.
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
22.
Hollander, E. P. , & Julian, J. W. (1978). A further look at leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 153-165). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Jackson, J. M. (1953). The effect of changing the leadership of small work groups. Human Relations, 6, 25-44.
24.
Kriesberg, L. (1962). Careers, organization size, and succession. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 355-359.
25.
Lieberman, S. (1956). The effects of changes in roles on the attitudes of role occupants. Human Relations, 9, 385-402.
26.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Merei, F. (1958). Group leadership and institutionalization. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 522-532). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
Miskel, C. , & Cosgrove, D. (1985). Leader succession in school settings. Review of Educational Research, 55, 87-105.
29.
Ott, J. S. (1989). The Organizational Culture Perspective. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
30.
Schatzman, L. , & Strass, A. L. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Berkeley, CA: University of Califomia Press.
32.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-358.
33.
Webb, E. J.,Campell, D. T. , Scwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
34.
Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. In B. Staw (Ed.) Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 41-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
