Berger, Arthur and Speevack, Morris. "An Analysie of the Range of Testing and Scattering Among Retarded Children on Form L of the Revised Stanford-Binet." Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI, 1: 39-44.
2.
Bemreuter, Robert G. and Carr, Edward J. "The Interpretation of IQ'a on the L-M Stanford-Binet." Journal of Educational Paychology , XXIX, 312-14.
3.
Carlton, Theodore. "Performance of Mental Defectives on the Revised Stanford-Binet, Form L." Journal of Consulting Psychology , IV, 2: 61-5.
4.
Harriman, Philip Lawrence. "Irregularity of Successes on the 1937 Stanford Revision." Journal of Consulting Psychology, III, 3: 83-5.
5.
Hildreth, Gertrude. "Retests with the New Stanford-Binet Scale ." Journal of Consulting Psycbology, III, 2: 49-53.
6.
Krugman, Morris. "Some Impressions of the Revised Stanford-Binet Scale." Journal of Educational Paychology, XXX, 8: 594-603.
7.
Munson, Grace and Saffir, Milton A. "A Comparative Study of Re-test Ratings on the Original and Revised Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales." Paper delivered at the American Psychological Association Meeting in California, 1940.
8.
Rheingold, Harriet L. and Perce, Frances C. "Comparison of Ratings on the Original and the Revised Btanford-Binet Intelligence Scales at the Borderline and Mental Defective Levels." Proceedings from theAmerican Association on Mental Deficiency. XLIV (1939), 2: 110-19.
9.
Rider, Paul R.An Introduction to Modern Statistical Metbods. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1939 .
10.
Spearman, Charles. "Measuring Intelligence—A Critical Notice ." Human Factor (London), XI (1937).
11.
Terman, L. M.The Measurement of Intelligence. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1916.
12.
Termen, L.M. and Merrill, M.A.Measuring Intelligence. Boston: Houghton-Miffiin, 1937.