Two basic assumptions made in personal probability testing procedures are reviewed. Some empirical examinee response data are examined and it is suggested that these assumptions should not be taken lightly in empirical studies of personal probability testing procedures.
References
1.
De Finetti, B.Methods for discriminating levels of partial knowledge concerning a test item. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1965, 18, 87-123.
2.
Ebel, R. L.Essentials of educational measurement , Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
3.
Echternacht, G. J.The use of confidence testing in objective tests. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 217-236.
4.
Grant, D. A., Hake, H. W. , and Hornseth, J. P.Acquisition and extinction of a verbal conditioned response with differing percentage of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1951, 42, 1-5.
5.
Hilgard, E. R.Theories of learning, Second Edition, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956.
6.
Humphreys, L. G.Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939, 25, 294-301.
7.
Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley , 1968.
8.
Michael, J. J.The reliability of a multiple-choice examination under various test-taking instructions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 307-314.
9.
Rippey, R. M.Probabilistic testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 211-215.
10.
Rippey, R. M.A comparison of five different scoring functions for confidence tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970, 7, 165-170.
11.
Shuford, E. H., Jr., Albert, A., and Massengill, H. E.Admissible probability measurement procedures. Psychometrika , 1966, 31, 125-145.
12.
Traub, R. E. and Hambleton, R. K.The effect of scoring instructions and degree of speededness on the validity and reliability of multiple-choice tests. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1972, 32, 737-758.
