Although Camp's tetrachoric correlation approximation has been shown to yield excellent results over a fairly wide range, its derivation remains something of a mystery. The present article shows how Camp might have arrived at his formula using a theoretical, rather than an empirical, approach.
References
1.
Camp, B. H. (1934). The mathematical part of elementary statistics. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
2.
Castellan, N. J. (1966). On the estimation of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 31, 67-73.
3.
Cureton, E. E. (1968). Tetrachoric correlation by the Camp approximation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 239-244.
4.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Odeh, R. E. , & Evans, J. O. (1974). Algorithm AS 70: The percentage points of the normal distribution. Applied Statistics, 23, 96-97.
6.
Pearson, K. I. (1901). Mathematical contribution to the theory of evolution: VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 195A, 1-47.
