The aim of this study was to investigate the factorial invariance of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) when administered to deaf children who use sign language. A multisample confirmatory factor analysis, using LISREL7, was used to test the four-factor model on the covariance matrices of subtest scale scores for deaf and standardization samples. The general form of the four-factor model fit for both samples. Path coefficients, error variances, and factor covariances were not invariant, indicating that test constructs may be differentially indicated across groups.
References
1.
American Psychological Association (APA). (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample size in factor analysis models. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part 1) (pp. 149-173). Amsterdam: North Holland.
4.
Cohen, R. J. , Swerdlik, M. E., & Smith, D. K. (1992). Psychological testing and assessment. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.
5.
Gibbins, S. (1989). The provision of school psychological assessment services for the hearing impaired: A national survey. Volta Review, 91(2), 95-103.
6.
Hammill, D. D. , Brown, L., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). A consumer's guide to tests in print (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
7.
Hishinuma, E. S. (1995). WISC-III accommodations: The need for practitioner guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8(3), 130-135.
8.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.
9.
Johnson, R. E. , Liddell, S. K., & Erting, C. J. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
10.
Klima, E. S. , & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Maller, S. J. (1991, August). Cognitive assessment of deaf children: Current issues and future trends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
12.
Maller, S. J. , & Braden, J. P. (1993). The construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III with deaf adolescents. Journal of Psycho educational Assessment, WISC-III Monograph, pp. 105-113.
13.
Paul, P. V. , & Jackson, D. W. (1993). Toward a psychology of deafness. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Roid, G. H. , Prifitera, A., & Weiss, L. G. (1993). Replication of the WISC-III factor structure in an independent sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, WISC-III Monograph, pp. 6-34.
15.
Shaw, S. R. , Swerdlik, M. E., & Laurent, J. (1993). Review of the WISC-III [Review of the test Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, WISC-III Monograph, pp. 151-160.
16.
Sullivan, P. M. , & Burley, S. K. (1990). Mental testing of the hearing-impaired child. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 761-788). New York: Guilford.
17.
Wechsler, D. (1974). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
18.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
