Three categories of beliefs related to consumption-refuse practices were studied in a Mexican community. One hundred randomly selected housewives responded to a questionnaire investigating conservation beliefs, materialistic beliefs, and austerity beliefs, as well as self-reports of reuse and recycling practices. In addition, observations of reused/recycled items were conducted throughout the households studied. Structural equation models of the three categories of beliefs predicting self-reported and observed reuse and recycling were specified and tested. Results revealed that self-reports of conservation (reuse/recycling) behavior were best predicted by beliefs, although significant correlations between observations of reuse/recycling and beliefs were also obtained. Austerity beliefs were better predictors of self-reports of reuse, and conservation beliefs were significantly related to observations of this practice. The reported recycling was more related to materialistic and conservation beliefs, whereas the observed recycling was only predicted by materialistic beliefs.
References
1.
Antil, J. H. (1979). Construction and validation of a scale to measure socially responsible consumption behavior. In K. E. Henion, II & T. C. Kinnear (Eds.), The conserver society. Chicago: Proceeding Series, American Marketing Association.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS, structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
3.
Burn, S. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611-619.
4.
Cary, J. (1993). The nature of symbolic beliefs and environmental behavior in a rural setting. Environment and Behavior, 25, 555-576.
5.
Cialdini, R. B. , Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). Afocus theoryof normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public spaces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
6.
Corral, V. (1995). A model of proenvironmental behavior predicted by dispositional, situational and demographic variables: The case of Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
7.
Corral, V. , Bernache, G., Encinas, L., & Garibaldi, L. C. (1995). A comparison of two measures of reuse and recycling behavior: Self-report & material culture. Journal of Environmental Systems, 23, 313-327.
8.
Cote, J. A. (1984). Use of household refuse analysis to measure usual and period-specific food consumption. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 71-91.
9.
De Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18, 435-449.
10.
De Young, R. (1991). Some psychological aspects of living lightly: Desired lifestyle patterns and conservation behavior. Joumal of Envronmental Systems, 20, 215-227.
11.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1975). Psychology of the Mexcan, culture and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. , & Szalay, L. B. (1991). Understanding Mexicans and Americans: Cultural perspectives in conflict. New York: Plenum.
13.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Van Uere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Sciences Quartery, 65, 1013-1028.
14.
Ebreo, A. , & Vining, J. (1994). Conservation-wise consumers: Recycling household shopping as ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Systems, 23, 109-131.
15.
Ferketich, S. L. , Figueredo, A. J., & Knapp, T. R. (1991). Focus on psychometrics, the multitrait-multimethod approach to construct validity. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 315-320.
16.
Fishbein, M. , & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Gamba, R. J. , & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents' participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587-612.
18.
Geller, E. S. (1985). The behavior change approach to litter management. Journal of Resource Management and Technology, 14, 117-122.
19.
Goldenhar, L. M. , & Connell, C. M. (1993). Understanding and predicting recycling behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Environmental Systems, 22, 91-103.
20.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) . (1992). Sistema para la Consulta de Información Censal (SCINCE). Mexico, D.F.: Author.
21.
Katzev, R. D. , & Johnson, T. R. (1987). Promoting energy conservation: An analysis of behavioral research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
Lansana, F. M. (1992). Distinguishing potential recyclers from non-recyclers: A basis for developing recycling strategies. Journal of Environmental Education, 23, 16-23.
23.
Linn, N. , Vining, J., & Feeley, P. A. (1994). Toward a sustainable society: Waste minimization through environmentally conscious consuming. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1550-1572.
24.
McGuire, R. H. (1984). Recycling, great expectations and garbage outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 93-114.
25.
Rathje, W. L. (1989). The three faces of garbage—Measurements, perceptions and behavior. Journal of Resources Management and Technology, 17, 61-65.
26.
Restrepo, I., Bernache, G., & Rathje, W. L. (1991). Los demonios del consumo. Basura y contaminación. Mexico: Centro de Ecodesarrollo.
27.
Rose, D. (1983). National beverage container deposit legislation: A cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12, 71-84.
28.
Samdahl, D. M. , & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern. Specification and test of the model. Environment and Behavior, 22, 767-786.
29.
Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. American Psychologist, 47, 1224-1232.
30.
Tracy, A. , & Oskamp, S. (1984). Relationships among ecologically responsible behaviors. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 115-126.
31.
Vining, J. , & Ebreo, A. (1989). An evaluation of the public response to a community recycling education program. Society and Natural Resources, 2, 23-36.
32.
Weigel, R. H. (1977). Ideological and demographic correlates of proecology behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 39-47.
