This study describes special education alternative route (AR) teacher preparation programs. The authors developed a national database of programs and collected information on program sponsorship, length and intensity, features, and participant demographics. Most of the 235 programs in the database were in states that had significant shortages of special education teachers, and the authors received 101 responses to the survey. Active collaboration and use of professional standards in program development were commonplace. Most programs required full-time teaching, although the length of preteaching preparation varied dramatically, as did overall program length. Although many participants were general education teachers or recent degree recipients, the largest subgroup consisted of midcareer changers. This article discusses these findings and provides recommendations for additional research.
References
1.
BoeE. E.CookL. H.BobbittS. A.TerhanianG. (1998). The shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21 (1), 1–21.
2.
ConnellyV. J. (2003, November). An analysis of alternatively prepared teachers using the school and staffing survey. Paper presented at the meeting of the Teacher Education Division, Biloxi, MS.
3.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: The standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators (5th ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
4.
DaiC.DenslowD.DeweyJ.SindelarP. T.RosenbergM. S. (2006). Economic analysis and the design of alternative route teacher education programs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards. Quality Teaching, 9, 3–4.
6.
FeistritzerC. E.ChesterD. T. (2001). Alternative teacher certification. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
7.
FeistritzerC. E.HaarC. K.HobarJ. H.ScullionA. B. (2005). Alternative teacher certification. Washington DC: National Center for Education Information.
8.
GeigerW. L.CrutchfieldM. D.MainzerR. (2003). The status of licensure of special education teachers in the 21st century (COPSSE Document No. RS-7). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
9.
GoldhaberD. D. (2004). Why do we license teachers? In HessF. M.RotherhamA. J.WalshK. (Eds.), A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas (pp. 81–100). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
10.
HardmanM. L.MulderM. A. (2003). Federal education reform: Critical issues in public education and the impact on students with disabilities. Eagle Summit on Personnel Preparation in Behavior and Emotional Disorders. Dallas: University of North Texas.
11.
HasselB. C.SherburneM. E. (2004). Model 2: Cultivating success through multiple providers: A new state strategy for improving the quality of teacher preparation. In HessF. M.RotherhamA. J.WalshK. (Eds.), A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas (pp. 201–222). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
12.
HawleyW. D. (1992). The theory and practice of alternative certification: Implications for the improvement of teaching. In HawleyW. D. (Ed.), The alternative certification of teachers (pp. 3–34). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
13.
HessF. M.RotherhamA. J.WalshK. (Eds.). (2004). A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14.
HillkirkR. K. (2000). Effective models for alternative programs in teacher education. In McIntyreD. J.ByrdD. M. (Eds.), Research on effective models for teacher education (Association of Teacher Educators Yearbook No. 8; pp. 195–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
15.
HumphreyD. C.WeschlerM. E. (2005). Insights into alternative certification: Initial findings from a national study. Teachers College Record. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12145.
16.
NeelR. S.CessnaK. K.BorockJ.BechardS. (2003). Quality program indicators for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 12 (3), 3–9.
17.
RosenbergM. S.RockE. E. (1994). Alternative certification in special education: Efficacy of a collaborative, field-based teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 141–153.
18.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T. (1998). The impact of market driven higher education practices on professional teacher development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 227–235.
19.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T. (2001). The proliferation of alternative routes to certification in special education: A critical review of the literature. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
20.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T. (2005). The proliferation of alternative routes to certification in special education: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 39, 117–127.
21.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T.HardmanM. L. (2004). Preparing highly qualified teachers for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: The impact of NCLB and IDEA. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 266–278.
22.
RotherhamA. J.MeadS. (2004). Back to the future: The history and politics of state teacher licensure and certification. In HessF. M.RotherhamA. J.WalshK. (Eds.), A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas (pp. 11–47). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
23.
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. (1999). The teachers we need and how to get more of them: A manifesto. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
TylerN. C.YzquierdoZ.Lopez-ReynaN.FlippinS. S. (2004). Cultural linguistic diversity and the special education workforce: A critical overview. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 22–38.
25.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: The Secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Alternative routes to certification. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Data. Annual Report Tables. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.ideadata.org/.
28.
ZeichnerK. M.SchulteA. K. (2001). What we know and don't know from peer reviewed research about alternative certification programs. Teacher Education, 52, 266–282.
29.
ZemskyR. (1993). Consumer markets and higher education. Liberal Education, 79, 14–17.
