AnastasiA.Psychological testing. (2nd ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1961.
2.
ArmstrongJ. R.The relationship of mathematics curriculum innovation presented through two methods and effect upon achievement as a function of learner ability. Vol. I & II. US Office of Education Final Report No. BR7-E-109, PA24, April, 1968.
3.
ArmstrongJ. R.Curricular and instructional factors which facilitate mathematical learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 1969, 38 (2), 5–15. (a)
4.
ArmstrongJ. R.Mathematics curriculum innovation and evaluation for educable mentally retarded. US Office of Education Final Report, Project No. 592206, September, 1969. (b)
5.
ArmstrongJ. R.Teaching: An ongoing process of assessing, selecting, developing, generalizing, applying, and reassessing. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1969, 4, 168–176. (c)
6.
ArmstrongJ. R.An educational process model for use in research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1970, 39(1), 2–7.
7.
BloomB. S. (Ed.) Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook. I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 1956.
8.
ConbachL. J.Validation of educational measures. In ThorndikeR. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1969.
9.
GagnéR. M.The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 355–365.
10.
GagnéR. M., MayorJ. R., GarstensH. L., & ParadiseN. E.Factors in acquiring knowledge of a mathematical task. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76 (7, Whole No. 526).
11.
GagnéR. M., & ParadiseN. E.Abilities and learning sets in knowledge acquisition. Psychological Monographs, 1961, 75(14, Whole No. 518).
12.
HawkesH. E., LindquistE. F., & MannC. R.The construction and use of achievement examinations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1936.
