Issues surrounding the implementation of the integration imperative during infancy and early childhood present formidable challenges to education and community providers. Key among these issues is how professionals provide high-quality services to young children with disabilities in mainstream environments. This article explores current issues related to integration and reexamines the concept of “best practices” as it applies to mainstreaming during the early childhood years. The author recommends an integrated set of indicators for high-quality programs and describes an outcomes-based process for making administrative and pedagogical decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauwensJ.HourcaseJ. J.FriendM. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17–24.
2.
BennisW.NanusB. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
BiklenD. (1985). Achieving the complete school. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BlumR. E. (1985). Outcome-based schools: A definition. Outcomes, 5(1), 1–5.
5.
BredekampS. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
BrickerD. D.CripeJ. (1990). Activity-based intervention. In BrickerD. (Ed.), Early intervention for at-risk and handicapped infants, toddlers, and preschool children (pp. 251–274). Palo Alto, CA: VORT.
7.
BrickerD. D.VeltmanM. (1990). Early intervention programs: Child focused approaches. In ShonkoffJ.MeiselsS. (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (pp. 373–399). London: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChambersA.SalisburyC.PalombaroM.ColeG. (1990). Developing commitment to inclusive educational practices. Manuscript in preparation.
9.
GartnerA.LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Education Review, 57(4), 367–395.
10.
Gaylord-RossR. (1989). Integration strategies for students with handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
11.
GuralnickM. J., (1981). The efficacy of integrating handicapped children in early education settings: Research implications. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(1), 57–72.
12.
GuralnickM. J. (1990). Major accomplishments and future directions in early childhood mainstreaming, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 1–17.
13.
HanlineM. F. (1990). A consulting model for providing integration opportunities for preschool children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(4), 360–366.
14.
HoysonM.JamiesonB.StrainP. S. (1984). Individualized group instruction for normally developing and autistic-like children: The LEAP curriculum. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 8, 157–172.
15.
MamaryA. (1985). The Outcomes-Driven Developmental Model. Johnson City, NY: Johnson City Central School District.
16.
McCollumJ.McCartanK. (1986). Research in teacher education: Issues and future directions for early childhood special education. In OdomS.KarnesM. (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps (pp. 269–286). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
McDonnellA.HardmanM. (1988). A synthesis of “best practice” guidelines for early childhood services. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12(4), 328–341.
18.
McLeanM. B.HanlineM. F. (1990). Providing early intervention services in integrated environments: Challenges and opportunities for the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 62–77.
19.
MeyerL. H.EichingerJ.Park-LeeS. (1987). A validation of program quality indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(A), 251–263.
20.
OakesJ. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181–199.
21.
OdomS. L.McEvoyM. A. (1990). Mainstreaming at the preschool level: Potential barriers and tasks for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 48–61.
22.
OdomS. L.StrainP. S. (1984). Peer mediated approaches to increasing children's social interaction: A review. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 544–557.
23.
PearpointJ. (1989). Reflections on a quality education for all students. In StainbackS.StainbackW.ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 249–254). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
PeckC. A.HaydenL.WandschniederM.PetersonK.RicharzS. (1989). Development of integrated preschools: A qualitative inquiry into sources of resistance among parents, administrators, and teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(4), 353–363.
25.
PowellD. R. (1989). Families and early childhood programs. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
26.
PugachM.JohnsonL. J. (1989). The challenge of implementing collaboration between general and special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 232–235.
27.
PurkeyS. D.SmithM. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427–452.
28.
RainforthB.SalisburyC. L. (1988). Functional home programs: A model for therapists. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7(4), 33–45.
29.
SalisburyC. L. (1989). Translating commitment into practice: Evolution of the SUNY Binghamton-Johnson City Collaborative Education Project. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Programs Project Officer's meeting topical session on Integration Education: State of Implementation and Future Directions, Washington, DC.
30.
SalisburyC. L. (1991, May). Empirical evidence in support of inclusion. Presentation at the Maryland State Education Department Conference on Inclusive Education, Baltimore.
31.
SalisburyC. L.BrickerD. D. (1991). Preface-Special issue on implementation of PL 99-457, Part H. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(1), 3–4.
32.
SalisburyC. L.EvansI. M.PalombaroM. M.VeechG. (1990). Classroom ecology in an inclusive elementary school: Focus on instructional and social interactions. Paper presented at the national conference of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Chicago.
33.
SalisburyC. L.PenningtonJ.VeechG.PalombaroM. M. (1990). Teaming and teaching in an inclusive school: The perspectives of regular education. Paper presented at the national conference of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Chicago.
34.
SalisburyC. L.SyrycaS. (1990). Social and instructional interactions in kindergarten classrooms serving students with severe disabilities. Presentation at the International Division for Early Childhood conference, Albuquerque, NM.
35.
SalisburyC. L.VincentL. J. (1990). Criterion of the next environment and best practices: Mainstreaming and integration 10 years later. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 78–89.
36.
StainbackW.StainbackS.BunchG. (1989). A rationale for the merger of regular and special education. In StainbackS.StainbackW.ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 15–28). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
37.
StedmanL. C. (1987, November). It's time we changed the effective schools formula. Phi Delta Kappan, 215–224.
38.
StrainP. S. (1985). Social and nonsocial determinants of acceptability in handicapped preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 47–58.
39.
TaylorS.BiklenD.LehrS.SearleS. (1987). Purposeful integration … Inherently equal. Syracuse, NY: Center on Human Policy, Syracuse University.
40.
TemplemanT. P.FredericksH. D.UdellT. (1989). Integration of children with moderate and severe handicaps into a daycare center. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(4), 315–328.
41.
ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (1990). Strategies for educating learners with severe disabilities within their local home schools and communities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(3), 1–24.
42.
WillM. (1986). Educating students with learning problems—A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.
