This study explores how the method of delivery for early intervention services impacts perceptions of empowerment among families. Analysis of data collected from 270 randomly sampled families participating in the State of Michigan's Early On (Part H of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) program suggests two paths by which empowerment is effected. Along one path, implementation of program components via a family-centered framework appears to help increase empowerment. An alternative path models how family-centered delivery may help to build a family's support network. This is related to reduced stress and increased empowerment. Findings support programs emphasizing family-centered methods of service delivery.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalcazarF.SeekinsT.FawcettS.HopkinsB. (1990). Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 281–296.
2.
BenderP.WuE. (1995). EQS for Macintosh User's Guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3.
BergerP.NeuhausR. (1977). To empower the people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
4.
BristolM.GallagherJ.SchoplerE. (1988). Mothers and fathers of young developmentally disabled and nondisabled boys: Adaptation and social support. Developmental Psychology, 24, 441–451.
5.
ChavisD.WandersmanA. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.
6.
CookT.CampbellD. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7.
CongerJ.KanungoR. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–82.
8.
DeanD. (1961). Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. American Sociological Review, 26, 753–758.
9.
DunstC.TrivetteC.JenkinsV. (1988). Family support scale. In DunstC.TrivetteC.DealA. (Eds.), Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
10.
DunstC.TrivetteC.JohansonC. (1994). Parent-professional collaboration and partnerships. In DunstC.TrivetteC.DealA. (Eds.), Supporting and strengthening families: Vol. 1. Methods, strategies, and practices (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
11.
DunstC.TrivetteC.StarnesA.L.HambyD.GordonN. (1993). Building and evaluation of family support initiatives: A national study of programs for persons with developmental disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
12.
Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-457. Title 20, U.S.C. 1400 et seq. U.S. Statues at large, 105, 587–608. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 927).
13.
FinifterA. (1970). Dimensions of political alienation. The American Political Science Review, 64, 389–410.
14.
FlorinP.WandersmanA. (1990). An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–53.
15.
FreyK.GreenbergM.FewellR. (1989). Stress and coping among parents of handicapped children: A multidimensional approach. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 94, 240–249.
16.
GallagherJ.DesimoneL. (1995). Lessons learned from implementation of the IEP: Applications to the IFSP. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(3), 353–378.
17.
GutierrezL.OrtegaR. (1991). Developing methods to empower Latinos: The importance of groups. Social Work with Groups, 14, 23–43.
18.
HermanS.MarcenkoM.HazelK. (1996). Parents' perspectives on quality in family support programs. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 156–159.
19.
HolroydJ. (1974). The questionnaire on resources and stress: An instrument to measure family response to a handicapped family member. Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 92–94.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. 102-119. Title 20, U.S.C. 1400 et seq.: U.S. Statues at Large, 105, 587–608. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 885).
22.
KiefferC. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9–36.
23.
KorenP. E.DeChilloN.FriesenB. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305–321.
24.
LipskyMichael. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
MatonK. I.RappaportJ. (1984). Empowerment in a religious setting: A multivariate investigation. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 37–72.
26.
Meadow-OrlansK. (1994). Stress, support, and deafness: Perceptions of infants' mothers and fathers. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 91–102.
27.
ParsonsR. J. (1991). Empowerment: Purpose and practice principle in social work. Social Work with Groups, 14, 7–21.
28.
RappaportJ. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
29.
RappaportJ. (1986). Collaborating for empowerment: Creating the language of mutual help. In BoyteH.ReissmanF. (Eds.), The new populism: The politics of empowerment (pp 65–79). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
RigerS. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.
31.
SalisburyC. L. (1986). Adaptation of the questionnaire on resources and stress-short form. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 456–459.
32.
ShortP. M.RinehartJ. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of the level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 951–960.
33.
SimonB. L. (1994). The empowerment tradition in American social work: A history. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
SinghN.CurtisW.EllisC.NicholsonM.VillaniT.WechslerH. (1995). Psychometric analysis of the family empowerment scale. Journal of Behavioral and Emotional Disorders, 3, 85–91.
35.
SwanW.MorganJ. (1993). Collaborating for comprehensive services for young children and their families: The Local Interagency Coordinating Council. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
36.
TrivetteC.DunstC.BoydK.HambyD. (1996). Family-oriented program models, helpgiving practices, and parental control appraisals. Exceptional Children, 62, 237–248.
37.
U.S. Department of Commerce (1992). 1990 Census of Population: General population characteristics (Michigan). (Bureau of Census Publication 1990 CP-1-24). Washington, DC: Author.
38.
WarfieldM. (1995). The cost-effectiveness of home visiting versus group services in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 130–148.
39.
WintonP. (1993). Providing family support in integrated settings: Research and recommendations. In PeckC.OdomS.BrickerD. (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 65–80). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
40.
WolfendaleS. (1992). Empowering parents and teachers: Working for children. London: Cassell.
41.
ZimmermanM. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.
