In this study, a team of researchers conducted multiple observations in 12 third- and seventh-grade reading classrooms in both urban and suburban school districts over a 9-month period. These observations focused on whether talented readers received differentiated reading curriculum and/or instructional strategies. Talented readers were defined as students reading at least two grades above their chronological grade placement who also had advanced language skills and advanced processing capabilities in reading. Results indicated that talented readers received some differentiated reading instruction in 3 of the 12 classrooms. In the other nine classrooms, no challenging reading material or advanced instruction was provided for these students during regular classroom reading instruction. Appropriately challenging books were seldom made available for talented students in their classrooms, and they were rarely provided with more challenging work. Different patterns did emerge across districts. For example, the three classroom teachers who did provide some level of differentiation all taught in suburban schools.
References
1.
Allington, R. L. (2002). What I’ve learned about effective reading instruction from a decade of studying exemplary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 740-747.
2.
Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J. S., & Hagood, M. C. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association and Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
3.
Anderson, G., Higgins, D., & Wurster, S. (1985). Differences in free reading books selected by high, average, and low achievers. The Reading Teacher, 39, 326-330.
4.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education.
5.
Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (Research Monograph No. 93102). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
6.
Baskin, B. H., & Harris, K. H. (1980). Books for the gifted child. New York: R. R. Bowker.
7.
Bates, G. (1984). Developing reading strategies for the gifted: A research based approach. Journal of Reading, 27, 590-593.
8.
Baum, S. (1985). How to use picture books to challenge the gifted. Early Years, 15, 48-50.
9.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
10.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
11.
Bonds, C. W., & Bonds, T. T. (1983). Teacher, is there a gifted reader in first grade?Roeper Review, 5(3), 4-6.
12.
Brown, W., & Rogan, J. (1983). Reading and young gifted children. Roeper Review, 5(3), 6-9.
13.
Carter, B. (1982, Summer). Leisure reading habits of gifted students in a suburban high school. Top of the News, 38, 312-317.
14.
Catron, R. M., & Wingenbach, N. (1986). Developing the gifted reader. Theory Into Practice, 25, 134-140.
15.
Chall, J. S., & Conard, S. S. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder textbooks. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
18.
Collins, N. D., & Aiex, N. K. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English and Communication Digest #101.
19.
Collins, N. D., & Kortner, A. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication. Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed389637.html
20.
Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom. York, ME: Stenhouse.
21.
Davis, S. J., & Johns, J. (1989). Students as authors: Helping gifted students get published. Gifted Child Today, 12(6), 20-22.
22.
Dean, G. (1998). Challenging the more able language user. London: Fulton.
23.
Dole, J. A., & Adams, P. J. (1983). Reading curriculum for gifted readers: A survey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 64-72.
24.
Dooley, C. (1993). The challenge: Meeting the needs of gifted readers. Reading Teacher, 46, 546-551.
25.
Durkin, D. (1966). Children who read early. New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Durkin, D. (1990). Matching classroom instruction with reading abilities: An unmet need. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 23-28.
27.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Feldhusen, H. J. (1986). Individualized teaching of gifted children in regular classrooms. East Aurora, NY: D.O.K.
29.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Why the public schools will continue to neglect the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 12(2), 56-59.
30.
Gentry, M. L. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms (RM99138). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
31.
Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32.
Graves, D. H. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., Von Secker, C., & Alban, T. (2000). Contributions of instructional practices to reading achievement in a statewide improvement program. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 211-225.
34.
Guthrie J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Halsted, J. W. (1990). Guiding the gifted reader (ERIC EC Digest E481). Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://kidsource.com/kidsource/content/guiding_gifted_reader.html
36.
Halsted, J. W. (1994). Some of my best friends are books: Guiding gifted readers from pre-school to high school. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
37.
Hauser, P., & Nelson, G. A. (1988). Books for the gifted child. New York: R. R. Bowker.
38.
Jackson, N. E. (1988). Precocious reading ability: What does it mean?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 200-204.
39.
Jackson, N. E., & Roller, C. M. (1993). Reading with young children (Research Monograph 9302). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
40.
Kaplan, S. (1999). Reading strategies for gifted readers. Teaching for High Potential, 1(2), 1-2.
41.
Kaplan, S. (2001). An analysis of gifted education curriculum models. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 133-158). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
42.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178-206). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
43.
Leu, D. J. (2000). Our children’s future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 53, 424-429.
44.
Leu, D. J. (2001). Internet project: Preparing students for new literacies in a global village. Reading Teacher, 54, 568-572.
45.
Levande, D. (1993). Identifying and serving the gifted reader. Reading Improvement, 30, 147-150.
46.
Levande, D. (1999). Gifted readers and reading instruction. CAG Communicator, 30(1), 21-20, 41-42.
47.
Mangieri, J. N., & Madigan, F. (1984). Reading for gifted students: What schools are doing. Roeper Review, 7, 68-70.
48.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Mason, J. & Au, K. (1990). Reading instruction for today. New York: Harper Collins.
50.
McCormick, S., & Swassing, R. H. (1982). Reading instruction for the gifted: A survey of programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1, 34-43.
51.
McIntosh, M. E. (1982). An historical look at gifted education as it relates to reading programs for the gifted. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 244472)
52.
McPhail, J. C., Pierson, J. M., Freeman, J. G., Goodman, J., & Ayappa, A. (2000). The role of interest in fostering grade students’ identities as competent learners. Curriculum Inquiry, 30, 43-69.
53.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Passow, A. H. (1981). The nature of giftedness and talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 5-10.
56.
Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F. J., Richards, S., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Reading instruction for talented readers: Few opportunities for continuous progress (Research Monograph 03182). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
57.
Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
58.
Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Díaz, E. P., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (Research Monograph 95120). Storrs: The National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
59.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). Developing challenging programs for gifted readers. The Reading Instruction Journal, 32, 44-57.
60.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Using curriculum compacting to challenge the above-average. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 51-57.
61.
Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F., Hébert, T., Plucker, J., et al. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January?: The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
62.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
63.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness?Moravia, NY: Chronicle Guidance.
64.
Renzulli, J. S. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 298-309.
65.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
66.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1989). Providing challenging programs for gifted readers. Roeper Review, 12, 92-97.
67.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
68.
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., & Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. Elementary School Journal, 82, 185-194.
69.
Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (RBDMS9102). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
70.
Sandby-Thomas, M. (1983). The organization of reading and pupil attainment. Journal of Research in Reading, 6(1), 29-40.
71.
Savage, J. (1983). Reading guides: Effective tools for teaching the gifted. Roeper Review, 5, 9-11.
72.
Shrenker, C. E. (1997). Meeting the needs of gifted students within whole group reading Instruction. Ohio Reading Teacher, 31, 70-74.
73.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Karweit, N. L., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B. A. (1992). Success for All: A relentless approach to prevention and early intervention in elementary schools. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Search.
74.
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1999). Roots & wings: Effects of whole-school reform on student achievement. Baltimore: Author.
75.
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2000). Research on achievement outcomes of Success for All: A summary and response to critics. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 38-66.
76.
Southern, T. W., & Jones, E. D. (1992). The real problems with academic acceleration. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 34-38.
77.
Stanley, J. C. (1989). A look back at educational non-acceleration: An international tragedy. Gifted Child Today, 12(4), 60-61.
78.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
79.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81.
Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1988). Pretesting: Minimize time spent on skill work for intermediate readers. Reading Teacher, 42(2), 100-104.
82.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixedability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
83.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades (Report No. ED 443572). Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
84.
Treffinger, D. J., & Barton, B. L. (1988). Fostering independent learning. Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 28-30.
85.
Trezise, R. (1978). What about a program for the gifted?The Reading Teacher, 31, 742-747.
86.
Vacca, J. L., Vacca, R. T., & Gove, M. K. (1991). Reading and learning to read. New York: Harper Collins.
87.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1996). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 164-169.
88.
Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analysis and review of research on pullout programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 95-98.
89.
West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2000). America’s kindergarteners: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998-99, Fall 1998 (Report NCES2000-070). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
90.
Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. (Research Monograph 93104). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
91.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
