An Instrument for the Measure of Dabrowskian Overexcitabilities to Identify Gifted Elementary Students

Abstract

The ElemenOE is a Likert-scaled observation checklist developed in this study to measure 5 personality characteristics in elementary school children, with predictive validity for identifying giftedness. The characteristics, named “overexcitabilities,” are described within the context of Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration. Five scholars of Dabrowski’s theory rated an initial 100 items for content validity. The 61 strongest items comprised the pilot instrument, which teachers used to describe 373 students. Exploratory factor analysis using varimax rotation found factors that related to the 5 OEs. Items with loadings of less than .5 were eliminated, thus creating the 30-item ElemenOE. Teachers used the ElemenOE to describe 171 gifted and nonidentified children. A discriminant analysis yielded one function that significantly discriminated between groups. The ElemenOE classified 76% of gifted students and 42% of nonidentified students as having similar OE profiles. These results indicate that, with revisions, the ElemenOE may be useful in identifying gifted students who are missed by traditional identification measures.

References

Ackerman, C.M. (1997). A secondary analysis of research using the Overexcitability Questionnaire. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.

Breard, N. S. (1994). Exploring a different way to identify gifted African American students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.

Buerschen, T. (1995). Researching an alternative assessment in the identification of gifted and talented students. Unpublished manuscript, Miami University, Oxford, OH.

Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.

Lind Consulting, Kent, WA.

Gallagher, S. A. (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115-119.

Gallagher, J. J. , & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Guilford, J. P. (1979) Intellect and the gifted. In J. C. Gowan , J. Khatena, & E. P. Torrance (Eds.), Educating the ablest: A book of readings on the education of gifted children. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

10.

Lind, S. , & Daniels, S. (1998). Dabrowski in the classroom. Paper presented at the Dabrowski Symposium, Evanston, IL.

11.

Mendaglio, S. , & Pyryt, M. (1996). Self-concept and the gifted: A Dabrowskian perspective. In W. Tillier (Assembler), Proceedings. Perspectives on the self: The Second Biennial Conference on Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration (pp. 38-51). Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

12.

Nelson, K. C. (1989). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. Advanced Development Journal, 1, 1-14.

13.

Piechowski, M. M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 366-381). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

14.

Piechowski, M. M. , & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88.

15.

Piechowski, M. M. , & Cunningham, K. (1985) Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 153-174.

16.

Piechowski, M. M. , & Miller, N. B. (1995). Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Review, 17, 176-180.

17.

Silverman, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Counseling the gifted & talented. Denver: Love.

18.

Sisk, D. A. (1998). The importance of early identification of gifted children and appropriate educational intervention. In J. F. Smutny (Ed.), The young gifted child: Potential and promise: An anthology (pp. 73-89). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

19.

Tillier, B. (1998). The basic concepts of Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. The Dabrowski Newsletter, 5, 1-5.

20.

Torrance, E. P. (1965). Gifted children in the classroom. New York: Macmillan.

21.

Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.

22.

Tuttle, F. B. , Becker, L. A. , & Sousa, J. A. (1988). Characteristics and identification of gifted and talented students (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

23.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 126-135). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

24.

Webb, J. T. , Meckstroth, E. A. , & Tolan, S. S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child: A practical source for parents and teachers. Columbus: Ohio Psychology Press.