The use of evaluation in inseivice training and staff development programs is too often limited in scope. This article expands the role of evaluation in gifted program inservice and staff development by providing evaluation techniques that have been used to determine the impact of inservice programs on teachers of the gifted.
References
1.
Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. ( 1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
2.
Denzin, N.K. (1970). The Research Act. Chicago, IL: Adline Publishing Company.
3.
Henerson, M.E., Morris, L.L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1978). How to Measure Attitudes . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
4.
Kahn, R.L. and Cannel, C.F. (1972). The Dynamics of Interviewing: Theory, Technique, and Cases. New York, NY: John Wiley .
5.
Martinson, R.A. (1976). A guide toward better teaching for the gifted . Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
6.
Morris, L.L. & Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1978). How to measure attitudes . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
7.
Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., & Wright, S.R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
