Objective: The study evaluated the effectiveness of an online first aid course by comparing it with the traditional instructor-led course. An effective online course increases course accessibility and mitigates the major deterrent to widespread layperson training.
Design: A comparison group design evaluated performances among 25 laypersons self-selecting the traditional course and 46 self-selecting the online course.
Setting: Online participants completed the course in a location and at a time convenient to them. Traditional participants completed the course at testing sites. All attended a testing site for skills testing.
Method: Eight instructors participated in traditional course delivery, skills review and practice, and skills testing. They assessed participants’ performance using standard checklists. Resuscitation mannequins captured objective performance data.
Results: Instructors assessed all participants as passing all skills tests. None passed using the objective data but online course participants outperformed traditional course participants.
Conclusions: The online course is effective. Its accessibility permits broader dissemination and use.
American Heart Association (AHA). Part 14: First aid. Circulation Supplement, 2005: 112(24): 196–203.
2.
FlintLSBilliJEKellyKMandelLNewellLStapletonER. Education in adult basic life support training programs. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1993: 22(2): 202/468–208/474.
3.
PottsJLynchB. The American Heart Association CPR Anytime Program: The potential impact of highly accessible training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 2006: 26: 346–354.
4.
KayeWManciniME. Teaching adult resuscitation in the United States – time for a rethink. Resuscitation, 1998: 37: 177–187.
5.
ManciniMEKayeW. Resuscitation training: A time for reassessment. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 1996: 10(4): 71–84.
6.
DonnellyPAssarDLesterC. A comparison of manikin CPR performance by lay persons trained in three variations of basic life support guidelines. Resuscitation, 2000: 45: 195–199.
7.
HazinskiMFNadkarniVMHickeyRWO’ConnorRBeckerLBZaritskyA. Major changes in the 2005 AHA guidelines for CPR and ECC: Reaching the tipping point for change (Editorial). Circulation, 2005: 112: 206–211.
8.
BatchellerAMBrennanRTBraslowAUrrutiaAKayeW. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of subjects over forty is better following half-hour video self-instruction compared to traditional four-hour classroom training. Resuscitation, 2000: 43: 101–110.
9.
BraslowABrennanRTNewmanMMBircherNGBatchellerAMKayW. CPR training without an instructor: Development and evaluation of a video self-instructional system for effective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation, 1997: 34(3): 207–220.
10.
EinspruchELLynchBAufderheideTPNicholGBeckerL. Retention of CPR skills learned in a traditional AHA Heartsaver course versus 30-min video self-training: A controlled randomized study. Resuscitation, 2007: 74: 476–486.
11.
LynchBEinspruchELNicholGBeckerLBAufderheideTPIdrisA. Effectiveness of a 30-min CPR self-instruction program for lay responders: A controlled randomized study. Resuscitation, 2005: 67(1): 31–43.
12.
RoppoloLPPepePECampbellLOhmanKKulkarniHMillerR. Prospective, randomized trial of the effectiveness and retention of 30-min layperson training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators: The American Airlines Study. Resuscitation, 2007: 74: 276–285.
13.
ToddKHHeronSLThompsonMDennisRO’ConnorJKellermannAL. Simple CPR: A randomized, controlled trial of video self-instructional cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in an African American church congregation. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1999: 34(6): 730–737.
14.
AbellaBSAufderheideTPEigelBHickeyRWLongstrethWTNadkarniV. Reducing barriers for implementation of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association regarding the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation, 2008: 117. Online. Available: from http://circ.ahajournals.org (21 January 2008).
Redorbit News. American Heart Association enhances elearning for emergency cardiovascular care (ECC). 14 September 2007. Online. Available: http://www.redorbit.com/news/display/?id=1066394 (23 June 2008).
18.
BirnbaumAMcBurnieMAPowellJVan OttinghamLRiegelBPottsJ. Modeling instructor preferences for CPR and AED competence estimation. Resuscitation, 2005: 64: 333–339.
19.
BrennanRTBraslowA. Skill mastery in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training classes. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1995: 13(5): 505–508.
20.
IsbyeDLRasmussenLSLippertFKRudolphSFRingstedCV. Laypersons may learn basic life support in 24 min using a personal resuscitation manikin. Resuscitation, 2006: 69(3): 435–442.
21.
LynchBEinspruchELNicholGAufderheideTP. Assessment of BLS skills: Optimizing use of instructor and manikin measures. Resuscitation, 2008: 76(2): 233–243.
22.
AssarDChamberlainDColquhounMConnellyPHandleyAJLeavesS. Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support, 1: Skill acquisition at bronze stage. Resuscitation, 2000: 45: 7–15.
23.
HigdonTAHeidenreichJWKernKBSandersABBergRAHilwigRWClarkLLEwyGA. Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations. Resuscitation, 2006: 71: 34–39.
24.
SayreMRBergRACaveDMPageRLPottsJWhiteRD. Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-or-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. Circulation, 2008: 117: DOI:10.1161/CirculationAHA.107.18938010.1161/CirculationAHA.107.189380.
25.
HazinskiMFChameidesLEllingBHemphillR (eds). Highlights of the 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Currents in Emergency Cardiovascular Care, 2005–2006: 16(4): 1–27.
26.
NicholGStiellIGLaupacisAPhamBDe MaioVJWellsGA. A cumulative meta-analysis of the effectiveness of defibrillator-capable emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1999: 34(4)(Part 1): 517–525.
27.
StiellINicholGWellsGDe MaioVNesbittLBlackburnJ. Health-related quality of life is better for cardiac arrest survivors who received citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation, 2003: 108: 1939–1944.
28.
SworRKhanIDomeierRHoneycuttLChuKComptonS. CPR training and CPR performance: Do CPR-trained bystanders perform CPR?Academic Emergency Medicine, 2006: 13(6): 596–601.
29.
SOS-Kanto Study Group. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): An observational study. Lancet, 2007: 369: 920–926.
