Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the interrelationship between driver distraction and characteristics of driver behavior associated with reduced highway traffic efficiency. Background: Research on the three-phase traffic theory and on behavioral driving suggests that a number of characteristics associated with efficient traffic flow may be affected by driver distraction. Previous studies have been limited, however, by the fact that researchers typically do not allow participants to change lanes, nor do they account for the impact of varying traffic states on driving performance. Methods: Participants drove in three simulated environments with differing traffic congestion while both using and not using a cell phone. Instructed only to obey the speed limit, participants were allowed to vary driving behaviors, such as those involving forward following distance, speed, and lane-changing frequency. Results: Both driver distraction and traffic congestion were found to significantly affect lane change frequency, mean speed, and the likelihood of remaining behind a slower-moving lead vehicle. Conclusions: This research suggests that the behavioral profile of “cell phone drivers,” which is often described as compensatory, may have far-reaching and unexpected consequences for traffic efficiency. Application: By considering the dynamic interplay between characteristics of traffic flow and driver behavior, this research may inform both public policy regarding in-vehicle cell phone use and future investigations of driving behavior.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27, 707-715.
2.
Beede, K.E. & Kass, S.J. (2006). Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38, 415-421.
3.
Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., & Wu, J. (1998). Lane changing on the motorway: Factors affecting its occurrence, and their implications. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control (pp. 160-164). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers .
4.
Burns, P.C., Parkes, A., Burton, S., Smith, R.K., & Burch, D. (2002). How dangerous is driving with a mobile phone? Benchmarking the impairment to alcohol (TRL Report 547). Berkshire, UK: Transportation Research Laboratory.
5.
Chowdhury, D., Wolf, D.E., & Schreckenberg, M. (1997). Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: Effects of lane-changing rules. Physica A, 235, 417-439.
6.
Davis, L.C. (2004). Multilane simulations of traffic phases. Physical Review E, 69, 026124.1-026124.5.
7.
Glassbrenner, D. (2005). Driver cell phone use in 2005: Overall results. Traffic safety facts research note (Report No. DOT-HS-809-967). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration .
8.
Green, P., Hoekstra, E., & Williams, M. (1993). Further on-the-road tests of driver interfaces: Examination of a route guidance system and car phone (Report No. UMTRI-93-35) . Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute .
9.
Greenberg, J., Tijerina, L., Curry, R., Artz, B., Cathey, L., Kochhar, D., et al. (2003). Evaluation of driver distraction using an event detection paradigm. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1843, 1-9.
10.
Haigney, D.E., Taylor, R.G., & Westerman, S.J. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: Task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Research Part F, 3, 113-121.
11.
Horrey, W.J., & Wickens, C.D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196-205.
12.
Huang, D. (2002). Lane-changing behavior on highways. Physics Review E, 66, 026124.1-026124.5.
13.
Jeffcoate, G.O., Skelton, N., & Smeed, R.J. (1970). Analyses of national accident statistics of overtaking road accidents. London: University College, Traffic Studies Group.
14.
Kerner, B. (2004). The physics of traffic: Empirical freeway pattern features, engineering applications, and theory. Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
15.
Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., & Schreckenberg, M. (1999). Disorder effects in cellular automata for two-lane traffic. Physica A, 265, 614-633.
16.
Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., & Schreckenberg, M. (2002). Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: Microscopic description of traffic phases. Physical Review E, 65, 056133.1-056133.16.
Nagel, K., & Paczuski, M. (1995). Emergent traffic jams. Physical Review E, 51, 2909-2918.
19.
Pande, A., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2006). Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38, 936-948.
20.
Recarte, M.A., & Nunes, L.M. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31-43.
21.
Reed, M.P., & Green, P.A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42, 1015-1037.
22.
Rosenbloom, T. (2006). Driving performance while using cell phones: An observational study. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 207-212.
23.
Sparman, U. (1979, June). The importance of lane changing on motorways . Traffic Engineering and Control, pp. 320-323.
24.
Strayer, D.L., Cooper, J.M., & Drews, F.A. (2004). What do drivers fail to see when conversing on a cell phone? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 2213-2217). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
25.
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors , 46, 640-649.
26.
Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., & Crouch, D.J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48, 381-391.
27.
Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., & Johnston, W.A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-23.
28.
Strayer, D.L., & Johnston, W.A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone . Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
29.
Törnros, J., & Bolling, A. (2006). Mobile phone use: Effects of conversation on mental workload and driving speed in rural and urban environments. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 9, 298-306.
30.
Treiber, M., Kesting, A., & Helbing. D. (2006a). Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Physica A, 360, 71-88.
31.
Treiber, M., Kesting, A., & Helbing, D. (2006b). Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. Physics Review E, 74, 016123.1-016123.10.
