Research on diversity in teams and organizations has revealed ambiguous results regarding the effects of group composition on workgroup performance. The categorization—elaboration model (van Knippenberg et al., 2004) accounts for this variety and proposes two different underlying processes. On the one hand diversity may bring about intergroup bias which leads to less group identification, which in turn is followed by more conflict and decreased workgroup performance. On the other hand, the information processing approach proposes positive effects of diversity because of a more elaborate processing of information brought about by a wider pool and variety of perspectives in more diverse groups. We propose that the former process is contingent on individual team members' beliefs that diversity is good or bad for achieving the team's aims. We predict that the relationship between subjective diversity and identification is more positive in ethnically diverse project teams when group members hold beliefs that are pro-diversity. Results of two longitudinal studies involving postgraduate students working in project teams confirm this hypothesis. Analyses further reveal that group identification is positively related to students' desire to stay in their groups and to their information elaboration. Finally, we found evidence for the expected moderated mediation model with indirect effects of subjective diversity on elaboration and the desire to stay, mediated through group identification, moderated by diversity beliefs.
Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G.Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: SAGE, 1991.
2.
Allred, B.B. , Snow, C.C. & Miles, R.E.Characteristics of managerial careers in the 21st century . Academy of Management Executive, 1996, 10, 17-27.
3.
Blau, P.M.Inequality and heterogenity. New York: Free Press, 1977.
4.
Bliese, P.D. & Hanges, P.J.Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though it is independent . Organizational Research Methods, 2004, 7, 400-17.
5.
Brodbeck, F.C. , Guillaume, Y.R.F. & Lee, N.Diversity as a multilevel construct: Predicting cross-level interaction effects on group member learning. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2007.
6.
Calder, B.J. , Phillips, L.W. & Tybout, A.M.The concept of external validity . The Journal of Consumer Research, 1982, 9, 240-4.
7.
Chattopadhyay, P. , George, E. & Lawrence, S.A.Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89, 892-900.
8.
Chen, G. , Bliese, P.D. & Mathieu, J.E.Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology . Organizational Research Methods , 2005, 8, 375-409.
9.
Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T.Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
10.
Cox, T.Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1994.
11.
Cox, T. , Lobel, S. & McLeod, P.Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task . Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 827-47.
12.
Doosje, B. , Ellemers, N. & Spears, R.Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31, 410-36.
13.
Edwards, J.R. & Lambert, L.S.Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis . Psychological Methods, 2007, 12, 1-22.
14.
Edwards, M.R.Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review . International Journal of Management Reviews, 2005, 7, 207-30.
15.
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J.An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
Ely, R.J. & Thomas, D.A.Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on workgroup processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46, 229-73.
18.
Evans, M.G.A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36, 305-23.
19.
Gaertner, S.L. & Dovidio, J.F.Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 2000.
20.
Gersick, C.J.G.Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development . Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 9-41.
21.
Gersick, C.J.G.Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups . Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 274-309.
22.
Gordon, J.Work teams: How far have they come?Training, 1992, 29, 59-62.
23.
Harrison, D.A. & Klein, K.J.What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations . Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32, 1199-228.
24.
Harrison, D.A. , Price, K.H. & Bell, M.P.Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion . Academy of Management Journal , 1998, 41, 96-107.
25.
Harrison, D.A. , Price, K.H. , Gavin, J.H. & Florey, A.T.Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of diversity on group functioning . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45, 129-45.
26.
Haslam, A.S.Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach, 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 2004.
27.
Homan, A.C. , Hollenbeck, J.R. , Humphrey, S.E. , van Knippenberg, D. , Van Kleef, G.A. & Ilgen, D.R.Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups . Academy of Management Journal, in press.
28.
Homan, A.C. , van Knippenberg, D. , van Kleef, G.A. & De Dreu, C.K.W.Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2007a, 11, 79-94.
29.
Homan, A.C. , van Knippenberg, D. , van Kleef, G.A. & De Dreu, C.K.W.Bridging fault-lines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007b, 92, 1189-99.
30.
Kooij-De Bode, H.J.M. , van Knippenberg, D. & van Ginkel, W.P.Ethnic diversity and distributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, in press.
31.
Lawrence, B.S.The black box of organizational demography . Organization Science , 1997, 8, 1-22.
32.
MacKinnon, D.P. , Lockwood, C.M. & Williams, J.Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods . Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004, 39, 99-128.
33.
McClelland, G.H. & Judd, C.M.Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects . Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114, 376-90.
34.
Milliken, F.J. & Martins, L.L.Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups . Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21, 402-33.
35.
Paulus, P.B. , Nakui, T. , Parthasarathy, N. & Baruah, J.Preference for diverse workgroups and its relationship to perceptions and performance in diverse groups . Paper presented at the 19th SIOP Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2004.
36.
Pelled, L.H.Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory . Organization Science, 1996, 7, 615-31.
37.
Pratt, M.G.To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D.A. Whetten & P.C. Godfrey (Eds), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998, pp. 171-207.
38.
Riketta, M. & Van Dick, R.Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analysis comparison of the strength and correlates of work-group versus organizational commitment and identification . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2005, 67, 490-510.
39.
Sawyerr, O.O. , Strauss, J. & Yan, J.Individual value structure and diversity attitudes: The moderating effects of age, gender, race, and religiosity . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2005, 20, 498-521.
40.
Shrout, P.E. & Bolger, N.Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations . Psychological Methods, 2002 , 7, 422-45.
41.
Taggar, S.Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45, 315-30.
42.
Turner, J.C. , Hogg, M.A. , Oakes, P.J. , Reicher, S.D. & Wetherell, M.S.Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
43.
Van Dick, R.Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology . International Journal of Management Reviews, 2001, 3, 265-83.
44.
Van der Zee, K.I. , Atsma, N. & Brodbeck, F.C.The influence of social identity and personality on outcomes of cultural diversity in teams . Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 2004, 35, 283-303.
45.
Van Ginkel, W. & van Knippenberg, D.Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008, 105, 82-97.
46.
Van Knippenberg, D. & Haslam, A.S.Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In S.A. Haslam , D. van Knippenberg , M.J. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. New York: Psychology Press, 2003, pp. 61-77.
47.
Van Knippenberg, D. & Schippers, M.C.Work group diversity . Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58, 515-41.
48.
Van Knippenberg, D. , De Dreu, C.K.W. & Homan, A.C.Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004 , 89, 1008-22.
49.
Van Knippenberg, D. , Haslam, S.A. & Platow, M.J.Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs as moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and group identification . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2007, 11, 207-22.
50.
Wageman, R.Interdependence and group effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40, 140-80.
51.
Williams, K.Y. & O'Reilly, C.A.Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research . Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 20, 77-140.
