Because feedback information from students has been found to improve teachers' classroom performance, factor analysis was used to report students' perceptions in a concise, meaningful manner to instructors. The emerging four factor structure over 2 years of data from 2084 students was found to be very stable, and relatively uninfluenced by class size or course level. The first two factors appeared similar to the two traditional dimensions of leader behavior, initiating structure and consideration, and it is conjectured that existing leadership theory might be applicable in the university classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness.
References
1.
ALEAMONI, L. M.Development and factorial validation of the Arizona course/instructor evaluation questionnaire . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978, 38, 1063-1067 .
2.
ALFONSO, R. J. , FIRTH, G. R. , & NEVILLE, R. G.Instructional supervision: A behavior System. Boston: Allyn & Bacon , 1975.
3.
ANDERSON, C.A second look at Lady Godiva . Education Canada, 1972, 12(4), 17-22 .
4.
BAIRD, L. L.Teaching styles: An exploratory study of dimensions and effects . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 64, 15-21 .
5.
BENNIS, N. , & NANUS, B.Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row , 1985.
6.
BOLES, H. W. , & DAVENPORT, J. A.Introduction to educational leadership. New York: Harper & Row , 1975.
7.
BRAUNSTEIN, D. N. , KLEIN, G. A. , & PACHLA, M.Feedback expectancy and shifts in student ratings of college faculty . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 254-258 .
8.
CENTRA, J. A.Strategies for improving college teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education , 1972. (a)
9.
CENTRA, J. A.The student instructional report: Its development and uses: S.LR. report #1. Princeton, N.J.: ETS College and University Programs , 1972. (b)
10.
CENTRA, J. A.The student instructional report: S.LR. report #3. Princeton, N.J.: ETS College and University Programs , 1973.
11.
CENTRA, J. A.Determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1981.
12.
COFFMAN, W. E.Determining students' concepts of effective teaching from their ratings of instructors . Journal of Educational Psychology. 1954, 45, 277-286 .
13.
CONGER, G. R.What's a good teacher?Community and Junior College Journal, 1983, 54, 22-25 .
14.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L. , WISE, A. E. , & PEASE, S. R.Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature . Review of Educational Research, 1983, 83, 285-328 .
15.
DAWSON, J. E.Consideration and ICS: Instructor leadership influencing student performance. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Human Learning Institute , 1970.
16.
DAWSON, J. R. , MESSE, L. A. , & PHILLIPS, J. L.Effects of instructor-leader behavior on student performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 369-376 .
17.
DZIUBAN, C. D. , & SHIRKEY, E. C.When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules . Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 358-361 .
18.
FELDMAN, K.The superior college teacher from the student's view . Research in Higher Education, 1976, 5, 243-288 .
19.
FLANDERS, N. A.Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley , 1970.
20.
FLEISHMAN, E. A.The description of supervising behavior . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37, 1-6 .
21.
FLEISHMAN, E. A. , & HARRIS, E. P.Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover . Personnel Psychology, 1962, 15, 43-56 .
22.
FREY, P. W. , LEONARD, D. W. , & BEATTY, W. W.Student ratings of instructors: validation research . American Educational Research Journal, 1975, 12, 435-447 .
23.
GIBB, C. A.Classroom behavior of the college teacher . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1955, 15, 254-263 .
24.
GREENFIELD, T. B. , & ANDREWS, J. H. M.Teacher leader behavior . Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1961, 7, 92-102 .
25.
HARMAN, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1970.
26.
HOUSE, R. J. , FILLEY, A. C. , & KERR, S.Relation of leader consideration and initiating structure to R&D subordinates satisfaction . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 19-30 .
27.
HOWEY, K. R.Why teacher leadership?Journal of Teacher Education, 1988, 39(1), 28-31 .
28.
KAISER, H. F. , & RICE, J.Little Jiffy Mark IV . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974, 34, 111-117 .
29.
LAHAT-MANDLEBAUM, B. S. , & KIPNIS, D.Leader behavior dimensions related to students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 250-253 .
30.
LEVINE, M. F. , & WRIGHT, P. L.Testing transferability of a self-developed teaching effectiveness measure across colleges of business . Journal of Higher Education, 1987, 58, 85-100 .
31.
McKEACHIE, W. J. , LIN, Y. G. , & MANN, W.Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies . American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 435-445 .
32.
ROGUS, J. F.Teacher-leader programming: Theoretical underpinnings . Journal of Teacher Education, 1988, 39(1), 46-52 .
33.
RUMMEL, R. J.Applied factor analysis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press , 1970.
34.
RYANS, D. G.Characteristics of teachers. New York: American Council of Education , 1960.
35.
SOLOMON, D.Teacher behavior dimensions, course characteristics and student evaluations of teachers . American Educational Journal, 1966, 3, 36-47 .
36.
STOGDILL, R. M.Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press , 1974.
37.
ST. JOHN, N.Thirty-six teachers: Their characteristics and outcomes for black and white pupils . American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 635-648 .
38.
TOLOR, A.Evaluation of perceived teacher effectiveness . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 64, 98-104 .
39.
WRIGHT, P. , WHITTINGTON, R. , & WHITTENBERG, G. F.Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: What the research reveals . Journal of Accounting Education, 1984, 2, 5-30 .
