The paper argues against attempts to create a single framework for understanding organizational learning. Relevant literature is reviewed from six disciplinary perspectives: psychology and OD; management science; sociology and organizational theory; strategy; production management; and cultural anthropology. It is argued that each discipline provides distinct contributions and conceptions of problems. Furthermore, a basic distinction between organizational learning and the new idea of the learning organization is noted. Whereas the former is discipline based and analytic, the latter is multidisciplinary and emphasizes action and the creation of an "ideal-type" of organization. Due to the diversity of purpose and perspective, it is suggested that it is better to consider organizational learning as a multidisciplinary field containing complementary contributions and research agendas.
ABOLAFIA, M. Y., & KILDUFF, M.Enacting market crisis: The social construction of a speculative bubble. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1988, 33 (June), 177-193.
2.
ADLER, P S.Time-and-motion regained. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1993, 97-108.
3.
ADLER, P S., & COLE, R. E.Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Review, 1993 (Spring), 85-94.
4.
ALVESSON, M.Cultural-ideological modes of management control: A theory and a case study of a professional service company. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 3-42.
5.
ALVESSON, M., & WILMOTI H.Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: Sage, 1996.
6.
ANDREU, R., & CIBORRA, C.Core capabilities and information technology: An organizational learning approach. In B. Moingeon and A. Edmondson (Eds.), Organizational learning and competitive advantage. London: Sage, 1996.
7.
ARGOTE, L., BECKMAN, S. L., & EPPLE, D.The persistance and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 1990, 36(2), 140-154.
8.
ARGYRIS, C.Reinforcing organizational defensive routines: An unintended human resources activity. Human Resource Management, 1986, 25(4), 541-555.
9.
ARGYRIS, C.Why individuals and organisations have difficulty in double-loop learning. In C. Argyris (Ed.), On organizational learning. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
10.
ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON, D. A.Organizational learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
11.
BARTH, FThe analysis of culture in complex societies. Ethnos, 1989, 54, 120-142.
12.
BATESON, G.The logical categories of learning and communication. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry and epistemology. London: Paladin, 1973.
13.
BERGGREN, C.Nummi vs. Uddevalla. Sloan Management Review, 1993 (Winter), 37-45.
14.
BROWN, J. S., & DUGUID, POrganizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1), 40-57.
15.
BURGOYNE, J. G., PEDLER, M., & BOYDELL TTowards the learning company. London: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
16.
BUZZELL, R. D., & GALE, B. TThe PIMS principles. New York: The Free Press, 1987.
17.
CAMUS, B. E. Lapprentissage Organisationnel Appliqu6 aux Reseaux Commerciaux. MA dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, 1994.
CHILD, J.Review of C. Argyris "On organisational learning."Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31(3), 448-451
20.
CIBORRA, C. U., PATRIOTTA, G., & ERLICHER, L.Disassembling frames on the assembly line: The theory and practice of the new division of learning in advanced manufacturing. In W J. Orlikowsky, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work. Chapman-Hall, 1995.
21.
COOPEY, J.Power, politics and ideology. In J. Burgoyne, M. Pedler, & T Boydell (Eds.), Towards the learning company: Concepts and practices. London: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
GARVIN, D. A.Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, July-August 1993, 78-84.
35.
GIDDENS, A.Central problems in social theory. Macmillan: London, 1979.
36.
HAMEL, G., & PRAHALAD, C. K.Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1993, 75-84.
37.
HANNAN, M. T, & FREEMAN, J.Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
38.
HARLOW, H. E.The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 1949, 56, 51-65.
39.
HAWKINS, POrganizational learning: Taking stock and facing the challenge. Management Learning, 1994, 25(1), 71-82.
40.
HEDBERG, B.How organizations learn and unlearn. In P C. Nystrom and W H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design. London: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
41.
HEDLUND, G., & NONAKA, I.Models of knowledge management in the West and Japan. In P Lorange (Ed.), Implementing strategic processes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, pp. 117-144.
42.
HOFSTEDE, G.Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage, 1984.
43.
HONEY, P, & MUMFORD, A.The manual of learning styles. Peter Honey, 1982.
44.
HUBER, G.Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organizational Science, 1991, 2(1), 88-115.
45.
INKPEN, A. C., & CROSSAN, M. M.Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 1995, 32(5), 595-618.
46.
ISAACS, W N.Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 1993, 22(2), 24-39.
47.
JONES, A. M., & HENDRY, C.The learning organization: Adult learning and organizational transformation. British Journal of Management, 1994, 5(2), 153-162.
48.
KANTER, R. M.The new managerial work. Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. 1989, 85-92.
49.
KIM, D. H.The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, Fall 1993, 37-50.
50.
KOENIG, G.Lapprentissage organisationnel: Reperage des lieux. Revue Franqaise de Gestion, Jan-Fdv. 1994, 76-83.
51.
KOFMAN, F, & SENGE, PCommunities of commitment: The heart of the learning organization. Organization Dynamics, 1993, 22(3), 5-23.
52.
KOLB, D., RUBIN, I. M., & McINTYRE, J. M.Organizational psychology: A book of readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
53.
LATOUR, B., & WOOLGAR, S.Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.
LEITCH, C. M., HARRISON, R. T, & BURGOYNE, J. G.Understanding the Learning Company: A Constructivist Approach. Working paper, Ulster Business School and Lancaster University, 1995.
57.
LEVINTHAL, D. A., & MARCH, J. G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(Winter), 95-112.
58.
LILLRANK, PThe transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 1995, 16(6), 971-989.
59.
LYLES, M. A., & SALK, J. E.Learning from Foreign Parents in International Joint Ventures: An Empirical Examination in the Hungarial Context. Paper for Academy of Management Conference, Vancouver, August 1995.
60.
MARCH, J. G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1), 71-87.
61.
MARCH, J. G., & OLSEN, J. PThe uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. In J. G. March (Ed.), Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
62.
MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
63.
McGILL, M. E., SLOCUM, J. W, & LEI, D.Management practices in learning organizations. Organization Dynamics, 1992, 21(1), 5-17.
64.
MINER, A. S., & HAUNSCHILD, P R.Population level learning. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 1995, 17, 115-166.
65.
NANDA, A.Resources, capabilities and competencies. In B. Moingeon and A. Edmondson (Eds.), Organizational learning and competitive advantage. London: Sage, 1996.
66.
NEVIS, E. C., DiBELLA, A. J., & GOULD, J. M.Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 1995(Winter), 73-85.
67.
NICOLINI, D., & MEZNAR, M. B.The social construction of organizational learning: Concepts and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 1995, 48(7), 727-746.
68.
NICOLINI, D., GHERARDI, S., & ODELLA, FToward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations: The Notion Of Situated Curriculum. Paper presented at Symposium on Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization, Lancaster, September 1996.
NONAKA, I.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1), 14-37.
71.
NONAKA, I., & TAKEUCHI, H.The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
72.
OUCHI, WTheory Z.: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
73.
PARKE, A.Interfirm diversity, organizational learning and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991, 22(4), 579-601.
74.
PASCALE, R. T, & ATHOS, A. G.The art of Japanese management: Applications forAmerican executives. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981.
75.
PEDLER, M., BOYDELL, T, & BURGOYNE, J. G.Towards the learning company. Management Education and Development, 1989, 20(1), 1-8.
76.
PENNINGS, J. M., BARKEMA, H., & DOUMA, S.Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(3), 608-640.
77.
PETTIGREW, A. M.The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock, 1973.
78.
RAMIREZ, R. Making Organizational Learning Happen: A Review of Four Methods. Actes du seminaire internationale: pedagogies pour le changement, IAE Aix, 4-6 Mai, 1994.
79.
REVANS, R. W.Developing effective managers: A new approach to management education. London: Praeger Press, 1971.
80.
REVANS, R. WAction leaming: New Techniques for managers. London: Blond and Briggs, 1980.
81.
ROBEY, D., WISHART, N. A., & RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ, A. G.Merging the metaphors for organizational improvement: Business process engineering as a component of organizational learning. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 1995, 1, 23-39.
82.
RYDER, J.Learning Organization vs Organisation Apprenante. Working Paper 10/02, Groupe ESC Lyon, 1994.
83.
SCHEIN, E. H.On dialogue, culture and organizational learning. Organization Dynamics, 1993, 22(2), 40-51.
84.
SENGE, P M.The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business, 1990.
85.
SENGE, P M., & STERMAN, J. D.Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 59(1), 137-150.
86.
SENGE, P M.Learning to alter mental modes. Executive Excellence, 1994, 11(3), 16-17.
87.
SHIBATA, G., TSE, D., VERTINSKY, I., & WEHRUNG, D.Do norms of decision-making styles, organizational design and management affect performance of Japanese firms? An exploratory study of medium and large firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 1991, 12(2), 135-146.
88.
SHRIVASTAVA, PA typology of organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 1983, 20(1), 7-28.
89.
SPENDER, J.-C.Industry recipes: The nature and sources of managerial judgement. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
90.
SULLIVAN, J. J., & NONAKA, I.The application of organizational learning theory to Japanese and American management. Journal of International Business Studies, 1986, 17(3), 127-147.
TALBOT, C., & HARROW, J.Sharing or Withholding Knowledge? An Exploration of Changing Values in Managerial and Organizational Learning. Paper for British Academy of Management Conference, Milton Keynes, September 1993.
93.
THACKREY, J.The corporate culture rage. Management Today, February 1987, 66-69.
94.
TORBERT, W. R.Managerial learning, organzational learning: A potentially powerful redundancy. Management Learning, 1994, 25(1), 57-70.
