Book Review: American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation

BURT, R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

CANNELLA, A. , & PAETZOLD, R. Pfeffer's barriers to the advancement of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(2), 331-341.

DONALDSON, L. In defense of organizational theory: A reply to critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

DONALDSON, L. For positive organization theory: Proving the hard core. London: Sage, 1996.

DONALDSON, L. A positivist alternative to the structure-action approach. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1), 77-92.

HANNAN, M. T , & CARROLL, G. Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

HILMER, F , & DONALDSON, L. Management redeemed: Debunking the fads that undermine our corporations. New York: Free Press, 1996.

MEYER, A. D. , TSUI, A. S. , & HININGS, C. R. Guest co-editors' introduction: Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Joumal, 1993, 36(6), 1175-1195.

PERROW, C. Pfeffer slips. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(2), 191-194.

PFEFFER, J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(4), 599-620.

SCHULTZ, M. , & HATCH, M. J. Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2), 529-557.