The similarities and differences between two paradigms, Lean Production (LP) and Sociotechnical Systems (STS) thinking, which currently compete for the attention of managers and scholars interested in improving the design of work systems, are studied in this article. In order to find the logic behind each approach, the design principles formulated by Cherns have been used to evaluate LP from an STS viewpoint with respect to work design issues. The two concepts differ most with respect to their definition of system boundaries, the control mechanisms they favor and their value bases and assumptions about workers. The way control is exercised in each concept is closely related to the production structure and has far-reaching consequences for the human resource policies practiced. Although each approach has something to offer the other, the question whether the best ideas of both can be synthesized in designing a superior overall system cannot be answered so easily. In the end, it will require more than just choosing features of each approach to apply in combination; the differences in fundamental beliefs about people need to be reconciled in the design of the organization and its system.
ADLER, P. S., & COLE, R. E.Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Review, 1993, Spring,85-94.
2.
AOKI, M.Information, incentives, and bargaining in the Japanese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
3.
ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON, D. A.Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
4.
ARTHUR, J. B.Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(3), 670-687.
5.
BOWEN, J., QIU, Z., & LI, Y.Robust tolerance for ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, 57, 155-155.
6.
CHENG, T. C. E., & PODOLSKY, S.Just-in-time manufacturing. London: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
7.
CHERNS, A.Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 1987, 40, 153-162.
8.
CHRISTENSEN, T.A high-involvement redesign. Quality Progress, May 1993, 105-108.
9.
CONTI, R. F., & WARNER, M.Thylorism, new technology and just-in-time systems in Japanese manufacturing. New Technology, Work and Employment, 1993, 8, 31-42.
10.
CUMMINGS, T., & BLUMBERG, M.Advanced manufacturing technology and work design. In T D. Wall, C. W. Clegg, and N. J. Kemp (Eds.), The human side of advanced manufacturing technology. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
11.
DANKBAAR, B.Economic crisis and institutional change: The crisis of Fordism from the perspective of the automobile industry. Maastricht, The Netherlands: University Press Maastricht, 1993.
12.
DAUM, M., & PIEPEL, U. Lean production-Philosophie und realitat. io Management Zeitschrift, 1992, 61(1), 40-47.
13.
DELBRIDGE, R., TURNBULL, P., & WILKINSON, B.Pushing back the frontiers: Management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes. New Technology, Work and Employment, 1992, 7, 97-106.
14.
DOHSE, K., JURGENS, U., & MALSCH, T.From "Fordism" to "Toyotism?": The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry. Politics and Society, 1985, 14115-146.
15.
DUMAINE, B.Who needs a boss. Fortune, May 7, 1990, 52-59.
16.
EMERY, E. E., & TRIST, E. L.The causal texture of organizational environments. In W A. Pasmore and J. J. Sherwood (Eds.), Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. La Jolla, CA: University Associates, 1978.
17.
EMERY, F.Epilogue. In F M. van Eijnatten (Ed.), The paradigm that changed the work place. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1993.
18.
FORD, R. C., & FOTTLER, M. D.Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Executive, 1995, 3(9), 21-31.
19.
GARBER, J., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (Eds.). Human helplessness, theory and applications. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
20.
GULOWSEN, J.Organizational design in industry: Towards a democratic, socio-technical approach. Personnel Review, 1973, 2, 30-37.
21.
GUPTA, N., JENKINS, G., Jr., & CURINGTON, W.Paying for knowledge: Myths and realities. National Productivity Review, 1986, Spring, 107-123.
22.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
23.
HERBST, P. G.Autonomous group functioning. London: Tavistock, 1962.
24.
HERBST, P. G.Socio-technical design: Strategies in multidisciplinary research. London: Tavistock Publications, 1974.
25.
HOERR, J., POLLOCK, M. A., & WHITESIDE, D. E.Management discovers the human side of automation. Business Week, September 29, 1986, 60-65.
26.
HOFSTEDE, G.Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 1993, 7(3), 81-94.
27.
HOGG, T. M.Lean manufacturing. Human Systems Management, 1993, 12, 35-40.
28.
HUBER, V. L., & BROWN, K. A.Human resource issues in cellular manufacturing: A sociotechnical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 1991, 19, 138-159.
29.
HUTCHINS, D.Just in time. Aldershot: Gower Technical Press, 1990.
30.
KAMATA, S.Japan on the passing lane, An insider's account of life in a Japanese auto factory. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984.
31.
KLEIN, J. A.The human costs of manufacturing reform. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1989, 60-66.
32.
KRAFCIK, J. F.Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review, 1988, 30(1), 41-52.
33.
LEGGE, K.Human resource management: A critical analysis. In J. Storey (Ed.), New perspectives in human resource management. London: Routledge, 1991.
34.
LOWE, J.Manufacturing reform and the changing role of the production supervisor: The case of the automobile industry. Journal of Management Studies, 1993, 30(5), 739-758.
35.
MacDUFFIE, J. P.Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,, 199548(2), 197-221.
36.
MacDUFFIE, J. P., & KRAFCIK, J. F.Integrating technology and human resources for high performance manufacturing: Evidence from the international auto industry. In T A. Kochan and M. Useem (Eds.), Transforming organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
37.
MANZ, C. C., KEATING, D. E., & DONNELLON, A.Preparing for an organizational change to employee self-management: The managerial transition. Organizational Dynam- ics, 1990, Autumn, 15-26.
38.
MANZ, C. C.Self-leading work teams: Moving beyond self-management myths. Human Relations, 1992, 451119-1140.
39.
MILLER, R. W., & PRITCHARD, F. M.Factors associated with workers' inclination to participate in an employee involvement program. Group & Organization Management, 1992, 17, 414-430.
MOLLEMAN, E., & VAN KNIPPENBERG, A.Work redesign and the balance of control within a nursing context. Human Relations, 1995, 48, 795-814.
42.
MORGAN, G.Images of organizations. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986.
43.
ONDRACK, D. & TIMPERLEY, S. (Eds.). The humanisation of workToronto: University of Toronto, 1982.
44.
PARKER, M., & SLAUGHTER, J.Choosing sides, unions and the team concept. Boston: South End Press, 1992.
45.
PETERS, T.Thriving on chaos. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987.
46.
PIEPEL, U., & KRUPP, F Wege zur uebertragung der lean production. Management Zeitschnft, 1993, 62, 59-64.
47.
PRITCHARD, R. D.Measuring and improving organizational productivity: A practical guide. New York: Praeger, 1989.
48.
ROTTER, J. B.Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control in reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 801-28.
49.
SCHONBERGER, R.Japanese manufacturing techniques: Nine hidden lessons in simplicity. New York: Free Press, 1982.
50.
SHINGO, S.Zero quality control: Source inspection and the poka-yoke system. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press, 1986.
51.
SNELL, S. A.Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(2), 292-327.
52.
SNELL, S. A., & DEAN, J. W, Jr.Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(3), 467-504.
53.
SUGIMORI, Y., KUSUNOKI, K., CHO, F., & UCHIKAWA, S.Toyota production system and Kanban system: Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. International Journal of Production Research, 1977, 15, 553-564.
54.
SUSMAN, J. I.Autonomy at work: A socio-technical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger, 1976.
55.
TANNENBAUM, A. S., KAVCIC, B., ROSNER, B., VIANELLO, M., & WIESER, G.Hierarchy in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1974.
56.
TAYLOR, F W.Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Row, 1911.
57.
THOMPSON, J. D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
58.
TRIST E.The evolution of socio-technical systems: A conceptual framework and an action research program. Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Labor, 1981.
59.
TRIST E., & BAMFORTH, K. W.Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall Method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 6-24.
60.
TURNBULL, R. J.The limits to "Japanisation"just-in-time, labor relations and the UK automotive industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 1988, 3(1), 7-19.
61.
VAN EIJNATTEN, F. M.The paradigm that changed the work place. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1993.
62.
WEBER, M.The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.
63.
WILLIAMS, K., HASLAM, C., WILLIAMS, J., CUTLER, T., ADCROFT, A., & JOHAL, S.Against lean production. Economy and Society, 1992, 21(3), 321-354.
64.
WOMACK, J. P., JONES, D. T., & ROOS, D.The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates, 1990.
65.
WOOD, S.The Japanese management model: Tacit skills in shop floor participation. Work and Occupations, 1989, 16: 446-460.
