This study investigates the effect of the gender of grievants and the gender of arbitrators on the decisions in 1,812 discharge cases in the United States from 1976 through 1986. The results indicate that, other things equal, in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men. Women were also 32 percent more likely than men to receive a full reinstatement rather than a partial reinstatement from male arbitrators. There is little evidence of differential treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators, and no evidence that the preferential treatment of women by male arbitrators has declined over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BemmelsBrian1988a“The Effect of Grievants' Gender on Arbitrators' Decisions.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 41, No. 2 (January), pp. 251–62.
2.
BemmelsBrian1988b“Gender Effects in Discipline Arbitration: Evidence from British Columbia.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3 (September), in press.
3.
BigonessWilliam J., and DuBosePhilip B.1985“Effects of Gender on Arbitrators' Decisions.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2 (June), pp. 485–91.
4.
BlockRichard N., and StieberJack1987“The Impact of Attorneys and Arbitrators on Arbitration Awards.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July), pp. 543–55.
5.
DennisBarbara D.1976“The Publication of Arbitration Awards.” In DennisBarbara D. and SomersGerald B., eds., Arbitration-1975: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Arbitrators (Dorado Beach, Puerto Rico, April 28-May 3, 1975). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, pp. 208–15.
6.
HabermanShelby J.1978Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
7.
LabirChalmer E.Jr., and GreerCharles R.1988“Grievance Initiation: A Literature Survey and Suggestions for Future Research.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 1–27.
8.
MouldsElizabeth F.1980“Chivalry and Paternalism: Disparities of Treatment in the Criminal Justice System.” In DatesmanSusan K. and ScarpittiFrank R., eds., Women, Crime, and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–99.
9.
NagelIlene H., and HaganJohn1983“Gender and Crime: Offense Patterns and Criminal Court Sanctions.” In TonryMichael and MorrisNorval, eds., Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–144.
10.
NeedlemanRuth, and TannerLucretia Dewey1987“Women in Unions: Current Issues.” In KoziaraKaren ShallcrossMoskowMichael H., and TannerLucretia Dewey, eds., Working Women: Past, Present, Future. Industrial Relations Research Association Series. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, pp. 187–224.
11.
RodgersRobert C., and HelburnI. B.1985“The Arbitrariness of Arbitrators' Decisions.” Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting (Dallas, December 28–30, 1984). Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 234–41.
12.
SimonRita James1975Women and Crime. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.
13.
SteffensmeierDarrell J.1980“Assessing the Impact of the Women's Movement on Sex-Based Differences in the Handling of Adult Criminal Defendants.”Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 26 (July), pp. 344–57.
