It is believed that the New Public Management (NPM) doctrine resulted in a disaggregation and a suboptimal fragmentation of government in the 1980s and 1990s, which called for a re-strengthening of the coordination capacity through renewed hierarchy-type mechanisms, market-type mechanisms and network-type mechanisms. In order to assess the validity of this assumption, this article identifies the trajectory of specialization and coordination in four countries (New Zealand, United Kingdom, Sweden, France). The results support the assumption, although different trajectories are discernible. Also, the results point to the renewed emphasis on coordination based on hierarchy, along with markets and networks.
6, P. ( 2004) `Joined-up Government in the Western World in Comparative Perspective: A Preliminary Literature Review and Exploration', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14: 103—38.
2.
P. (2005) `Joined-up Government in the West Beyond Britain: A Provisional Assessment', in V. Bogdanor (ed.) Joined-up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
P., Leat, D. , Seltzer, K. and Stoker, G. (2002) Towards Holistic Goverance . The New Reform Agenda. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4.
Alexander, E.R. (1995) How Organisations Act Together: Interorganisational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: OSA.
5.
Bennet, C.J. (1991) `What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It? ', British Journal of Political Science21: 215—33.
6.
Blöndal, J.R. (2001) `Budgeting in Sweden', OECD Journal on Budgeting1(1): 27—57.
7.
Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (2005) Joined-up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Boston, J. (1992)`The Problems of Policy Coordination: The New Zealand Experience', Governance 5(1): 88—103.
9.
Boston, J. and Eichbaum, C. (2005) `State Sector Reform and Renewal in New Zealand: Lessons for Governance', paper prepared for Conference on `Repositioning of Public Governance — Global Experiences and Challenges', Taipei, November.
10.
Boston, J., Martin J., Pallot, J., and Walsh, P. (1996) Public Management, The New Zealand Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Bouckaert, G. (1997) `Overview and Synthesis', in OECD (ed.) `In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices in Ten OECD Countries'. pp. 1—17. Paris: Public Management Committee, OECD.
12.
Bouckaert, G., Verhoest, K. and Wauters, A. (2000) Van Effectiviteit van Coördinatie naar Coördinatie van Effectiviteit. Brugge: die Keure .
13.
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B.G. and Verhoest, K. (forthcoming) The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2006a) `The Whole-of-Government Approach: Regulation, Performance and Public Sector Reform', paper presented at `A Performing Public Sector: The Second Transatlantic Dialogue' Leuven, 1—3 June.
15.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., eds (2006b) Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., eds (2007) Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Aldershot:Ashgate.
17.
Dahlberg, L. (1993) `The Swedish Experience of Decentralized Government Through Agencies', paper presented at the `Public Sector Reforms' conference . Barcelona.
18.
Gauld, R. (2001) Revolving Doors: New Zealand's Health Reforms. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
19.
Gill, D. (2002) `New Zealand', in Oecd (ed.) Distributed Public Governance. Agencies, Authorities and other Government Bodies, pp. 133—60. Paris: OECD.
20.
Gregory, B. (2006) `Theoretical Faith and Practical Works: De-autonomizing and Joining-up in the New Zealand State Sector', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State , pp. 137—61. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
21.
Gregory, R. (2003) `Accountability in Modern Government', in G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration, pp. 557—68. London: Sage.
22.
Gulik, L. (1937) `Notes on the Theory of Organization', in L. Gulik and L. Urwick (eds) Papers on the Science of Administration . London: A.M. Kelley.
23.
Halligan, J. (2006) `The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, pp. 162—80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24.
Heffron, F. (1989) Organisation Theory and Public Organisations — The Political Connection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Hogwood, B.W. (1997) `The Machinery of Government 1979—97', Political Studies45: 704—15.
26.
Hood, C. (1991) `A Public Management for All Seasons?', Public Administration69(1): 3—19.
27.
Hood, C. (2005) `The Idea of Joined-up Government: A Historical Perspective', in V. Bogdanor (ed.) Joined-up Government, pp. 19—42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
James, O. (2004) `The UK Core Executive`s Use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of Governance', Public Administration82(2): 397—419.
29.
Kaufmann, F.X., Majone, G. and Ostrom, V., eds (1986) Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Berlin: de Gruyter.
30.
Klein, R. and Plowden, W. (2005) `JASP Meets JUG: Lessons of the 1975 Joint Approach to Social Policy for Joined-up Government', in V. Bogdanor (ed.) Joined-up Government, pp. 107—13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Lægreid, P., Rolland, V.W., Roness, P.G. and Ågotnes, J.-E. (2003) `The Structural Anatomy of the Norwegian State 1947—2003', paper presented at the seminar on Organizational Forms, Autonomy and Control in the Public Sector, Bergen, 1—2 December.
32.
Larsson, T. (2002) `Sweden', in Oecd (ed.) Distributed Public Governance. Agencies, Authorities and other Government Bodies, pp. 181—208. Paris: OECD.
33.
Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993) Quasi-markets and Social Policy. London: Macmillan.
34.
Ling, T. (2002) `Delivering Joined-up Government in the UK: Dimensions, Issues and Problems', Public Administration80(4): 615—42.
35.
Mintzberg, H.J. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
Molander, P., Nilsson, J.-E. and Schick, A. (2002) Does Anyone Govern? The Relationship Between the Government Office and the Agencies in Sweden. Stockholm: SNS.
37.
Moran, M. (2005) Politics and Governance in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
Mulgan, R. (1997) `Restructuring — The New Zealand Experience from an Australian Perspective', paper presented at the Public Policy Program, ANU.
39.
Niklasson, L. (2004) `Learning Networks for Regional Development: Evaluation as a Tool for Regional Governance', Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Sixth Conference, 30 September—2 October, Berlin.
40.
Oecd (1992) Public Management: Country Profiles. Paris: OECD.
41.
Oecd (1993) Managing with Market-type-mechanisms . Paris: OECD.
Oecd (2002) Distributed Public Governance: Agencies, Authorities and Other Government Bodies. Paris: OECD.
44.
O'Toole, L. (1997) `Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-based Agendas', Public Administration Review57(1): 45—52.
45.
Page, E. (2005) `Joined-up Government and the Civil Service', in V. Bogdanor (ed.) Joined-up Government , pp. 139—56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Pallot, J. (1991) `Financial Management Reform', in J. Boston, J. Martin, J. Pallot and P. Walsh (eds) Reshaping the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Peele, G. (1995) Governing the UK, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
Peters, B.G. (1998) `Managing Horizontal Government: the Politics of Co-ordination', Research Paper No. 21, Canadian Centre for Management Development.
49.
Peters, G.B. (2003) `The Capacity to Coordinate', paper presented at the workshop on Policy Capacity, Hong Kong.
50.
Pollitt, C. (2003) `Joined-up Government: A Survey', Political Studies Review1: 34—49.
51.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Pollitt, C. and Talbot, C., eds (2004) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Routledge.
53.
Richards, D. and Smith, M. (2006) `The Tensions of Political Control and Administrative Autonomy: From NPM to a Reconstituted Westminster Model', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds) `Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, pp. 181—202. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54.
Rugge, F. (2003) `Administrative Traditions in Western Europe', in G.B. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration, pp. 177—91. London: Sage.
55.
Schick, A. (1996) The Spirit of Reform. Wellington : State Services Commission.
56.
Seldon, A. (1990) `The Cabinet Office and Coordination, 1979—1987 ', Public Administration68: 103—21.
57.
Steering Group (1991) Review of State Sector Reforms. Wellington: State Service Commission.
58.
Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R. and Mitchell, J. (1991) Markets, Hierachies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life. London: Sage.
59.
Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
Verhoest, K. and Bouckaert, G. (2005) `Machinery of Government and Policy Capacity: The Effects of Specialisation and Coordination', in M. Painter and J. Pierre (Eds) Policy Capacity. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
61.
Verhoest, K., Legrain, A. and Bouckaert, G. (2003) Over Samenwerking en Afstemming: Instrumenten voor een Optimale Beleids- en Beheerscoördinatie binnen de Publieke Sector. Brussels: Academia Press.
62.
Verhoest, K., Peters, G., Bouckaert, G. and Verschuere, B. (2004) `The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual and Methodological Review', Public Administration and Development24(2): 101—18.
