In the past, Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) rarely publicized their work. In the 1990s, a few began to publish booklets and brochures for popular consumption and to establish ties with the media. These days, SAIs are concerned about communication. A communication policy completes their cycle of accountability, justifies their existence, is an essential component of their independence and efficiency and brings about measures which assess the impact of their work.The aim of this article is to analyse the latest communication strategies developed by SAIs in order to publicize the results of their activity and to provide the public with an overall vision of what they do. The study, based on a questionnaire sent out to European Union SAIs, highlights the fact that these bodies undertake wide-ranging communication activities involving a close relationship with the media and the use of Internet websites.
Points for practitioners This article explores the most recent developments in European Union SAI communication strategy. Based on survey research, the study concludes that SAIs maintain a close relationship with the media and have been able to take advantage of the opportunity offered by the Internet to publish their results and to provide users with an overview of their work. For SAIs, this analysis allows them to be graded in terms of their relationship with the media and how they use Internet websites. Hence it will be possible to establish criteria leading to improvements or maintenance of their relative situation.
ACA (Austrian Court of Audit) (2006) Austrian Court of Audit 2005/2006. Available at < http://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/en/reports/reports/reports/detail/leistungsbericht-200506.html/10September2007>
2.
Barrett, Patrick J. (2000) Developing an Effective Approach to Public Auditing , Conference Audience, Occasional Paper. Available at <http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/Developing_an_Effective_Approach_to_Public_Auditing.pdf/10January2005> ;
3.
Bourn, Sir John (2005) `Public Audit in the United Kingdom', in Milagros García (ed.) Public Expenditure Control in Europe. Coordinating Audit Functions in the European Union, pp. 30-54. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
4.
Demunter, Christophe (2006) `How Skilled are Europeans in Using Computers and the Internet?', Statistics in Focus17: 1-8. Available at < http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NP-06-017/EN/KS-NP-06-017-EN.PDF/19May2006>
5.
Dye, Kenneth M. and Stapenhurst, Rick (1997) `Pillars of Integrity: The Importance of Supreme Audit Institutions in Curbing Corruption', Working Papers and Articles. Available at <http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/pillars.pdf/10October2005>
6.
ECA (European Court of Auditors) (2002) The Court's Communication Policies and Standards. Available at <http://eca.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/aboutus/abouttheeca/communicationpolicy/16November2005>
7.
Erbiti, Fermín (2003) `Communicating Audit Results: Still a Challenge for Public Sector Audit Institutions', Eurorai Newsletter14: 29-43.
8.
Estonian State Audit Office (2005) `Strategy of the Estonian State Audit Office for 2006-2010'. Available at <www.riigikontroll.ee/upload/failid/rk_strateegia_2006-2010_eng.pdf/25September2007>
9.
Eurosai (1999) Declaration on the Independence of the SAIs. Adopted at the 4th Congress of the European Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions , 4 June. Available at <http://www.vkontrole.lt/en/regulatory_documents_declaration.shtml/15September2007>
10.
Grande, Ildenfonso and Abascal, Elena (1999) Fundamentos y técnicas de investigación comercial . Madrid: Esic Editorial.
11.
Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L. and Black, William C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis . London: Prentice Hall International .
12.
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Harcourt, Alison (2002) `Engineering Europeanization: The Role of European Institutions in Shaping National Media Regulation', Journal of European Public Policy9(5): 736-55.
14.
INTOSAI (International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions) (2005a) Strategic Plan 2005-2010. Washington, DC: INTOSAI.
15.
Intosai (2005b) Report on the 18th UN/INTOSAI Seminar on Government Auditing, Vienna, 18-22 April 2005. Available at <http://intosai.connexcc-hosting.net/blueline/upload/3vn2005e.pdf/21February2006>
16.
Intosai (2006) INTOSAI Communication Policy: A Framework `Mutual Exchange of Information Benefits All'. Available at <http://www.intosai.org/blueline/upload/compolicyfin031106.doc/3September2007>
17.
Lonsdale, Jeremy (1999) `Impacts', in Christopher Pollitt, Xavier Girre, Jeremy Lonsdale, Robert Mul , Hilkka Summa and Marit Waerness (eds) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, pp. 171-93. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
López, Antonio and González, Belén (2005) `Communication and Publicising of Role and Auditing Results Carried out by Supreme Audit Institutions in the European Union', paper presented to 10th Biennial CIGAR Conference, 26-27 May 2005, Poitiers, France.
19.
Muñoz, Luis (2007) `El control externo: Parlamento y opinión pública' , Auditoría Pública42: 9-16.
20.
Netherlands Court of Audit (2003) Performance and Operation of Public Administration. Strategy 2004-2009. Available at <http://www.rekenkamer.nl/9282000/d/strategie_eng.pdf/28September2007>
21.
Netherlands Court of Audit (2005) Annual Report 2004. Available at <http://www.rekenkamer.nl/9282000/d/2004_annual_report.pdf/14September2007>
22.
Pollitt, Christopher (1999) `Overview', in Christopher Pollitt, Xavier Girre, Jeremy Lonsdale, Robert Mul , Hilkka Summa and Marit Waerness (eds) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, pp. 194-219. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Pollitt, Christopher (2003) `Performance Audit in Western Europe: Trends and Choices', Critical Perspectives on Accounting14(1-2): 157-70.
24.
Pollitt, Christopher and Summa, Hilkka (1997) `Reflexive Watchdogs? How Supreme Audit Institutions Account for Themselves', Public Administration75(Summer): 313-36.
25.
Pollitt, Christopher and Summa, Hilkka (1998) `Evaluation and the Work of Supreme Audit Institutions: An Uneasy Relationship?', in Evaluation des politiques publiques , pp. 63-82. Paris. L'Harmattan.
26.
Pollitt, Christopher and Summa, Hilkka (1999) `Performance Audit and Public Management Reform' , in Christopher Pollitt, Xavier Girre, Jeremy Lonsdale , Robert Mul, Hilkka Summa and Marit Waerness (eds) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, pp. 1-10. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Pollit, Christopher, Girre, Xavier, Lonsdale, Jeremy, Mul, Robert, Summa, Hilkka and Waerness, Marit (eds) (1999) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Public Audit Forum (1999) The Principles of Public Audit. A Statement by the Public Audit Forum. Available at <http://www.public-audit-forum.gov.uk/popa.htm/15September2007>
29.
Ramkumar, Vivek and Krafchik, Warren (2005) `The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Auditing and Public Finance Management', paper presented to 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government , 24-25 May, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
30.
Schwartz, Robert (2000) `State Audit - Panacea for the Crisis of Accountability? An Empirical Study of the Israeli Case', International Journal of Public Administration23(4): 405-33.
31.
Sigma (2001) Relation between Supreme Audit Institutions and Parliamentary Committees. Available at <http://www.nao.gov.mt/reports/collaborations/Relationpercent20betweenpercent20SAIspercent20andpercent20Parliamentarypercent20Committtees.pdf/18July2005>
32.
Sigma (2005) SIGMA Peer Assistance Review of the Riigikontroll of Estonia. The Detailed Report of the Peers. Available at <http://www.riigikontroll.ee/upload/failid/estonia_detailed_report_and_annexes_23.09.05.pdf/2September2007>
33.
State Audit Office of Hungary (2006) Strategy 2006-2010. Available at <http://www.asz.hu/ASZ/nemzetk.nsf/0/7F04ACBA114AEC96C12573230027C399/$File/Strategy_of_the_SAO.pdf/20September2007>
34.
State Audit Office of Latvia (2007) Public Relations. Available at <http://www.lrvk.gov.lv/page.php?id=1897/14September2007>
35.
Sterling, Robert R. (1967) `A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory: A Review Article', Journal of Accounting Research5(1): 95-112.
36.
The Office of the Auditor General of Norway, the Polish Supreme Chamber of Control, the Office of the Auditor General of Canada and the Swedish National Audit Office (2006) Peer Review Report: National Audit Office of Denmark. Available at < http://www.rigsrevisionen.dk/media(267,1033)/Peer_review.pdf/10September2007>
37.
Tjarve, Rolands (2007) `How the State Audit Office of the Republic of Latvia Pays Society's Attention to its Work?', paper presented to Supreme Audit Institutions Communication Strategies Worshop , 14-15 June, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
38.
UK NAO (United Kingdom National Audit Office) ( 2005) State Audit in the European Union. Available at <http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/state_audit/State_Audit_Book.pdf./20January2006>
39.
UK NAO (2007) Diversity Annual Report 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. Available at < http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/Diversity_Annual_Report2004-5_2005-6.pdf/10December2007>
40.
Waerness, Marit (1999) `Products', in Christopher Pollitt, Xavier Girre, Jeremy Lonsdale, Robert Mul , Hilkka Summa and Marit Waerness (eds) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, pp. 149-70. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Walker, David M. (2007) `Transparent Government and Access to Information: A Role for Supreme Audit Institutions', presentation at the Seventh Global Forum on Reinventing Government, 26 June, Vienna, Austria. Available at <http://www.gao.gov/htext/d071068cg.html/20October2007>
