What drives citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal government agencies? Are these determinants constant across agencies, or do they differ? In this article, we examine elements of citizen perceived performance as determinants of satisfaction and trust in federal agencies using a multi-year, cross-sectional, multi-agency sample of respondents. Focusing on six high-incidence federal agencies experienced by a large cross-section of American citizens, we observe differences in the determinants of satisfaction and trust, which include perceptions of the quality of the services experienced and the information provided, demographic factors, citizen expectations, and e-government adoption. We discuss these differences, with a particular focus on the implications of these findings for the practice of performance benchmarking. Given that one central objective of a variety of recent federal initiatives has been to better measure bureaucratic performance with the goal of improving the quality of services delivered to citizens through benchmarking, these findings highlight the complexity of government efforts to realize this goal. In conclusion, suggestions for improving cross-agency benchmarking are provided.
Points for practitioners
The key finding in this article for public administration and management practitioners relates to the difficulties inherent in identifying benchmarking partners, and thus in effectively benchmarking performance across agencies with the goal of identifying best practices useful in improving performance. These difficulties arise from the differential nature of what determines citizen satisfaction across agencies with different missions, purposes and goals. An alternative strategy for identifying benchmarking partners based on similarities in satisfaction determinants — what we call ‘benchmark partner selection by determinants’ — is discussed.
Aksim J., Johnsen A. and Christophersen KA ( 2007) Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(2): 297-320.
2.
Ammons DN ( 1999) A proper mentality for benchmarking. Public Administration Review59(2): 105-109.
3.
Arbuckle J. ( 2006) AMOS 7.0 User’s Guide. Spring House, PAAMOS Development Corporation.
4.
Beck P., Rainey H., Nicholls K. and Traut C. ( 1987) Citizen views of taxes and services: A tale of three cities . Social Science Quarterly68(2): 223-243.
5.
Behn R. ( 2003) Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review63(5): 586-606.
6.
Bell RA and Morey RC ( 1994) The search for appropriate benchmarking partners: A macro approach and application to corporate travel management. Omega22(5): 477-490.
7.
Bollen KA ( 1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
Bouckaert G. and Van de Walle S. ( 2003) Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’. International Review of Administrative Sciences69(3): 329-343.
9.
Bouckaert G., Van de Walle S. and Kampen JK ( 2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences71(2): 229-240.
10.
Box RC ( 1999) Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. American Review of Public Administration29(1): 19-43.
11.
Bruder KA and Gray EM ( 1994) Public sector benchmarking: A practical approach. Public Management76(9): S9-S14.
12.
Bryant BE and Cha J. ( 1996) Crossing the threshold. Marketing Research8(4): 20-28.
13.
Chadwick A. and May C. ( 2003) Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: ‘e-government’ in the United States, Britain and theEuropean Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration16(2): 271-300.
14.
Coe C. ( 1999) Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major multigovernment efforts. Public Administration Review59(2): 110-123.
15.
DeHoog R., Lowery D. and Lyons W. ( 1990) Citizen satisfaction with local governance: A test of individual, jurisdictional and city-specific explanations. Journal of Politics52: 807-837.
16.
Dull M. ( 2006) Why PART? The institutional politics of presidential budget reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16(2): 187-215.
17.
Enders CK ( 2001) The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models. Educational and Psychological Measurement61(5): 713-740.
18.
Enders CK and Bandalos DL ( 2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling8(3): 430-457.
19.
Folz DH ( 2004) Service quality and benchmarking the performance of municipal services. Public Administration Review64(2): 209-220.
20.
Fornell C., Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J. and Bryant BE ( 1996) The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing70(1): 3-14.
21.
Fornell C., Van Amburg D., Morgeson F. and Bryant B. ( 2005) The American Customer Satisfaction Index at 10 Years. Ann Arbor, MI: The Stephen M. Ross School of Business .
22.
Gilmour JB and Lewis DE ( 2005) Assessing performance budgeting at OMB: The influence of politics, performance, and program size. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16(2): 169-186.
23.
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL and Black WC ( 1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (5th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Hatry HP ( 2006) Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
25.
Heintzman R. and Marson B. ( 2005) People, service and trust: Is there a public sector value chain?International Review of Administrative Sciences71(4): 549-575.
26.
Hetherington MJ ( 1998) The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review92(4): 791-808.
27.
Howard C. ( 2010) ‘Are we being served? A critical perspective on Canada’s Citizens First satisfaction surveys. International Review of Administrative Sciences76(1): 65-83.
28.
James O. ( 2009) Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19(1): 107-123.
29.
Jones LR and Thompson F. ( 1999) Public Management: Institutional Renewal for the Twenty-first Century. Stamford, CT: JAI Press .
30.
Keehley PS, Medlin S., MacBride S. and Longmire L. ( 1996) Benchmarking for Best Practices in the Public Sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Kelly J. ( 2005) The dilemma of the unsatisfied customer in a market model of public administration. Public Administration Review65(1): 76-84.
32.
Kelly JM and Rivenbark WC ( 2003) Performance Budgeting for State and Local Government. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
33.
Kelly J. and Swindell D. ( 2002a) A multiple indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review62(5): 610-621.
34.
Kelly JM and Swindell D. ( 2002b) Service quality variation across urban space: First steps towards a model of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Urban Affairs24(3): 271-288.
35.
Kouzmin A., Loffler E., Klages H. and Kakabadse N. ( 1999) Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors . International Journal of Public Sector Management12(2): 121-144.
36.
Meier KJ and O’Toole LJ Jr (2009) The proverbs of New Public Management: Lessons from an evidence-based research agenda. American Review of Public Administration39(1): 4-22.
37.
Milakovich ME ( 2003) Balancing customer service, empowerment and performance with citizenship, responsiveness and political accountability. International Public Management Review4(1): 61-83.
38.
Miller TI and Kobayashi M. ( 2000) City Surveys: How to Do Them, How to Use Them, and What They Mean. Washington, DC: ICCMA .
39.
Mizrahi S. and Vigoda-Gadot E. ( 2009) Citizens’ learning, involvement, and participation in decision-making under the democratic ethos: A theoretical framework and the Israeli experience. International Journal of Public Administration32(5): 438-460.
40.
Mizrahi S., Vogoda-Gadot E. and Cohen N. ( 2009) Trust, participation and performance in public administration: An empirical examination of health services in Israel. Public Performance and Management Review33(1): 7-33.
41.
Morgeson FV III ( 2011) Comparing determinants of website satisfaction and loyalty across the e-government and e-business domains. Electronic Government: An International Journal8(2/3): 164-184.
42.
Morgeson FV III and Mithas S. ( 2009) Does e-government measure up to e-business? Comparing end-user perceptions of US federal government and e-business websites. Public Administration Review69(4): 740-752.
43.
Morgeson FV III, VanAmburg D. and Mithas S. ( 2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21(2): 257-283.
44.
Oliver RL ( 1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer . New.York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
45.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (2008 ) Program assessment rating tool, guidance no. 2008-01. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/performance_pdfs/part_guid_2008.pdf
46.
Osborne D. and Gaebler T. ( 1992) Reinventing Government. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
47.
Osborne D. and Plastrik P. ( 2000) The Reinventor’s Fieldbook: Tools for Transforming your Government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
Ostrom E. ( 1973) The need for multiple indicators in measuring the output of public agencies. Policy Studies Journal2: 85-91.
49.
Poister TH and Henry GT ( 1994) Citizen ratings of public and private service quality: A comparative perspective. Public Administration Review54: 155-160.
50.
Poister TH and Streib G. ( 1999) Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review59(4): 325-334.
51.
Program Assessment Rating Tool Guidance No. 2008-01. Office of Management and Budget. 29 January 2008. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/performance_pdfs/part_guid_2008.pdf
52.
Roch CH and Poister TH ( 2006) Citizens, accountability and service satisfaction: The influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review41(3): 292-308.
53.
Stalebrink OJ ( 2008) National performance mandates and intergovernmental collaboration: An examination of the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). American Review of Public Administration39(6): 619-639.
54.
Stipak B. ( 1979) Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review39(1): 46-52.
55.
Stipak B. ( 1980) Local governments’ use of citizen surveys. Public Administration Review40(5): 521-525.
56.
Swiss JE ( 1992) Adapting Total Quality Management (TQM) to government . Public Administration Review52(4): 356-362.
57.
Szymanski DM and Henard DH ( 2001) Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science29(1): 16-35.
58.
Thomas CW ( 1998) Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society30(2): 166-193.
59.
Thomas JC and Streib G. ( 2003) The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(1): 83-102.
60.
Tolbert CJ and Mossberger K. ( 2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review66(3): 354-369.
61.
Van de Walle S. and Bouckaert G. ( 2003) Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration26(8-9): 891-913.
62.
Van de Walle S., Van Roosbroek S. and Bouckaert G. ( 2008) Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences74(1): 47-64.
63.
Van Ryzin GG ( 2004) Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23(3): 433-448.
64.
Van Ryzin GG ( 2006) Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16(4): 599-611.
65.
Van Ryzin GG ( 2007) Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction and trust. Public Performance & Management Review30(4): 521-535.
66.
Van Ryzin GG, Muzzio D., Immerwahr S., Gulick L. and Martinez E. ( 2004) Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index Model to New York City. Public Administration Review64(3): 331-341.
67.
Vigoda-Gadot E. ( 2007) Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory17(2): 285-305.
68.
Vigoda-Gadot E. and Yuval F. ( 2003) Managerial quality, administrative performance and trust in governance revisited. International Journal of Public Sector Management16(7): 502-522.
69.
Vigoda-Gadot E., Shoham A., Schwabsky N. and Ruvio A. ( 2008a) Public sector innovation for Europe: A multinational eight-country exploration of citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration86(2): 307-329.
70.
Vigoda-Gadot E., Mizhari S., Miller-Mor R. and Tevet E. ( 2008b) The bureaucracy-democracy tango: A dual-source empirical revalidation by structural equation modeling in the Israeli public sector . Policy and Politics36(4): 431-448.
71.
Vigoda-Gadot E., Shoham A. and Vashdi DR ( 2010) Bridging bureaucracy and democracy in Europe: A comparative study of perceived managerial excellence, satisfaction with public services, and trust in governance. European Union Politics11: 289-308.
72.
Wagenheim GD and Reurink JH ( 1991) Customer service in public administration. Public Administration Review51(3): 263-270.
73.
Wang X. and Gianakis GA ( 1999) Public officials’ attitudes toward subjective preformance measures. Public Productivity & Management Review22(4): 537-553.
74.
Welch EW, Hinnant CC and Moon MJ ( 2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(3): 371-391.
75.
Wholey JS and Hatry H. ( 1992) The case for performance monitoring. Public Administration Review52(6): 604-610.
76.
Yang K. and Holzer M. ( 2006) The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review66(1): 114-126.
77.
Yasin MM ( 2002) The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now . Benchmarking: An International Journal9(3): 217-243.
78.
Zeithaml VA, Berry LL and Parasuraman A. ( 1993) The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science21(1): 1-12.
