How do humans understand, or in other words attribute meaning to, messages
across cultures? This inquiry leads to analyses of meaning in written or spoken
utterances and their relationship to cognitive processes. Some communication
models attempt to accommodate the fact that meanings are culturally based and
therefore differ from culture to culture, but this paper proposes a model that
shows how meanings are generated from the attributions by the perceiver as well
as from knowledge of the actual culture. Individuals project mental schemata of
unfamiliar cultures. Furthermore, as uncertainty is reduced by cognitive under
standing, schemata can grow more to resemble the actual culture. But the
induction of information does not always result in improved intercultural
communication; an individual's attitudes and evaluations can become unaccept
ing, negatively evaluating, and ultimately antagonistic toward the other culture.
Often this hostile position is triggered by feelings of distrust because of the gulf
between what was previously projected about the unfamiliar culture and reality.
When this cognitive dissonance occurs, intercultural communication appears
unlikely to succeed. The model is applied to a historical case study: the first
official trade encounter between members of a trade mission from Great Britain
and Emperor Qian Long's court in China. Seven hypotheses for future research
are proposed.
References
1.
Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed). New York: W. H. Freeman.
2.
Agar, M. (1994) The intercultural frame. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(2), 221-237.
3.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Beamer, L. (1992). Learning intercultural communication competence . The Journal of Business Communication, 27, 285-303.
5.
Beamer, L. (1994). Teaching English business writing to Chinese-speaking business students. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, LVII, 12-18.
6.
Berger, C.R. (1979). Beyond initial interactions. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). London: Edward Arnold.
7.
Berger, C.R., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interactions and beyond. Human Communication Research, 5, 99-112.
8.
Blakemore, D. (1991). Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Bloch, M. (1991). Language, anthropology and cognitive science. Man, 26(2), 183-198.
10.
Bowman, J.P.,. & Targowski, A.S. (1987). Modeling the communication process: The map is not the territoryThe Journal of Business Communication, 24, 21-34.
11.
Brewer, W.F., & Treyens, J.C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
12.
Campbell, D., & Level, D. (1985). A black box model of communications. The Journal of Business Communication, 22, 37-47.
13.
Casmir, F.L. (1985) Stereotypes and schemata. Communication, culture, and organizational processes. W. B. Gudykunst , L. P. Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey, (Eds.) (pp. 48-57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Chapel, W.B. (1991). Human-computer interactions for business communication: A cognitive model. In S.J. Bruno (Ed.), Near and far horizons: Proceedings of the 56th annual convention of the Association for Business Communication (pp. 95-109). Houston : University of Houston, Clear Lake.
15.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
16.
Detweiler, R. (1975). On inferring the intentions of a person from another culture. Journal of Personality, 43, 591-611.
17.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Gudykunst, W.B. (1984) Communicating with strangers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Gudykunst, W.B. (1985) Normative power and conflict potential in intergroup relationships. In W. B. Gudykunst, L. P Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.) Communication, culture and organizational processes (pp 155-173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Gudykunst, W.B., & Hammer, M.R. (1988). Strangers and hosts: An uncertainty reduction based theory of intercultural adaptation. In Y.Y. Kim and W.B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches (pp. 106-139), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Gudykunst, W.B., & Kim, Y.Y. (1984). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
22.
Hardy, W.G. (1978). Language, thought and experience: A tapestry of the dimensions of meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
23.
Howarth, D.A., & Savage, G.T. (1989). A channel-ratio model of intercultural communication: The trains won't sell, fix them please. The Journal of Business Communication, 26, 231-254.
24.
Howell, W.S. (1979). Theoretical directions for intercultural communication . In M. K. Asante, E. Newmark, & C. A. Blake (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 23-41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Jaspars, J. & Hewstone, M. (1982). Cross-cultural interaction, social attribution, and inter-group relations. In S. Bochner (Ed.), Cultures in contact (pp. 127-156). Elmsford, NY : Pergamon.
26.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238.
27.
Kelley, H.H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
28.
Kempson, R.M. (1988). Language, mind, and reality. In R. M. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality (pp. 3-25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Kim, Y.Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
30.
Lewis, P.V. (1987). Organizational communication: The essence of effective management (3rd ed.). New York : John Wiley.
31.
Mandler, G. (1985). Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
Maruyama, M. (1974). Paradigmatology and its application to cross-disciplinary, cross-professional and cross-cultural communication. Dialectica , 28, 136-196.
33.
Moise, E.E. (1986). Modern China. New York: Longman.
34.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
35.
Ogden, C.K., & Richards, I.A. (1949). The meaning of meaning (10th ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace.
36.
Oliver, R.T. (1971). Communication and culture in ancient India and China. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
37.
Peyrefitte, A. (1992) The immobile empire. New York : Alfred Knopf, Inc. (Original work published 1989)
38.
Samovar, L.A., & Porter, R.E. (1991) Communication between cultures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
Schank, R.C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
42.
Szalay, L.B. (1981) Intercultural communication — a process model . International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 5(2), 133-146.
43.
Targowski, A.S., & Bowman, J.P. (1988). The layer-based, pragmatic model of the communication process. The Journal of Business Communication, 2, 5-24.
44.
Thayer, L. (1968). Communication and communication systems. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
45.
Torbiorn, I. (1988) Culture barriers as a social psychological construct: An empirical validation. In Y Y Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.) Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches (pp. 169-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Triandis, H. (1959). Cognitive similarity and interpersonal communication in industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 321-326.
47.
Triandis, H. (1960a). Cognitive similarity and communication in a dyad . Human Relations, 13, 175-183.
48.
Triandis, H. (1960b). Some determinants of interpersonal communication . Human Relations, 13, 279-287.
49.
Triandis, H.C., & Albert, R.D. (1987). Cross-cultural perspectives. In F.M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam , K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 264-295). Beverly Hills: Sage.
50.
Witte, K. (1993) A theory of cognition and negative affect: Extending Gudykunst and Hammer's theory of uncertainty and anxiety reduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 17, 197-215.
