Quasi-Disk Type Microbond Pull-Out Test for Evaluating Fiber/Matrix Adhesion in Composites

Abstract

Adhesion strength between epoxy resin and carbon fiber was analyzed using various microbond types adhered onto a single carbon fiber. Experimental pull-out tests were performed for a quasi-disk type, a hemispherical type and a droplet type microbond specimen. The quasi-disk type microbond specimen showed high regression coefficient and low standard deviation in the measurement of interfacial shear strength data as compared with the droplet and hemispherical ones. Average value of interfacial shear strength for quasi-disk type was about 55% as large as those for the other types. Finite element analysis showed that the stress distributions along the interface in the quasi-disk type specimen did not have such drastic stress concentrations susceptible to variations in the specimen geometry as revealed in the cases of droplet and hemispherical types. The experimental data were different according to the kinds of loading device such as the microvise-tip and the pin-holed plate. The use of a pin-holed steel section was useful for testing the quasi-disk type microbond specimens to give low scattering in the measurement of strength data.

Keywords

quasi-disk microbond specimen interfacial shear strength hemispherical microbond droplet microbond single fiber/matrix pull-out test.

References

Broutman, L.J. (1969). Measurement of the Fiber-Polymer Matrix Interfacial Strength, Interfaces in Composites, ASTM STP 452: 27-41.

Kelly, A. and Tyson, W.R. (1965). Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Metals: Copper/ Tungsten and Copper/Molybdenum, Journal of Mechanics and Physics in Solids, 13: 329-350.

Drzal, L.T. , Rich, M.J. and Lloyd, P.F. (1982). Adhesion of Graphite Fibers to Epoxy Matrices: I. The Role of Fiber Surface Treatment, Journal of Adhesion , 16: 1-30.

Moon, C.K. and Um, Y.S. (1991). The Effect of Fiber Diameter and Surface Treatment on the Interfacial Shear Strength, Polymer(Korea), 15(3): 289-296.

Park, J.M. , Kim, Y.M. , Kim, K.W. and Yoon, P.J. (2000). Interfacial Aspects of Electrodeposited Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Using Monomeric and Polymeric Coupling Agents , Colloid Interface Sciences, 231: 114-128.

Nairn, J.A. (2000). Analytical Fracture Mechanics Analysis of the Pull-Out Test Including the Effects of Friction and Thermal Stresses, Advanced Composite Letters, 9(6): 373-383.

Takaku, A. and Arridge, R.G.C. (1973). The Effect of Interfacial Radial and Shear Stress on Fibre Pull-Out in Composite Materials, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 6: 2038-2047.

Gray, R.J. (1984). Analysis of the Effect of Embedded Fibre Length on the Fibre Debonding and Pull-Out from an Elastic Matrix, Journal of Materials Science, 19: 861-870.

Banbaji, J. (1988). On a More Generalized Theory of the Pull-Out Test from an Elastic Matrix. Part I, Theoretical Considerations, Composites Science and Technology, 32: 183-193.

10.

Piggott, M.R. and Xiong, Y. (1994). Visualization of Debonding of fully and partially Embedded Glass Fibres in Epoxy Resins , Composites Science and Techno1ogy, 52: 535-540.

11.

Mandell, J.F. , Chen, J.H. and McGarry, F.J. (1980). A Microdebonding Test for in Situ Assessment of Fibre/Matrix Bond Strength in Composite Materials , International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1(1): 40-44.

12.

Wang, S.W. , Khan, A. , Sands, R. and Vasudeven, A.K. (1992). A Novel Nanoindentor Technique for Measuring Fiber-Matrix Interfacial Strengths in Composites, Journal of Materials Science Letters, 11: 739-741.

13.

Herrera-Franco, P.J. and Drzal, L.T. (1992). Comparison of Methods for the Measurement of Fibre/Matrix Adhesion in Composites, Composites, 23: 2-27.

14.

Wagner, H.D. , Gallis, H.E. and Wiesel, E. (1993). Study of the Interface in Kevlar 49-Epoxy Composites by Means of Microbond and Fragmentation Tests: Effects of Materials and Testing Variables, Journal of Materials Science, 28: 2238-2244.

15.

Nishikawa, M. , Okabe, T. and Takeda, N. (2008). Determination of Interface Properties from Experiments on the Fragmentation Process in Single-fiber Composites , Materials Science and Engineering A, 480: 549-557.

16.

Mandell, J.F. , Chen, J.H. and McGarry, F.J. (1980). A Microdebonding Test for In-situ Fibermatrix Bond and Moisture Effects, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Res Rep R80-1.

17.

Miller, B. , Muri, P. and Rebenfeld, L. (1987). A Microbond Method for Determination of the Shear Strength of a Fiber/Resin Interface, Composites Science and Technology, 28: 17-32.

18.

Day, R.J. and Cauich Rodrigez , J.V. (1998). Investigation of the Micromechanics of the Microbond Test, Composites Science and Technology, 58: 907-914.

19.

Gaur, U. and Miller, B. (1989). Microbond Method for Determination of the Shear Strength of a Fiber/Resin Interface: Evaluation of Experimental Parameters , Composites Science and Technology, 34: 35-51.

20.

Piggott, M.R. and Dai, S.R. (1991). Fiber Pull-Out Experiments with Thermoplastics, Polymer Engineering and Science , 31(17): 1246-1249.

21.

Kang, S.K. , Lee, D.B. and Choi, N.S. (2009). Fiber/Epoxy Interfacial Shear Strength Measured by the Microdroplet Test, Composites Science and Technology , 69: 245-251.

22.

Nishikawa, M. , Okabe, T. , Hemmi , K. and Takeda, N. (2008). Micromechanical Modeling of the Microbond Test to Quantify the Interfacial Properties in Fiber-reinforced Composites, International Journal of Solids and Structures , 45: 4098-4113.

23.

Hampe, A. (1987). Grundlegende Untersuchungen an Faserverstarkten Polymeren, BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Federal Republic of Germany.

24.

Choi, N.S. and Park, J.E. (2009). Fiber/Matrix Interfacial Shear Strength Measured by a Quasi-disk Microbond Specimen, Composites Science and Technology (in press).