The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of the availability of final-offer arbitration on the collective bargaining process and its outcomes. If this technique is to act as an effective strike substitute, it should provide bargainers with incentives to negotiate agreements bilaterally and should distribute bargaining power in much the same manner as would the right to strike. Empirical evidence is provided to evaluate the operation of final-offer arbitration in terms of these attributes. On the basis of this evidence, it would appear that policy-makers should consider final-offer arbitration as an alternative device for resolving conflicts.
References
1.
The Baseball Encyclopedia ( 1976) New York : Macmillan.
2.
Broadcasting Magazine (various issues).
3.
Demmert, H. (1973) The Economics of Professional Team SportsLexington, MA: Lexington Books.
4.
Dworkin, J. (1976) "The impact of final-offer interest arbitration on bargaining: the case of major league baseball," pp. 161-169 in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Winter Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association.
5.
El Hodiri, M. and J. Quirk (1971) "An economic model of a professional sports league."J. of Pol. Economy79: 1302-1319.
6.
Feuille, P. (1975a) "Final-offer arbitration and the chilling effect."Industrial Relations14: 302-319
7.
——— ( 1975b) Final Offer ArbitrationChicago: International Personnel Management Association .
8.
Ford, J. (1978) "F.A.N.S. analysis: Reds = $$$."Leftfield1: 1, 8.
9.
Kaufman, B. (1977) "The propensity to strike in American manufacturing," pp. 419-426 in Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Winter Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association .
10.
Lipsky, D. and T. Barocci, (1979) "Final-offer arbitration and public safety employees : the Massachusetts experience," pp. 65-76 in Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association.
11.
Medoff, M. (1976) "On monopsonistic exploitation in professional baseball."Q. Rev. of Economics and Business16: 113-121.
12.
Noll, R. (1974) Government and the Sports BusinessWashington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Notz, W. and F. Starke (1978) "Final-offer versus conventional arbitration as means of conflict management."Admin. Sci. Q.23: 189-203.
14.
The Official Baseball Dope Book (various yearsSt. Louis : Sporting News.
15.
The Official Baseball Guide (various yearsSt. Louis: Sporting News.
16.
Pascal, A. and L. Rapping (1972) "The economics of racial discrimination in organized baseball," in A. H. PASCAL (ed.) Racial Discrimination in Economic Life.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17.
Rottenberg, S. (1956) "The baseball player's labor market."J. of Pol. Economy64: 242-258.
18.
Scoville, J. (1974) "Labor relations in sports," in R. Noll (ed.) Government and the Sports Business.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
19.
Scully, G. (1974) "Pay and performance in major league baseball."Amer. Econ. Rev.64: 915-930.
20.
Subbarao, A. (1978a) "Final-offer selection vs. last-offer-by-issue systems of arbitration."Industrial Relations Industrielles33: 38-57.
21.
——— (1978b) "The impact of binding interest arbitration on negotiation and process outcome."J. of Conflict Resolution22: 79-103.
22.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Consumer Income, P-60 (various issues). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
